Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:55 28 Mar 2024
* Manhunt after stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 12:07 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 12:13:26 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[161] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[91] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[62] Return of the BRUTE?
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[49] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[38] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: SWT v Southern v FGW - a journey of comparison  (Read 14429 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: March 23, 2008, 08:34:56 »

Coming back from Portsmouth yesterday, and arriving at "Harbour" just after the 16:22 had gone, I decided to hop along the coast using other operator's trains to SOuthampton to get a bit more of a contrasting view - to see if we're REALLY being fair to FGW (First Great Western) in terms of slamming them for overcrowding, and lack of appropriate services.

South West Trains

Left Portsmouth Harbour on the 16:54 to Basingstoke - a 4 car class 450.  Warm, comfortable, and very sparse in terms of the number of passengers (estimate - 10% to 20% of seats occupied at some point).  Clean, modern, excellent acceleration.  Changed at Fareham, where its route diverged from the route that I was taking.

Another South West Trains service from Portsmouth Harbour (to Fareham), 8 coaches, was less that 10 minutes behind.  It teminated at Fareham - I saw it arrive, and counted just 4 passengers detraining.


The 17:01 from Portsmouth Harbour, terminating at Fareham

Southern

Another 4 car electric train, through from Victoria. On time. Again, warm and comfortable and with a very low occupancy rate, again somewhere in the 10% to 20% of seats taken.  Not quite so clean in terms of a few bits of junk on seats as would be expected towards the end of a long run.   The use of electric trains on this section shown to be really good because of the fast accessleration from the (two) stops on this service and all the slowings for junctions and tight corners.


Inside the Southern Victoria to Southampron service

First Great Westerm

A 2 car diesel train of class 150.  Like the Southern and South West trains, this service was on time but in comparison to them it was noisy, smelly, and dirty. I joined the service at Southampton, from where every seat was taken and quite a lot of people were standing - but it wasn't to the uncomfortable / denied boarding levels.

Passengers remained standing from Romsey to Salisbury, but from that point on I think everyone got a seat, all be it the extra tipup seats in the vestibules were still in use which (perhaps) is not ideal for people making longer distance journeys.


Joining the FGW service at Southampton Central

Note

It was a cold and blustery Easter Saturday with snow flurries which probably reduced the number of sightseers and day trippers from a normal bank holiday. Bath rugby were at home, there was a Cardiff / Bristol match and I understand there were events at the Millenium Stadium.  In contrast, Portmouth were away but I think Southampton may have been at home, not sure who to.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2008, 09:08:38 »

I have travelled on Southern from Victoria-Bognor before and there trains are brilliant, they are clean comfortable and have air conditioning.
SWT (South West Trains) are the best operator between London and Exeter IMO (in my opinion), there trains are far more comfortable and usually just as long as a HST (High Speed Train) and pretty empty.
I also had the bad experience of a busy 150 yesterday, and had to sit on a tip up seat in the vestibule for 1 1/2 hours with the other half of the vestibule filled with luggage and two other people sitting on bags. But what really anoied me was under 5's sitting on seats while paying customers stood. The conductor didn't fancy the train so didn't do a ticket check till an hour in, St.Austell. Until then he hid in the rear cab. It was a pretty bad experience.
Logged
Graz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2008, 09:33:47 »

Many thanks for that Graham, I'm always really interested to see the comparison in trains and usage on other parts of the network.

I must say I'm really surprised at the low passenger numbers on SWT (South West Trains) services from PM Harbour, but is it always like this? 8 coaches and 4 people leaving seems like such a waste of good carriages. What's that, 1/2 a person per coach!?

I wonder whether SWT could put this train to better use on a certain notoriously overloaded part of the network (Southampton/Salisbury - Westbury - Bristol). More revenue, happier passengers, relief for FGW (First Great Western)...
Logged
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 23, 2008, 09:41:09 »

I wonder whether SWT (South West Trains) could put this train to better use on a certain notoriously overloaded part of the network (Southampton/Salisbury - Westbury - Bristol). More revenue, happier passengers, relief for FGW (First Great Western)...
They can't as Grahame saw a Class 450 Electric Multiple Unit.
Logged
Graz
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 444


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: March 23, 2008, 09:47:25 »

Was the 8 coach one a class 450 as well?

If so, it makes me wish the Southampton-Bristol route was 'electrified'...
Logged
dog box
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 653


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 23, 2008, 10:03:52 »

I have travelled on Southern from Victoria-Bognor before and there trains are brilliant, they are clean comfortable and have air conditioning.
SWT (South West Trains) are the best operator between London and Exeter IMO (in my opinion), there trains are far more comfortable and usually just as long as a HST (High Speed Train) and pretty empty.
I also had the bad experience of a busy 150 yesterday, and had to sit on a tip up seat in the vestibule for 1 1/2 hours with the other half of the vestibule filled with luggage and two other people sitting on bags. But what really anoied me was under 5's sitting on seats while paying customers stood. The conductor didn't fancy the train so didn't do a ticket check till an hour in, St.Austell. Until then he hid in the rear cab. It was a pretty bad experience.

Since when has a 6 car 159 been as long as a 2 and 8 HST set, also you will find that the 159 is virtually identical to an Fgw 158 set both being the product of Wabatec.
Incidentally the 159s have the on board customer info screens but i have yet to see them work
Logged

All postings reflect my own personal views and opinions and are not intended to be, nor should be taken as official statements of first great western or first group policy
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: March 23, 2008, 11:50:07 »

dog box, I have posted numerous times elsewhere on this forum that the customer information displays present on the class 159 and 158 fleet that SWT (South West Trains) have is yet to be put into operation. It does work, as I've seen them in action myself, and I've been sent pictures of the screens showing "SWT LUVS YOU" Grin.

For comment, a blue SWT service is a class 450 EMU (Electric Multiple Unit). A 450 is 4 coaches long - designed for outer suburban work and SWT have 127 of them, of which 1 is currently out of service due to crash damage. 450047 - 450070 are being converted to high density units for use on the Hounslow loop, Windsor lines and some other selected services.

A red SWT train is a class 455 EMU. A 455 is 4 coaches long - designed for inner suburban work and SWT have 91 of them.

A white SWT train ... there are several in this livery. Wink. A 5 coach unit is a class 444 EMU, primarily used nowadays for London to Weymouth services having replaced the class 442 fleet. A 4 coach unit is a class 458 EMU - used on the London to Reading route. A 3 coach unit is a class 159, on the WoE. And a 2 coach unit is a class 158.

Also the refurbishment on the class 159 and 158 SWT fleets is vastly different to the FGW (First Great Western) 158 refurbishment IMHO (in my humble opinion), the seats are certainly far better on a SWT refurb - and that's a key thing to note. Wink
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 23, 2008, 11:56:17 »

Many thanks for that Graham, I'm always really interested to see the comparison in trains and usage on other parts of the network.

I must say I'm really surprised at the low passenger numbers on SWT (South West Trains) services from PM Harbour, but is it always like this? 8 coaches and 4 people leaving seems like such a waste of good carriages. What's that, 1/2 a person per coach!?

I think my first observation is that no, it isnt always like this, and it can be a lot busier.

Secondly, the South Western Franchise was specified on the following basis :

Quote from: Tom Harris, Rail Minister (24/01/2007)
With regards to future usage, the Network Rail Route Utilisation Strategy (RUS (Route Utilisation Strategy)) assumed a growth of 20 per cent. over 10 years. The Department, in letting the new South Western Franchise, asked bidders to develop innovative means to manage the expected increase in capacity.

In other words, the "spare" capacity takes into account what is thought to be required for the period of the SWT franchise, not just the capacity that is required now.

This is in stark contrast to what happened with the Greater Western Franchise.
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 23, 2008, 12:40:22 »

I have travelled on Southern from Victoria-Bognor before and there trains are brilliant, they are clean comfortable and have air conditioning.
SWT (South West Trains) are the best operator between London and Exeter IMO (in my opinion), there trains are far more comfortable and usually just as long as a HST (High Speed Train) and pretty empty.
I also had the bad experience of a busy 150 yesterday, and had to sit on a tip up seat in the vestibule for 1 1/2 hours with the other half of the vestibule filled with luggage and two other people sitting on bags. But what really anoied me was under 5's sitting on seats while paying customers stood. The conductor didn't fancy the train so didn't do a ticket check till an hour in, St.Austell. Until then he hid in the rear cab. It was a pretty bad experience.

Since when has a 6 car 159 been as long as a 2 and 8 HST set, also you will find that the 159 is virtually identical to an Fgw 158 set both being the product of Wabatec.
Incidentally the 159s have the on board customer info screens but i have yet to see them work
When there 9-car between Salisbury and Waterloo.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: March 23, 2008, 12:57:31 »

I must say I'm really surprised at the low passenger numbers on SWT (South West Trains) services from PM Harbour, but is it always like this? 8 coaches and 4 people leaving seems like such a waste of good carriages. What's that, 1/2 a person per coach!?

Yes - but to be fair it was the least crowded train I saw all day, and at the tail end of its route.   The 15 - 20% loading I've quoted elsewhere was more the average.

Taking Lee's later comment about 20% growth - if you take 15% loading and grow it compound at 20% per annum for 9 years, you get 78% loading in the 10th year, so in that basis it looks like the SWT service levels / capacities are well suited for the period ahead.

Were a similar 20% growth applied to the next 8 years on FGW (First Great Western), currently around 95% capacity or higher from yesterday's snapshot, you would see over 400% loading by the end of the franchise.  Of course, it's physically impossible to have three people standing for each seat taken, so that won't happen.   

The Franschise was let, though,  on a growth rate forecast or around 1% to 2%, I believe. On that basis a 95% loading will still be a loading of only around 110% by the end of the franchise.  However, evidence points to that forecast being dramatically outstripped ... so that FGW services, even with 3 car hourly Cardiff - Portsmouth, won't be adequate through the franchise period; you need something more like 4 coaches every half hour on all sections of the route if the SWT level of growth is reached (and I think it could be with many towns such as Trowbridge, Westbury, Warmisnter and Melksham all slated for huge growth under the Regional Spatial Strategy, and the local papers already full of complains about the A36 and A350 ovecrowded accident blackspotted roads)

Here's a thought to how that can be dealt with in coming years ... making best capacity use, best use of the electric trains from Portsmouth to Southampton.

* An Hourly Portsmouth - Cardiff (4 car)
* An Hourly Southampton - Swindon, giving a 30 minutes Southampton - Trowbridge (operator could be FGW or SWT - possible extension of the Romsey - Salisbury service?) (2 car)
* An Hourly Frome - Bristol and beyond, giving 30 minute Westbury - North Bristol (4 car)

Alternate Westbury to Bristol trains - 2 cars from Weymouth, and connecting across platform at Westbury with the Southampton - Swindon service.

Connection at Southampton from the Southern train from Victoria into the Swindon train, giving connections from East of Portsmouth Island.


« Last Edit: March 23, 2008, 13:07:57 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
devon_metro
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5175



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 23, 2008, 14:12:19 »

Overkill on capacity there me thinks Graham!

Anyhow, it seems the stock is there, but not utilised correctly. 158798 on the Gloucester - Weymouth yesterday which was busy ish but plenty of seats, meanwhile the dreaded 1630 CDF» (Cardiff - next trains)-PMH lost many of its passengers at Trowbridge and I still had to wedge into a vestiable.

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2008, 14:30:54 »

Overkill on capacity there me thinks Graham!

For a year or two, yes.  But with the same growth rate as was assumed within the SWT (South West Trains) franchise, this would lead to somewhere around 90% loading by the final (second option) end of the current FGW (First Great Western) franchise.  I got quite a shock when I worked out the numbers!

With the RSS (Regional Spatial Strategy) putting 50% growth into 6 SSCTs in the Wiltshire part of the area covered alone, and without the raising of the A36 / A350 all the way from Southampton to the M4 to a dual carriageway, and with petrol prices ever higher,  I would not be suprised if compound 20% growth turns out to be rather conservative.

To some extent I agree on stock utilisation - there do seem to be some "sillies" around still, but I don't know the full picture on most of them and I'm painfully aware that what looks like an absurdly empty working may not be such on the next leg, or there could be another reason.   For example, I understand (by email) that the SWT 8 car train I saw arriving in Farehame near-empty is near-full when Portsmouth are at home, and in any case it's simply making use of a Fratton to Northam depot move for passengers.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
vacman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 2530


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 23, 2008, 21:51:38 »

dog box, I have posted numerous times elsewhere on this forum that the customer information displays present on the class 159 and 158 fleet that SWT (South West Trains) have is yet to be put into operation. It does work, as I've seen them in action myself, and I've been sent pictures of the screens showing "SWT LUVS YOU" Grin.

For comment, a blue SWT service is a class 450 EMU (Electric Multiple Unit). A 450 is 4 coaches long - designed for outer suburban work and SWT have 127 of them, of which 1 is currently out of service due to crash damage. 450047 - 450070 are being converted to high density units for use on the Hounslow loop, Windsor lines and some other selected services.

A red SWT train is a class 455 EMU. A 455 is 4 coaches long - designed for inner suburban work and SWT have 91 of them.

A white SWT train ... there are several in this livery. Wink. A 5 coach unit is a class 444 EMU, primarily used nowadays for London to Weymouth services having replaced the class 442 fleet. A 4 coach unit is a class 458 EMU - used on the London to Reading route. A 3 coach unit is a class 159, on the WoE. And a 2 coach unit is a class 158.

Also the refurbishment on the class 159 and 158 SWT fleets is vastly different to the FGW (First Great Western) 158 refurbishment IMHO (in my humble opinion), the seats are certainly far better on a SWT refurb - and that's a key thing to note. Wink
The seats in the majority of the FGW refurbed 158's are IDENTICAL in all but colour to the 159's, and therefore can be no better/worse, the interior colours of the FGW refurb is far more placid, using blue/purple which is calming, whereas SWT's is red which actually does the oposite.
Logged
swlines
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1178


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: March 23, 2008, 22:20:17 »

I must have had dodgy seats whenever I've been on the FGW (First Great Western) refurbs then - felt nothing like the SWT (South West Trains) ones!!

I've really got used to the SWT red, but then you do when you travel with them a lot!
Logged
Conner
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1041


08436 at Corfe Castle on the Swanage Railway


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: March 23, 2008, 22:25:03 »

I must have had dodgy seats whenever I've been on the FGW (First Great Western) refurbs then - felt nothing like the SWT (South West Trains) ones!!

I've really got used to the SWT red, but then you do when you travel with them a lot!
Maybe you had Richmond's, they are really uncomfortable. I have only travvelled on a non Richmond one for a couple of mins and it was amazingly comfortable.
And the refurb's aren't identical. SWT have seat back table's, FGW don't yet.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page