Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum Great Western Coffee Shop - [home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register and contribute [here] - it's free.
article index - [here]
 tomorrow - MRUG meeting
tomorrow - ACoRP board nominations close
18/10/2019 - TravelWatch SouthWest
18/10/2019 - GWR meet the team - Westbury
19/10/2019 - MRUG/CS "Thank you" BBQ
21/10/2019 - Ticket booking test - BRI
Random Image
Train Running @GWR Twitter Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4 Chat on off
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 15, 2019, 02:02:37 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[94] London Overground - proposed ticket office reduction of hours
[84] Restoration of original prototype HST to service
[56] Climate Change Emergency - Implications for UK Transport Strat...
[52] IETs into passenger service from 16 Oct 2017 and subsequent pe...
[47] Collapse of Thomas Cook
[44] On crossing borders by public transport - to and within the UK...
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Hinkley point C update  (Read 1924 times)
infoman
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 126


View Profile
« on: September 03, 2019, 10:39:54 am »

A jetty has now been built near the construction site,

which will result in a reduction in the amount of large lorrys heading to and from Hinlkey C.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4535


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 12, 2019, 03:51:32 pm »

Now complemented by the world's biggest crane, as reported by the BBC
Logged

Now, please!
Red Squirrel
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3186


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 12, 2019, 04:56:52 pm »

Now complemented by the world's biggest crane, as reported by the BBC

I got fairly close to it the other week, and can vouch for the fact that it is a whopper. They also claim to have the world's tallest crane on site; but for some reason while they were talking superlatives they didn't mention the fact that they'll be producing the world's most expensive electricity...
Logged
bignosemac
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 17036


Coffee Shop Forum Roving Reporter


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 12, 2019, 06:02:46 pm »

Said crane will be featuring on BBC Points West this evening, 12tb September 2019.
Logged

broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2808



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 12, 2019, 07:02:25 pm »

Said crane will be featuring on BBC Points West this evening, 12tb September 2019.

It did, interesting viewing. Featured on both the BBC and on ITV.
Certainly impressive, though I remain doubtful about the project on both technical and financial grounds.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4535


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 12, 2019, 07:47:52 pm »

It did, interesting viewing. Featured on both the BBC and on ITV.
Certainly impressive, though I remain doubtful about the project on both technical and financial grounds.

Also, it lacks a buffet.
Logged

Now, please!
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 304



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 12, 2019, 10:03:08 pm »

they didn't mention the fact that they'll be producing the world's most expensive electricity...

If it is a fixed price, by the time it's up and running it may well be the cheapest !
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2808



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 13, 2019, 01:44:23 am »

It did, interesting viewing. Featured on both the BBC and on ITV.
Certainly impressive, though I remain doubtful about the project on both technical and financial grounds.

Also, it lacks a buffet.

Not so, there is an excellent buffet/self service restaurant in the workers village, to which I have been invited and enjoyed an excellent meal.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2808



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 13, 2019, 04:46:05 pm »

they didn't mention the fact that they'll be producing the world's most expensive electricity...

If it is a fixed price, by the time it's up and running it may well be the cheapest !

AFAIK the price is not truly fixed at the oft quoted 92-50 per MWH, but is "fixed" at 92-50 PLUS INFLATION.
So if the power station opens in 20 years time, the price could be several times that figure due to inflation.
If other energy sources increase in price by the same percentage in the same time interval, then the nuclear electricity would still be much more expensive than the alternatives.

I expect that natural gas, and electricity generated therefrom, will increase in price more rapidly than the general inflation rate.
I expect that wind and solar energy will increase in price by less than the general inflation rate.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4535


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 13, 2019, 10:22:21 pm »

AFAIK the price is not truly fixed at the oft quoted 92-50 per MWH, but is "fixed" at 92-50 PLUS INFLATION.


My understanding also. The whole thing is utterly baffling. That 92.50 per MWH has been described by some as an illegal state subsidy, while 155 per MWH for offshore wind, which was the case in for new plants opening in 2014, 100 per MWH for what few onshore schemes were built and 125 for solar, were not. Now, I'm no Harry Redknapp when it comes to accountancy, but that doesn't seem right. New offshore wind has a much smaller strike price, with two developers agreeing to 57.50 per MWH a couple of years back and thus scooping the pool in the sea, as it were. The next round of auctions is due next year - I think.

The energy suppliers don't get the strike price as a subsidy, but are paid a top-up to it if the wholesale price is lower. If wholesale prices go above the strike price, the companies have to pay the excess to the Low Carbon Contracts Company, which admnisters the scheme. The wholesale price fluctuates widely. At the time the Hinkley price was agreed, it was over 50 per MWH, and had been as high as 90 back in 2008. If it goes back to that by the time Hinkley C opens, then the subsidy will be minimal, and at least partially paid for by the profits of the newest offshore wind operators. The current electricity wholesale price is around 35 pMWH, meaning that practically every renewable energy producer working under a Contract for Difference receives a subsidy.

The various strike prices are published in the CfD register which I looked at for the first time an hour ago. Inflation means that Hinkley C is now at a price of 101.99 pMWH. That sounds a lot until you remember that it will not be paid anything until it actually produces electricity. More expensive plants exist - there are a number of offshore wind farms working at a strike price of 170.03 pMWH. This means that for every megawatt hour they produce, they are paid 35 by the electricity companies and 135 in subsidy. Hinkley C, with its "illegal state subsidy", is positively cheap in comparison. There are other technologies -  Drax biomass power station has a strike price of 113.65. It burns around 7.5 million tonnes of biomass annually, most of it wood pellets imported from the US and Canada, a quantity that would require some 12,000 km2 of forest to sustain, and which doesn't sound particularly green to me. There are still new onshore windfarms popping up, mainly in Scotland, with strike prices around 93.

The highest proportion of our electricity is produced by combined cycle gas turbines these days, and the low price of gas is what is keeping wholesale electricity prices down. We produce just under half of our gas, import around 47% from Norway and Europe, and import around a tenth as liquefied natural gas from Qatar. A high electricity price would benefit government greatly, as it would reduce the subsidies, but that wouldn't help us consumers much. Solar was excluded from the last round of contracts for difference, possibly bevcause it is now seen as cheap enough to manage on its own. Onshore wind doesn't produce the volumes seen at sea and annoys people in the areas where it is sited. Both types require constant maintenance, offshore much more so. The design life of a 100 metre wind turbine is 25 years, but few will make it that far, usually becoming uneconomic to repair by 17 years. The power output is variable, so is not to be depended upon for the base load, formerly provided by coal. Nuclear power stations run best at full power, producing a much flatter graph than wind, and still working in the dark, unlike solar. Hinkley C has a planned operational  life of 60 years. Hinkley B has been running for 43 years so far.

For the future, it looks like more nuclear is on the way for base load, with wind and solar backed up by CCGT supplying most of the rest, unless someone comes up with a new technology that works. New homes are built to a higher standard of energy efficiency, but there are still millions of draughty old ones. That needs a proper plan to sort it out, and there shouldn't be an incandescent light bulb shining anywhere. But the whole issue of energy policy is a total dog's breakfast, and we seem a lot less prepared for the future than a lot of other countries, although we have practically ended coal-fired generation. That is in contrast to America, where a quarter of electricity is produced by coal, or Germany, at around 40%. China is reported to be building two new coal-fired plants per month.

The rush to renewable energy has had unintended consequences. The BBC news reported today on the rise of sulphur hexafluoride - SF6 - in the atmosphere. This is used in electrical switch gear to suppress arcing and prevent fires, and the rise of relatively small scale power generators has meant a big rise in its use. It leaks occasionally, is thousands of times more potent than carbon dioxide as a greenhouse gas, and doesn't degrade. As we solve one problem, so we cause another.
.

« Last Edit: September 13, 2019, 10:29:13 pm by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2808



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 29, 2019, 12:28:38 pm »

The cost of Hinkley C has increased by another few billion partly due to "ground conditions more challenging than expected" and the planned opening has been delayed.

The extra costs should fall entirely upon the backers of this project. I have a cynical suspicion that some way will be found to bail the project out with public money.

Living in the general area, I have observed a new road sign "twinned with Fukushima" Which I suspect to be not official. A bit like the "Twinned with Atlantis" signs that appeared during the bad flooding of a few years ago.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2808



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 29, 2019, 03:04:16 pm »

Road sign.

https://www.deviantart.com/peteharlow/art/Somerset-twinned-with-Atlantis-713690861
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page