Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 19:37:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: SWR - Threat of Franchise Removal  (Read 1524 times)
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 642


View Profile
« on: January 07, 2020, 21:51:50 »

Seems the FT have got wind of this tonight

https://twitter.com/FT/status/1214664501985005573
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2020, 21:55:50 »

Its also in the Guardian without a paywall

Quote
The strike-hit South Western Railway (SWR» (South Western Railway - about)) franchise faces the prospect of nationalisation after its accounts revealed “significant doubt” that it could see out the year without going bust.

The train company’s directors said it was uncertain that it could fulfil the terms of its franchise, while a £146m cash injection from its parent groups was likely to be used up before the end of 2020.

Filings to Companies House from December, published on Tuesday, showed that the train operator, a joint venture between FirstGroup and the Hong Kong-based MTR, lost £137m in the year to March 2019.

SWR directors said in the accounts there was “material uncertainty that may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern”. The company’s auditors, Deloitte, signed off the accounts but highlighted the directors’ statement.

The article continues
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2020, 22:21:56 »

This was posted on the WNXX (Stored Unserviceable, Mainline Locos HQ All Classes) Forum: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/ENsOOJ8WwAAqu3m?format=jpg&name=medium
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2020, 23:52:36 »

I find the ways this is being labelled rather odd. It's not really renationalisation to transfer the service (and staff) to a new management team (I understand they are consultants and contractors, not DfT» (Department for Transport - about) staff), and SWR» (South Western Railway - about) have been in talks about wanting to change the contract for over a year. So I read the latest stage as SWR/First saying enough is enough - if they don't get the changes they want, the contract gets it. It's a threat ... of sorts.

I couldn't find a report on the forum of the contract issue, so here's an old one from Railnews:
Quote
Posted 14th November 2018 ...
In its latest statement to the Stock Exchange for the six months to 30 September this year, First warns that the forecast profits from SWR are now ‘uncertain’, while SWR is also continuing its efforts to improve performance and settle the continuing dispute over on-train staffing with the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers). This dispute makes its own contribution to reducing performance levels when services are disrupted by strikes.

However, it is the Central London Employment mechanism which appears to be causing much of the current concern. The CLE clause is intended to share the risks equably between the DfT and franchisees, but SWR is the second franchise to question its effectiveness within a few weeks, because Greater Anglia is also unhappy for the same reason.

First says: ‘There is uncertainty regarding the outcomes of this mechanism over the remaining franchise term, which has the potential to significantly impact the profitability of the franchise. We are reviewing the effectiveness of this mechanism and whether it is functioning as originally intended by both parties.’...

Moreover, when Grayling told MPs (Member of Parliament) what he'd finally done about VTEC, in May 2018, he said this:
Quote
However, as I explained in February, Stagecoach and Virgin Trains got their bid wrong and they are now paying a price. They will have lost nearly £200 million meeting their contracted commitments.

This means taxpayers have not lost out because revenues are lower than predicted: only Virgin Trains East Coast and its parent companies have made losses at this time.

As the Brown review said in 2013, in an effective railway industry, franchises can occasionally fail. But we do not expect companies to hold unlimited liabilities when they take on franchises, they would not bid for them if they had to. This will mean sometimes franchises will fail. That is why it was a Conservative government that created the structures for the Operator of Last Resort – to ensure we can always guarantee passengers’ services if franchises cannot continue.

I was surprised at the time no-one picked up on that, as it is the clearest statement I'd seen that neither DfT nor any TOC (Train Operating Company) understood the franchise to require the whole premium to be paid no matter how big a loss the operator was making. In effect the premium is just another kind of profit share; but having tried other splits they have ended up with this rather extreme variety with a fixed sum.

Contracts have been made with operating subsidiaries (or JVs) backed by TOCs, and with a guarantee (or bond) which sets a minimum level of loss before a TOC can get out. In practice they will lose a lot more than that, as it takes time even to go bust. But I can see that is this how it has be, or as the man said no TOC would sign one.

Which leads us back to the question ... why did First/MTR sign a contract with that CLE in it if it was  going to work so badly for them? Or GA (Greater Anglia) come to that, recently reported to also be getting more worked up about it (though they were reported as being Dutch civil servants).
Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 08, 2020, 00:05:24 »

... and Northern ...and Transpennine Express.

The franchising model, and the great Tory privatisation adventure is completely broken.

Concession models, as used in London, or full renationalisation are the only answers.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 08, 2020, 08:02:16 »

Analysis by BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) South Today's Paul Clifton
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-51026397

Quote
SWR» (South Western Railway - about) has not been balancing the books for some time. After two years of strikes by guards in the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) union, that isn't a surprise.

New trains are late, the infrastructure has been unreliable and performance has been falling for years. This railway is not doing well and most of its promises to passengers have not been met.

But here, in black and white for the first time, is an acknowledgment by the new managing director, Mark Hopwood, that the company could fail. Operations could be transferred to a government controlled body.

I don't think it's the most likely outcome. A new deal with revised terms is more likely. But what's clear is that the option of last resort is being actively considered.

A DfT» (Department for Transport - about) spokesperson said: "We monitor the financial health of all our franchises closely and we expect them to meet their contractual obligations.

"The government will shortly bring forward a White Paper containing reforms recommended by the Williams Review that will put passengers first, end the complicated franchising model and simplify fares."

SWR operates routes between London Waterloo, Reading, Bristol, Exeter, Weymouth, and Portsmouth, as well as Island Line on the Isle of Wight.

FirstGroup and MTR were awarded the franchise in August 2017, after outbidding previous operator Stagecoach.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: January 08, 2020, 10:35:39 »

Paul tweeted a copy of a staff email along with the report above

https://twitter.com/PaulCliftonBBC/status/1214585549387907072/photo/1

So it sounds as though SWR» (South Western Railway - about) are after a management contract or are likely to hand the keys back.
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 08, 2020, 12:37:17 »

... and Northern ...and Transpennine Express.

The franchising model, and the great Tory privatisation adventure is completely broken.

Concession models, as used in London, or full renationalisation are the only answers.
The current franchising model with the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) specifying many things - service intervals, seats, and so on and so forth - while still demanding the payments of premiums well into the future is broken.

Nobody tried renewing the first model of franchises - the 'shadow' SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about) and then the SRA started fiddling as soo as they could and since then the franchises have become every more prescriptive. Over a seven to ten year time span the initial assumptions may no longer reflect the actualité - but the DfT seems incapable of adapting.

Why this should be so I leave to the reader!
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 09, 2020, 07:13:05 »

We'll have to see what happens under new management; DfT» (Department for Transport - about) or TOC (Train Operating Company).
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page