Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:24 Exmouth to Paignton
07:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
07:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Penzance
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 08:27:05 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[77] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[72] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[70] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[63] Return of the BRUTE?
[56] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[44] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: HS2 - the dissenting report  (Read 7097 times)
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7747



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: January 11, 2020, 10:55:47 »

If that was genuinely your intention, why stereotype so lazily at all?

Tongue, Cheek, therein.

And there is an element (who, yes, I lazily stereotyped) who seem to have an influence far out of proportion to their numbers.  I live in a county where around 66% of the population lives in urban settings, just 34% rural.  And a coupe of years back I looked the the composition of the (unitary) county's cabinet, noting that 18 out of 19 represented rural wards.  In Melksham, five out of six wards are urban in character, yet three out of six of the public "area board" meetings are held away form the centre - explained to me to "make sure we include the villages".

But the "country squires" if you call them that are, indeed, far from the only ones who care for the countryside. Which comment aligns with my original comment.

I think it's probably a good idea to focus on grahame's stereotyping. With luck, it might even distract people's attention from the fact that Tony Berkeley's own 'dissenting report' has blown the anti-HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) case so far out of the water that it's in danger of going into orbit.

Doing my best to stoke that fire, Red Squirrel!

Here's some fuel for your woodburner.

(Fewer places for foxes to hide from those ghastly country folk too Graham!)  Wink

Expect plenty more of this...………….

https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2020/jan/10/hs2-destroyed-trees-in-way-of-train-line-without-permission

(As a member of the BBOWT I guess I should declare an interest).
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: January 11, 2020, 12:35:55 »

It's absolutely right that HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) Ltd and/or its contractors should be held to account if, as appears to be the case, they have broken the law.

I fear that TG is right, and that there will be more incidents like this. In at massive project like HS2, there are sure to be mistakes and perhaps worse. This in no way weakens the case for HS2, though; it just makes a strong case for better management.

Calvert Jubliee Nature Reserve, where this incident occurred, is the site of an old landfill and brickworks adjacent to Calvert Junction. East-West Rail's route runs along the northern boundary of the site, whilst HS2's route is on the eastern edge of the reserve along the old Great Central trackbed.

HS2 Ltd plan to plant 75,000 trees in mitigation.

« Last Edit: January 11, 2020, 14:28:22 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: January 11, 2020, 14:28:36 »

A little detail I missed:

Quote
Work which eradicated habitat where bats could roost was carried out in December, despite the government having ordered that “irreversible” destruction of ancient woodland  should be halted unless deemed absolutely necessary while HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) is under review.
Source: The Guardian, my highlighting

It's that word 'ancient'... Surely the trackbed of the Great Central as it runs past an old council tip cannot, by any stretch of anyone's imagination, be considered to be ancient woodland?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #33 on: January 11, 2020, 14:45:30 »

It's that word 'ancient'... Surely the trackbed of the Great Central as it runs past an old council tip cannot, by any stretch of anyone's imagination, be considered to be ancient woodland?

You would be surprised how quickly a section of ex-railway becomes a stronghold of nature, if not "ancient".  Not the only example - look to the issues that the Kent and East Sussex Railway has had getting the trackbed from Robertsbridge to Junction Road (about 4km out)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: January 11, 2020, 14:53:11 »

It's that word 'ancient'... Surely the trackbed of the Great Central as it runs past an old council tip cannot, by any stretch of anyone's imagination, be considered to be ancient woodland?

You would be surprised how quickly a section of ex-railway becomes a stronghold of nature, if not "ancient".  Not the only example - look to the issues that the Kent and East Sussex Railway has had getting the trackbed from Robertsbridge to Junction Road (about 4km out)

But "ancient woodland" is a technical term (though perhaps not a protected one). According to the Woodland Trust:
Quote
What is ancient woodland? Ancient woods are areas of woodland that have persisted since 1600 in England and Wales, and 1750 in Scotland. This is when maps started to be reasonably accurate so we can tell that these areas have had tree cover for hundreds of years. They are relatively undisturbed by human development.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: January 11, 2020, 15:36:29 »

It's that word 'ancient'... Surely the trackbed of the Great Central as it runs past an old council tip cannot, by any stretch of anyone's imagination, be considered to be ancient woodland?

You would be surprised how quickly a section of ex-railway becomes a stronghold of nature, if not "ancient".  Not the only example - look to the issues that the Kent and East Sussex Railway has had getting the trackbed from Robertsbridge to Junction Road (about 4km out)

As a long-time walker and cycler (if that's a word!) of old railway lines, I wouldn't. It's astonishing how quickly nature can recover if we just give it half a chance. Even a council tip can become an important wildlife haven in a relatively short time.

Knepp is an interesting case in point. In just 20 years it has gone from failing farm to internationally-important wildlife resource - and is now profitable. One might hope that some of HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))'s mitigation follows this kind of lead.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 689


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: January 11, 2020, 16:26:27 »

... (As a member of the BBOWT I guess I should declare an interest).

On a personal note, so am I, and I do voluntary work on several of its sites in West Berkshire. Another site (not a BBOWT one) is Furze Hill, Hermitage, which includes a short stretch of the old Didcot, Newbury and Southampton line. Furze Hill is the site of a former brickworks close to where Pinewood Halt was and which was served by a siding, with a narrow-gauge railway inside the works.

At Furze Hill now are a housing development, large new village hall and playing fields, with some land being returned to nature. Every now and then we go along the former trackbed almost to the M4 cutting back growth. A couple of us, supported by contractors, have just extended the path along the bed the other side of the motorway bridge to Hampstead Norreys.

Nothing much of the old railway is to be seen, apart from a few fence posts, though there a couple of bridges to the south - and I think that the former Ministry of Supply cold store, once served by two sidings, still stands.

Marlburian

Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: January 11, 2020, 20:30:58 »

Quote
Quote from: TaplowGreen on Today at 10:55:47 am
... (As a member of the BBOWT I guess I should declare an interest).

On a personal note, so am I,

That makes at least three of us then...!
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: January 12, 2020, 09:04:01 »

A little detail I missed:

Quote
Work which eradicated habitat where bats could roost was carried out in December, despite the government having ordered that “irreversible” destruction of ancient woodland  should be halted unless deemed absolutely necessary while HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) is under review.
Source: The Guardian, my highlighting

It's that word 'ancient'... Surely the trackbed of the Great Central as it runs past an old council tip cannot, by any stretch of anyone's imagination, be considered to be ancient woodland?

Indeed. And "habitat where bats could roost" is by no means the same as "habitat where bats are roosting", any more than the muddy puddle in the road is a "habitat where newts could live", although they probably will. If anything, it makes sense to so the work now. Not only are the bats away, but birds are not nesting. Both will go somewhere else.

You are getting old when ancient woodland starts to look young. The Beeching forest is not ancient.
Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #39 on: January 12, 2020, 09:53:18 »

Here is another dissenting suggestion from the Mail Online

Quote
Transport adviser Andrew Gilligan urges Boris Johnson to axe HS2 in the South and instead use the money in the new Tory 'heartlands' of the North
* Transport adviser lobbies new Conservative MPs (Member of Parliament) to scrap HS2's southern route
* Andrew Gilligan advocates cancellation of phase one Birmingham to London leg
* Mr Gilligan has been closely linked to Mr Johnson since leaving the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) in 2004
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7747



View Profile
« Reply #40 on: January 12, 2020, 10:24:23 »

Here is another dissenting suggestion from the Mail Online

Quote
Transport adviser Andrew Gilligan urges Boris Johnson to axe HS2 in the South and instead use the money in the new Tory 'heartlands' of the North
* Transport adviser lobbies new Conservative MPs (Member of Parliament) to scrap HS2's southern route
* Andrew Gilligan advocates cancellation of phase one Birmingham to London leg
* Mr Gilligan has been closely linked to Mr Johnson since leaving the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) in 2004

Removing the politics from the equation, and by way of an attempt to forestall the frothing at the mouth that citing the Mail inevitably provokes, he isn't alone in that view.

https://www.theengineer.co.uk/poll-reducing-cost-hs2/

(from before the election)
« Last Edit: January 12, 2020, 10:35:17 by TaplowGreen » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: January 12, 2020, 10:35:31 »

Removing the politics from the equation...

Trouble is, like it on not, politics is a fundamental part of the equation. 

So is ‘frothing at the mouth’.  From both sides of the argument.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7747



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: January 12, 2020, 10:54:17 »

Removing the politics from the equation...

Trouble is, like it on not, politics is a fundamental part of the equation. 

So is ‘frothing at the mouth’.  From both sides of the argument.

Public opinion is a fundamental part of the equation, and it tends to drive political considerations, (as Mr Corbyn has recently discovered), and I'd suggest that an article written prior to the election, in a specialist engineering publication with little or no political profile, is considerably more objective than that in the Mail, or the Rail/pro HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) lobby?

Citing articles in the Mail is often used deliberately to invite scorn to be poured upon them by default - when the view is backed up in the way the article in the Engineer supports (albeit arguably with different motivations), it should give pause for thought.



Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: January 12, 2020, 11:52:44 »

Public opinion is a fundamental part of the equation, and it tends to drive political considerations, (as Mr Corbyn has recently discovered), and I'd suggest that an article written prior to the election, in a specialist engineering publication with little or no political profile, is considerably more objective than that in the Mail, or the Rail/pro HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) lobby?

I quite agree - public opinion at the ballot box (though with HS2 as a very minor part of most people's thinking) gave the Tory party a large majority, and as a result the ability to pretty much do what they want.  So, it now shifts in that 'public opinion' of HS2 in itself matters very little, rightly or wrongly, and it is now much more about politics and keeping all Boris's new MPs (Member of Parliament) happy.  With a lot of those in the Midlands and north of England, it might actually mean projects specifically for that area get priority over HS2, or HS2 magically gets started in the north and scaled back further south - we'll just have to wait and see.  Either way, it looks like scrapping entirely it like you, and a few others on this forum, would wish, is the least likely option.

Quote
Citing articles in the Mail is often used deliberately to invite scorn to be poured upon them by default - when the view is backed up in the way the article in the Engineer supports (albeit arguably with different motivations), it should give pause for thought.

There should be no surprise that a poll of public opinion in any journal gives a high percentage of people saying it 'should be scrapped' - after all, most people just keep hearing about massive cost increases and the fact all it does is save 20 minutes on a journey from London to Birmingham.  It remains an unpopular project amongst the general public, but that doesn't mean it's not a sensible idea. 

Readers of The Engineer are likely to be better informed than most, but still not particularly well informed (the quote from a John Hartley in the link you quoted demonstrates that perfectly) about exactly what HS2 is being built for - mostly to add capacity on a creaking old network.  Now it is becoming clearer just what the alternative upgrades to that creaking old network will cost if HS2 doesn't go ahead, perhaps some will change their minds?
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #44 on: January 12, 2020, 12:02:22 »

The costs could be brought under control by changing the rather stupid procurement model that forces the contractors to heavily over-engineer, for example, the earthworks so that they are not subject to even minor settlement.  Routine maintenance of the structures would be a much cheaper way of dealing with that, but if you want to avoid it you are essentially asking for a viaduct rather than an embankment. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page