Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
- Man suffers life-threatening injuries after train stabbing
- Baltimore Bridge Collapse
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:57 Swansea to London Paddington
07:43 Swansea to London Paddington
08:18 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
08:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
09:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
09:12 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
09:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
06:38 Weymouth to Gloucester
06:54 Taunton to London Paddington
08:34 Exeter Central to Okehampton
08:38 London Paddington to Westbury
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
05:23 London Paddington to Swansea
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 09:13 Bristol Temple Meads to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 London Paddington to Oxford
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 09:25:34 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[146] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[117] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[80] Return of the BRUTE?
[63] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[27] CrossCountry upgrade will see 25% more rail seats
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Linked Events
  • UK General Election: December 12, 2019
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
Author Topic: General election - policies on Transport - what should we look or ask for?  (Read 8632 times)
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 15, 2019, 22:13:35 »

Quote
How many miles of track and/or new stations would that equate to?

Half a Reading reconstruction and associated works at 2015 prices, I reckon
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #16 on: November 16, 2019, 06:01:14 »

There are a lot of posts around at the moment / questions as to funamentals such as who should run the railways.  A combination of the election campaign, perceived problmems with the franchising system and inquiries for the likes of the Williams report have brought this to the fore and there's all sort of stuff on social media.  From my feed at https://www.facebook.com/philvr/posts/2758701990841447 shared from https://www.facebook.com/966163353563533/photos/a.966174170229118/1280990762080789/


Yeah, right ...

The pacer trains in current service were built in 1985 rather than 1980 (classes 140 and 141 were withdrawn by 1997) and were built new using new components to the same design as bus components - not (as far as I know) recycled pieces from buses. It is true that they have lasted nearly twice as long as was originally intended - so have many other trains; if it ain't bust, dont fis it. They are not (never have been?) in used in London and the South East, in Scotland, or in Northern Ireland - so not really "across the UK (United Kingdom)". And I can't think of any journey that could be made on a pacer which could be made by air, even before we start doing a price comparison.

Vienns to Budapest ... cheapest fare £39, I believe,  Please check, but that new figure comes from the follow up comments on Facebook, which the original poster has admitted may be the cheapest fare (though online I can find other intermediate figures).  Vienna to Budapest is avout 250km - about the same as London to Cardiff, which I can buy in advance for £35.50 (many fares at around £40, occasionally £27.50)

I would rather suspect that members here wouldn't be very happy about having a pacer run a scheduled London to Cardiff services, nor would something like the trains used from Paris to Zurich be suitable for the Barry Island to Aberdare service. Th epost compares apples to hamburgers!

So - having concluded that there are some errors and inaccurcies in social media posts such as this one, what would a balanced comparison look like?  I found a (2017) comparison at BCG (not sure who they are, but data and methods smell good)  They look at:

Quote
The RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector (or Retail Price Index, depending on the context)) measures the performance of railway systems in three dimensions for both passenger and freight traffic:
* Intensity of Use. To what extent is rail transport used by passengers and freight companies?
* Quality of Service. Are the trains punctual and fast, and is rail travel affordable?
* Safety. Does the railway system adhere to the highest safety standards

We confined the analysis to these dimensions to create an indicator that is comprehensive yet easy to understand. Each dimension comprises at least two subdimensions, and all were given equal weight. (See Exhibit 1.) We rescaled the data to represent a score of 0 to 10 for each subdimension. To create the index, we then combined the ­ratings for each dimension and subdimension based on their weighting.


I'll leave forum mambers to read that report ... which puts the UK at the top of "tier 2" (of 3) - 8th out of 25 countries looked at.

Quote
Great Britain. At 5.4, Great Britain has an excellent rating for safety. However, its rating for intensity of use is only good, owing to a low level of freight utilization, and its quality of service is poor because of high fares and the relatively low punctuality of regional trains.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: November 16, 2019, 07:35:56 »

After reading the above posts, it’s clear to see why we don’t see much in the way of reopening stations and lines...it’s so jolly expensive!
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: November 16, 2019, 08:09:10 »

..and I've just realised that the £500m will just be for consultants' fees for preparing the planning applications Grin
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: November 16, 2019, 11:23:36 »

BCG are Boston Consulting Group. The thing that immediately stands out from that graph is Tier 3 is the ex-socialist countries of Eastern Europe (plus Portugal and Ireland). They've pursued various paths of rail privatization since and probably don't have much in common (particularly with Portugal and Ireland) other than a generally lower GDP. It could be as simple as that.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: November 17, 2019, 12:17:26 »

Good to see the BCG report has GB (Great Britain) near the top on safety. We should not have to choose, but if we do that is the one I would have as a priority. Interesting the take on intensity of use when we know so many of the issues  about our railways are capacity constraints. 
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: November 17, 2019, 12:39:08 »

An interesting quote from the BCG Report that Grahame refferenced is of relevance to party policies and the General Election:

Quote
As in previous RPI (Revenue Protection Inspector (or Retail Price Index, depending on the context)) studies, we compared each country’s overall RPI rating with its public cost (again, the sum of public subsidies and investments in the system). Public subsidies are recurring government contributions that support passenger and freight operations and infrastructure maintenance (excluding investment subsidies). Public investments are one-time government and company investments in infrastructure construction projects.

Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: November 17, 2019, 18:56:36 »

So - looks like you get what you pay for.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #23 on: November 29, 2019, 20:17:20 »

From Railway World

Quote
Railways and the 2019 General Election

Transport and the railways was never going to take centre stage in an election that is dominated by Brexit and the NHS, but with all the manifestos now published there are a pretty wide range of promises being made to improve and expand our rail services.

So, without fear or favour, here is a review of what is being said by all the political parties on the future of our railways, looking in particular at four key topics, namely ownership and control, HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)), electrification and network expansion/re-openings.

I am going - at the risk (!) of being a bit selective

Quote
Here the most curious reference seems to be the Conservative Party, which singles out Fleetwood and Willenhall as places that have “suffered permanent disadvantage” after being removed from the rail network, but makes no mention of the many other viable re-opening schemes that have been under discussion for a long time.

Speculation - might this be something to do with two constituencies ...

Lancaster and Fleetwood. (Held by the Conservatives to 2015 then Labour more recently)

Walsall North. (Held by Labour until 2017 when it went Conservative)

Further down, talking of all the parties

Quote
So an election full of remarkable and hugely expensive promises when it comes to transport and the railway, though if I was a voter in somewhere like Portishead, Wisbech or Ashington who had been waiting decades for my railway to re-open, only to be let down time and again by successive governments as the cost spiralled, I might well take it all with a large pinch of salt!

North Somerset - Conservative, strong majority
North East Cambridgeshire - Conservative, strong majority
Wansbeck - Labour, strong majority
« Last Edit: November 29, 2019, 20:26:14 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #24 on: November 29, 2019, 22:38:56 »

North Somerset - Conservative, strong majority

That's an interesting one, grahame.

In terms of the current MP (Member of Parliament), Dr Liam Fox: he is indeed in a secure seat.

However, in our recent local council elections, the Conservatives were absolutely annihilated - the deputy leader even lost his seat (to spend more time with his helicopters, perhaps) and there is not one Conservative on the new executive.  Roll Eyes

The impetus to restore the Portishead branch line to passenger service must be maintained, however.  Lips sealed

Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #25 on: December 02, 2019, 05:42:05 »

From the Independent

Quote
Up to three-quarters off train fares and free travel for under-16s – that is Labour’s promise to rail passengers if elected.

An across-the-board 33 per cent cut in regulated fares would take effect from January 2020 – replacing the planned 2.7 per cent increase announced by train operators.

In addition, a crucial change in pricing for rush-hour tickets would see some fares fall by as much as 74 per cent.

[snip]

Andy McDonald, the shadow transport secretary, said Britain has “one of the most complex, exploitative and expensive ticketing systems in the world” as a result of privatisation.

[snip]

His party’s most radical proposal is to cut the cost of single peak fares to one-tenth of the cost of a one-week season ticket. On a journey such as Brighton to London Victoria, the effects would be dramatic.

If implemented as described - examples

Peak single, Melksham to Paddington down from £88.50 to £28.23 (or £18.91)
Peak single, Melksham to Swindon down from £8.60 to £4.26 (or £2.92)
First figure - current peak single.  Second - a tenth of current 7 day season. Third - that will extra 33% off

Will the trains have sufficient peak capacity for extra traffic generated?
Where is the extra income stream to make up the difference?
Who will buy weekly seasons in the future - does this rocket the number of transactions?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: December 02, 2019, 06:49:46 »

Ooooooooooo's gonna pay for it?  Smiley
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40687



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #27 on: December 02, 2019, 07:19:40 »

Ooooooooooo's gonna pay for it?  Smiley

I think that's the colloquial form of

Where is the extra income stream to make up the difference?

 Grin Grin


Of course, not all reductions would be as spectacular as the peak single examples ... but still (with 33% general reduction) I would expect the typical fare to halve.    More than double the number of passengers and you'll be back to the same income level, though I expect you would have some (understatement) overcrowding issues - especially in the peak as the financial persuasion to travel off peak would be much reduced.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: December 02, 2019, 13:22:14 »

Even by the standards of this election campaign, that fares pledge by Labour is extraordinary.  The industry simply isn’t ready, willing or able to cope with the fallout from it.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: December 02, 2019, 14:21:43 »

Even by the standards of this election campaign, that fares pledge by Labour is extraordinary.  The industry simply isn’t ready, willing or able to cope with the fallout from it.
But unfortunately if the industry tries to explain the fallout, they’ll just be portrayed as causing the problem.  Difficult to see where a realistic response to this comes from...

Paul
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page