Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 13:23:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Cal Sleeper runs away at Edinburgh 1st August  (Read 2466 times)
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« on: August 01, 2019, 11:42:08 »

It is being reported on Twitter that stock for the above ran away from Haymarket through Waverley to Abbeyhill.
More brake problems?
https://twitter.com/thesatnav89/status/1156875855165083648?s=21
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2019, 12:52:35 »

It is being reported on Twitter that stock for the above ran away from Haymarket through Waverley to Abbeyhill.
More brake problems?
https://twitter.com/thesatnav89/status/1156875855165083648?s=21

The Scotsman has a lot more on the story ..

Quote
Major commuter rail disruption was caused today by a Caledonian Sleeper train breaking down after failing to stop at Waverley Station.

The train ran through the station before stopping at Abbeyhill to the east, blocking a junction and halting trains to and from North Berwick, Dunbar, Tweedbank and London.

The Sleeper driver is understood to have sent an emergency message to signallers to be able to pass through the station.

[snip] ....

Quote
Ryan Flaherty, Serco’s managing director for Caledonian Sleeper, said: “Our northbound Lowlander service into Edinburgh Waverley this morning overran the platform, due to an earlier operational issue at Carstairs.

"An investigation is underway into the cause of the incident, but early indications are that there are no technical problems with the rolling stock.

"We have notified the relevant authorities.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: August 01, 2019, 14:20:50 »

Quote
Ryan Flaherty, Serco’s managing director for Caledonian Sleeper, said: “Our northbound Lowlander service into Edinburgh Waverley this morning overran the platform, due to an earlier operational issue at Carstairs.

"An investigation is underway into the cause of the incident, but early indications are that there are no technical problems with the rolling stock.

"We have notified the relevant authorities.

Hmmm. But there should be designed in something to *prevent* operator error. It shouldn't be possible to leave something set erroneously.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 01, 2019, 19:01:41 »

Aren't braking systems supposed to be failsafe?
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #4 on: August 02, 2019, 14:57:05 »

If all the cables/pipes are connected up, yup
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7750



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: August 02, 2019, 15:32:43 »

If all the cables/pipes are connected up, yup


…….and from what I understand in that respect, a certain shunter may be having a rather "difficult" interview with his Boss, at which coffee will almost certainly be absent.
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1244



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: August 02, 2019, 17:53:48 »

If all the cables/pipes are connected up, yup

Hence the brake and continuity test before before you move off - I thought ...
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: August 13, 2019, 15:35:53 »

RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) have decided to have a look at this incident. They give a short description of what happened:
Quote
At about 07:26 hrs on Thursday 1 August 2019, train 1B26, the Edinburgh portion of the 23:36 hrs ‘Lowland Sleeper’ service from London Euston, failed to stop as scheduled at Edinburgh Waverley station. It was brought to a stand approximately 650 metres beyond its intended stopping point. There was no damage or any injuries as a consequence of the incident. However, the outcome could potentially have been much worse, had it led to a collision with another train.

The train comprised eight Mark 5 coaches hauled by a Class 92 electric locomotive that had been attached at Carstairs. On the approach to Edinburgh the driver discovered that his train’s braking performance was well below normal. The RAIB’s preliminary investigation indicates that he had no control of the brakes on the coaches because a brake pipe isolating valve was in the closed position when the train left Carstairs station. This meant that the only effective brakes on the train as it approached Edinburgh were those on the locomotive, which were insufficient to maintain control of the train. The train was brought to a stand by the operation of an emergency device in one of the coaches by the Train Manager, which caused the train brakes to apply.

That is, I guess, the obvious way to achieve that result.
Logged
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1469


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: August 13, 2019, 16:08:18 »

The train was brought to a stand by the operation of an emergency device in one of the coaches by the Train Manager, which caused the train brakes to apply.

Would that be the emergency chord in all coaches, or does their (some TOC (Train Operating Company)'s) TM(resolve) have a different stop mechanism?
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 13, 2019, 17:06:06 »

RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) have decided to have a look at this incident. They give a short description of what happened:
Quote
At about 07:26 hrs on Thursday 1 August 2019, train 1B26, the Edinburgh portion of the 23:36 hrs ‘Lowland Sleeper’ service from London Euston, failed to stop as scheduled at Edinburgh Waverley station. It was brought to a stand approximately 650 metres beyond its intended stopping point. There was no damage or any injuries as a consequence of the incident. However, the outcome could potentially have been much worse, had it led to a collision with another train.

The train comprised eight Mark 5 coaches hauled by a Class 92 electric locomotive that had been attached at Carstairs. On the approach to Edinburgh the driver discovered that his train’s braking performance was well below normal. The RAIB’s preliminary investigation indicates that he had no control of the brakes on the coaches because a brake pipe isolating valve was in the closed position when the train left Carstairs station. This meant that the only effective brakes on the train as it approached Edinburgh were those on the locomotive, which were insufficient to maintain control of the train. The train was brought to a stand by the operation of an emergency device in one of the coaches by the Train Manager, which caused the train brakes to apply.

That is, I guess, the obvious way to achieve that result.
The train was brought to a stand by the operation of an emergency device in one of the coaches by the Train Manager, which caused the train brakes to apply.

Would that be the emergency chord in all coaches, or does their (some TOC (Train Operating Company)'s) TM(resolve) have a different stop mechanism?

If the Train (air) Brake Pipe isolating valve (this is the red painted pipe) was closed, the only way the train could have moved was because all the train brakes had been bled down; this also means the Train Main Reservoir Pipe valve (this is the yellow painted pipe) was also closed.   There are 2 reasons why the train brakes would have been bled down, the train needed splitting in the depot for shut reconfiguring or for maintenance by fitters.

The only brake available to the Train Manager would be the hand brake in the guards compartment, which is limited in its effect.

I suspect the RAIB will focus on the train prep process when trains leave a depot or stabling.  Was the driver required by the TOC to carry out a brake test or is this done by the shunters, what are the duties of the TM remember these are different to Guards 
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 751


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: June 01, 2020, 23:20:31 »

The RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) report has now been published:

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/report-052020-loss-of-brake-control-on-a-sleeper-train-approaching-edinburgh

Quote
The driver was unable to stop the train because the brake pipe isolating cock on the leading end of the leading coach was closed. This prevented the brakes on all the coaches from operating when demanded by the driver, although the driver still had control of the brake systems on the locomotive.

The isolating cock became closed during coupling operations when the Edinburgh train was split from the Glasgow train at Carstairs station; this happened after the mandated brake continuity test had been completed. The closure of the valve was therefore undetected prior to the train’s departure from Carstairs. The effectiveness of the brake systems on the locomotive also masked the absence of the coach brakes until the train was approaching Slateford, on the approach to Edinburgh.

Quote
RAIB has made two recommendations. One is addressed to RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board) to change the wording of the railway rule book to make it clear that the brake continuity test should be undertaken after all coupling-related activities have been completed. The second is addressed to Caledonian Sleeper to review the vulnerability of the isolating cocks on its rolling stock, to prevent inadvertent operation by persons or objects.

The report is over forty pages; the above summary doesn't quite do justice to the number of subtleties at work on the night of the incident. The isolating cock was closed accidentally when the crew returned to the coupling area between loco and train to complete the coupling of ETH and communication cables - activities they couldn't perform until the Glasgow portion had been uncoupled.

There are some interesting details about how closing the isolating cock should have vented air from the connection between coaches and loco and why this wasn't detected.

Also notable is the vulnerable position of the isolating cock and connecting piping. This forum has noted incidents in this country and over the channel in which brake systems have been compromised by damage from objects on the p-way, although the RAIB report does not mention these.
Logged
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1469


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: June 02, 2020, 06:46:31 »

I was intrigued by the driver NOT sending a GSM alarm as that could scupper his chances of a through road somewhere by stopping everything.
Although the RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) seemed to imply that wasn't a good idea.  It was a 'do I', 'Don't I' situations and, to me, he did the right thing.
Whilst it's easy to look back on something, when it actually happened, the driver had a lot to do in a very short time.
A brown trouser incident without doubt.
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
eightf48544
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4574


View Profile Email
« Reply #12 on: June 02, 2020, 11:01:17 »

Reading the report it seems to me tha the splitting and adding a loco to rear is a complicated process. Involving working in cramped conditons almost under the coach with  a sensistive isolating cock in the way.

The 61 way jumper also intrigues me. Is it used on other stock? Not like the old days when you could bang two EPBs togther and couple up one jumper and two brake pipes.


Also why do we not have standard couplings?

It reminds me of my OU course on Human Factors in System Design (which was basically a study of various disasters) where by there nearky always a previous non fatal occurance.

Is this the non fatal occurance?




Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page