Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
*** Make campaign for the widest possible support and acceptance - [here]
 25/09/2019 - WWRUG / Transport Focus
03/10/2019 - ACoRP Community Rail Awards
05/10/2019 - WSR shuttle last for 2019
10/10/2019 - IET Signalling Talk - Reading
16/10/2019 - MRUG meeting
16/10/2019 - ACoRP board nominations close
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
September 22, 2019, 01:10:23 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[57] IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent pe...
[56] Templecombe
[55] St.Erth Park and Ride
[49] No steam to Ryde (for a number of years)
[44] 21st September 2019 - RailFuture National Conference, in Brist...
[40] Out of Office quiz - September 2019
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Suggestion: IET internal modifications to make them more buggy friendly  (Read 2560 times)
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7528


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 21, 2019, 09:46:15 am »

A tenth carriage with areas for wheelchairs, buggies and bikes is indeed a possibility, though a costly one and it does nothing to help the 5-car fleet.  I personally donít think the sums for a 10-car extension will add up unless itís entirely used for seating. 

My solution was designed to be quick and cheap to do.  You could probably complete the works on a given unit over a weekend.
Logged

To view my GWML Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Celestial
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 239


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 21, 2019, 11:02:59 am »

It would seem absurd to reduce proper seating to allow for buggies when these should be collapsed on board. Surely better that gateline staff have a supply of leaflets explaining that buggies should be collapsed and the reasons why (emphasising safety). When someone asks to be let through the wide gate with a buggy they are handed the leaflet and asked to read it.  On board staff would also have a few available too.

There could be posters at stations too and maybe in the vestibule areas.

I thought the original idea of young children not paying a fare was that if a seat was needed by another person they would have to sit on the parent's lap. Now we are suggesting taking seats out for them.

What next, specially strengthened seats to take suitcases and a smoking area on board for those that prefer not to obey some of the other rules?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 26531



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #17 on: August 21, 2019, 11:32:43 am »

How radical do you want to be?

Charge the same fare for all ages, with a single range of loyalty railcards - bronze, silver and gold available to everyone offering increased discounts at each level for an increased annual fee.  Revise Groupsave so that discounts can be compounded.

Charge a part fare for bicycles, dogs, buggies, wheelchairs, heavy luggage, owls, surfboards, etc. Whether a flat fare or a proportion of the ticket - to be decides.  Whether loyalty discounts apply on these extras, goodness knows.

Fixed fee for seat reservations, but with a guarantee of a seat.

Your economics for extra carriages and what they should take may start to look better, and I'm sure those of us who from time to time take (in my case) dogs, owls and heavy luggage would not mind paying a bit extra on the occasions we did, if compensated by a bit less on the occasions we didn't ... nor would we mind a small seat reservation fee for those occassions we especially want to be able to be sure of being seated.

I wonder if Williams will be this radical!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest and of RailFuture
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2205


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 21, 2019, 03:13:10 pm »

Hats off to II for considering the matter.

As a pedantic quibble, but also to clarify a possible source of confusion, he talks of "buggies" but the diagram shows what I would call a "pram". Or a "baby carriage" if you want to be Transpondian. The term "buggy" to me suggests something smaller and for a toddler or older baby who is at least sitting up, if not walking. This isn't just a pedantic quibble Ė the crucial difference here is that a buggy folds, prams do not (or at least not without a deal of effort). Also, whereas the pram stage lasts maybe a year at most, the buggy stage lasts several years, so there are more buggies and due to the age, probably more travelling.
Logged

Day return to Infinity, please.
IndustryInsider
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7528


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 21, 2019, 03:31:43 pm »

Thanks, and yes I chose that image for two reasons, firstly it indicated what space the largest item would take up, and secondly as a pictogram it worked much better than overhead views of pushchairs/buggies and I wanted to indicate the likely width so a side-on image wouldnít have been as effective.

You could fit two small pushchairs in the available space if required.

Iím terms of ĎWhy should we provide a space?í  Then I guess that comes down to whether you want to try and make journeys as rewarding and stress free as possible.  Insisting on folding away things takes time and can cause congestion as people behind try to get on.  Other people just ignore leaflets and guidance and will continue to leave them unfolded and abandoned in various other places on the train that causes other issues.
Logged

To view my GWML Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 802


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: August 22, 2019, 09:34:31 am »

I can see the merit of this suggestion, the only real drawback IMHO is that it panders to those who refuse to fold buggies and thereby occupy excessive space.

Generally my experience is that sleeping children in buggies object quite vociferously to being folded up. My experience is also that other passengers donít particularly welcome vociferous children...

II, this is an excellent suggestion. Providing freeform luggage space like this would improve travel for everyone with buggies, suitcases and bikes. These seats are inevitably only used on very busy services in any case.
Logged
mjray
Full Member
***
Posts: 31


View Profile Email
« Reply #21 on: August 22, 2019, 12:46:34 pm »

A bit OTT to have a whole coach fitted out thus, but perhaps about one quarter or one third of a coach might be reasonable, it would be what we used to call the guard's van or luggage van, but would need re branding these days.
"multi functional facility" or some such.
Belgium's SNCB/NMBS calls them "multi-functional areas" and I've found it to be generally one carriage of 10 (or the lower deck of a shorter double-decker, or half a carriage of a shorter single-decker). Some double-deckers have low-level exit doors but they can only be opened by the guard. See https://cheeseweb.eu/2015/06/bike-belgian-trains-stepbystep-guide/ although the Liege-Lux service now has carriages with an open area too.

The Netherlands's NS seemed to have thirds of some coaches as open spaces but labels them variously as luggage or 4-bike spaces (despite 6 fitting easily and 8 is possible on most with careful stacking, sometimes more, all with none blocking gangways), causing needless conflict and delay if you've a rules-enforcing guard and a different mix of luggage/bikes/passengers to what the builders expected.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2768



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 22, 2019, 03:24:33 pm »


Generally my experience is that sleeping children in buggies object quite vociferously to being folded up. My experience is also that other passengers donít particularly welcome vociferous children...

II, this is an excellent suggestion. Providing freeform luggage space like this would improve travel for everyone with buggies, suitcases and bikes. These seats are inevitably only used on very busy services in any case.

AFAIK, the child, sleeping or otherwise is meant to be removed BEFORE folding the buggy. I would expect the child to object vociferously if folded up with the buggy. Some makes of buggy have instructions that read "WARNING, REMOVE CHILD BEFORE FOLDING"
Most children do not come with instructions.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 802


View Profile Email
« Reply #23 on: August 22, 2019, 06:19:18 pm »

The problem is that waking the child also sets off the vociferous chain of events!
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2205


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: August 22, 2019, 09:34:23 pm »

Very small children IME have a natural inclinometer. They can fall asleep in any position but once asleep, will wake and initiate the aforementioned vociferous chain of events the instant they are laid on a horizontal surface. If by chance they happen to fall asleep in a horizontal position, they will wake the instant they are are raised or lowered, no matter how gently, with the same effects.
Logged

Day return to Infinity, please.
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 442


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 22, 2019, 09:56:29 pm »

Back to II's initial suggestion  it seems sensible to me.

If he puts in an order for tip up seats, can he order a few extra please so they can be installed in the two substantial wheelchair spaces in the centre coaches of "refurbished" Turbos, so a few more folk can sit down when these spaces are not in use (dare I say, as is usually the case) for wheelchairs?
Logged
MVR S&T, was justdarkbeer
Full Member
***
Posts: 95


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: August 22, 2019, 10:17:11 pm »

Having all these spaces for wheelchairs, buggys, priority seats on the train is all very well, but getting from the platform on to and out of the train, is more of an issue. remember any of us may need a wheelchair/pram one day..

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-49434911

Logged
bignosemac
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 16989


Coffee Shop Forum Roving Reporter


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 22, 2019, 11:21:51 pm »

Having all these spaces for wheelchairs, buggys, priority seats on the train is all very well, but getting from the platform on to and out of the train, is more of an issue. remember any of us may need a wheelchair/pram one day..

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-49434911

On that point, I've started a dedicated topic about this latest TOC failing to provide for a disabled traveller:
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=22116.0
Logged

Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2205


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 23, 2019, 12:59:20 am »

Having all these spaces for wheelchairs, buggys, priority seats on the train is all very well, but getting from the platform on to and out of the train, is more of an issue. remember any of us may need a wheelchair/pram one day..

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-49434911


One at each end of life, often!
Logged

Day return to Infinity, please.
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 652



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 23, 2019, 07:02:31 am »

I think I read it on these boards first - we are all born disabled.

I made my pram into the most exciting trolley. The fun I had with that ...
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page