Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum
GWR advice (Project Phoenix)
Forum in and beyond Coronavirus
Great Western Coffee Shop
[home] and [about]
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Shortlist out, CRN Awards
11/08/20 - Tuesday Club - ONLINE
12/08/20 - Comm. Rail & Recovery ONLINE
12/08/20 - ConnectedCities, WECA ONLINE
Random Image
Train Running Polls Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
August 09, 2020, 06:55:49 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[244] An image for every day of the month - can you identify the loc...
[60] The Small Bore London tube - a public health hazard?
[34] Grand Opening of the new car park area at Melksham HUB on Fri ...
[33] Trimode cl 769 to operate Reading to Oxford and Gatwick.
[26] Porkway Partway
[20] Local traffic - Bourne End to Marlow
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Future government spending - defence not rail, road and hospital?  (Read 674 times)
Hero Member
Posts: 30178

View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 09, 2020, 04:50:47 am »

From the Daily Mail

STEPHEN GLOVER: Forget new railways... In a post-Brexit world, we simply MUST spend more on defence

A long article ...

... I hope that Mr Johnson will draw his eyes away from splashing out tens of billions of pounds on new railways, roads and hospitals, and dramatically reverse the relentless chipping away at our defence capabilities by successive governments.

I doubt even Labour would oppose such a policy. The patriotic people in the North and Midlands who voted Tory for the first time last month would cheer him on.

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Data Manager
Hero Member
Posts: 955

Hockley viaduct

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2020, 07:06:55 am »

Not another aircraft carrier! Cut in the number of senior staff officers would save a lot, see for a fairly scathing critique.
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 10218

View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2020, 10:43:43 am »

Also, Corbyn would give up nuclear deterrent (and many other offensive equipment) - Labour want to be able to defend our shores but launch no offesive attacks anywhere - so that guy is wrong on stating Labour would support additional spending....
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 4897

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2020, 10:48:18 am »

There was a piece in yesterday's Times saying just the opposite - that all big projects were being reviewed to see what could be cut. Dominic Cummings's previous comments about "disastrous" spending on military projects was mentioned, and those "two aircraft carriers, at a cost of 6.2 billion" in particular.

HS2 was also, and inevitably, on the table, but the reason for saving money was so as to steer more of it to the new electoral targets - such as the NHS, and the "new Tory" areas in the north and Midlands where railways are certainly on their shopping lists.

But this was all based on Dominic-watching, a new skill that the commentariat are still learning.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2020, 07:48:34 pm by stuving » Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 785

View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2020, 07:31:09 pm »

HS2 was also, and inevitably, on the table, but the reason for saving money was so as to steer more of it to the new electoral targets - such as the NHS, and the "new Tory" areas in the north and Midlands where railways are certainly on their shopping lists.

Bearing in mind that the Midlands and North are quite keen on HS2, binning it now might not go down too well in the "new Tory" areas.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page