Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
- Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
06:50 Westbury to Weymouth
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:20:16 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What do we think we mean by "railway infrastructure" ?  (Read 630 times)
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« on: June 23, 2019, 20:28:23 »

Perhaps this sounds like a daft question because most people would consider it to mean track, signalling, motive power and rolling stock, but read on...  Grin

On Thursday lase week, 17th June, I was on the 1445 Leeds to Kings Cross (an HST (High Speed Train) by the way) sitting with a couple of local government officers who were on their way to a meeting in London. The conversation turned to railways in general and funding in particular, which always appears to be concentrated in London and not the north (so they said and I'm just reporting and not taking sides!). The matter of HS3 was brought up, a proposed new line from Manchester to Leeds and, so they say, this has now been paused/ shelved/ abandoned in favour of improving the infrastructure on the existing lines in the area.

This got me thinking.

Whilst we all think of the term infrastructure to mean track, signalling, motive power and rolling stock, there is also the alignment of the railway to take into account. All railway routes across the Pennines involve going up one side and down the other. In the days when they were built, when the opposition was a cart horse or a canal if you were lucky, it didn't really matter much if the lines twisted and turned a bit to ease the gradients for what were, at the time, state of the art but still underpowered steam locomotives. Today, however, things have moved on but those curves and chicanes are still there.

Therefore, as I see it, you could electrify and shave a few minutes off with improved acceleration and reduced dwell times with automatic doors, but if the curvature is such that limits the line speed to, say, 40 mph over some sections, you could be using the most advanced electric stock known to mankind, but it still wouldn't be going any faster around those bends, or across that curve viaduct, than a 156, a 142 or anything Horwich Works was building in the 1890s for passenger work.

What do others think?
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 23, 2019, 20:49:50 »

Perhaps this sounds like a daft question because most people would consider it to mean track, signalling, motive power and rolling stock, but read on...  Grin

On Thursday lase week, 17th June, I was on the 1445 Leeds to Kings Cross (an HST (High Speed Train) by the way) sitting with a couple of local government officers who were on their way to a meeting in London. The conversation turned to railways in general and funding in particular, which always appears to be concentrated in London and not the north (so they said and I'm just reporting and not taking sides!). The matter of HS3 was brought up, a proposed new line from Manchester to Leeds and, so they say, this has now been paused/ shelved/ abandoned in favour of improving the infrastructure on the existing lines in the area.

This got me thinking.

Whilst we all think of the term infrastructure to mean track, signalling, motive power and rolling stock, there is also the alignment of the railway to take into account. All railway routes across the Pennines involve going up one side and down the other. In the days when they were built, when the opposition was a cart horse or a canal if you were lucky, it didn't really matter much if the lines twisted and turned a bit to ease the gradients for what were, at the time, state of the art but still underpowered steam locomotives. Today, however, things have moved on but those curves and chicanes are still there.

Therefore, as I see it, you could electrify and shave a few minutes off with improved acceleration and reduced dwell times with automatic doors, but if the curvature is such that limits the line speed to, say, 40 mph over some sections, you could be using the most advanced electric stock known to mankind, but it still wouldn't be going any faster around those bends, or across that curve viaduct, than a 156, a 142 or anything Horwich Works was building in the 1890s for passenger work.

What do others think?
To my way of thinking 'infrastructure' refers only to what used to be called 'way and works'. It does not include rolling stock.

As you rightly point out, a curve built in the 1840s for a 40mph balancing speed would still have the same restriction today. Possibly not quite so severe as modern surveying methods allow for improved transition curves and cant change rates - maybe one can get round at 50mph today.
Straightening the alignment for higher speeds has a long history. In open, flattish countryside it is no big deal. It gets expensive if it needs land take, or the geography confines the possible alignments or buildings close to the lineside make purchase and demolition very expensive.

So it all comes down to the calculation of whether the additional income from faster services and/or reduced operating costs can be balanced with the cost of the works. Unless of course political influence can be brought to bear.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page