Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum [home] and [about]
from GWR - Travel with confidence
Forum in and beyond Coronavirus
DfT Covid Travel Advice
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 03/10/20 - RailFuture Annual - ONLINE
05/10/20 - Connected Cities - ONLINE
09/10/20 - Travelwach Southwest
01/11/20 - Ashley Down Survey Closes
Random Image
Train Running Polls Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 01, 2020, 02:01:47 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[147] ScotRail train ruins view of Harry Potter 'Hogwarts Express'
[102] Autumn day out - Kennet and Avon Canal in Bath
[61] Plaque marks place in history for 1880s listed footbridge at W...
[56] Bike spaces on IETs
[53] Returning to holidays and leisure trips - but UK or overseas?
[51] Looking at a return to cycling
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Future government spending - defence not rail, road and hospital?  (Read 718 times)
Hero Member
Posts: 30684

View Profile WWW Email
« on: January 09, 2020, 04:50:47 am »

From the Daily Mail

STEPHEN GLOVER: Forget new railways... In a post-Brexit world, we simply MUST spend more on defence

A long article ...

... I hope that Mr Johnson will draw his eyes away from splashing out tens of billions of pounds on new railways, roads and hospitals, and dramatically reverse the relentless chipping away at our defence capabilities by successive governments.

I doubt even Labour would oppose such a policy. The patriotic people in the North and Midlands who voted Tory for the first time last month would cheer him on.

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Data Manager
Hero Member
Posts: 1006

Hockley viaduct

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 09, 2020, 07:06:55 am »

Not another aircraft carrier! Cut in the number of senior staff officers would save a lot, see for a fairly scathing critique.
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 10226

View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: January 09, 2020, 10:43:43 am »

Also, Corbyn would give up nuclear deterrent (and many other offensive equipment) - Labour want to be able to defend our shores but launch no offesive attacks anywhere - so that guy is wrong on stating Labour would support additional spending....
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 4986

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 09, 2020, 10:48:18 am »

There was a piece in yesterday's Times saying just the opposite - that all big projects were being reviewed to see what could be cut. Dominic Cummings's previous comments about "disastrous" spending on military projects was mentioned, and those "two aircraft carriers, at a cost of £6.2 billion" in particular.

HS2 was also, and inevitably, on the table, but the reason for saving money was so as to steer more of it to the new electoral targets - such as the NHS, and the "new Tory" areas in the north and Midlands where railways are certainly on their shopping lists.

But this was all based on Dominic-watching, a new skill that the commentariat are still learning.
« Last Edit: January 10, 2020, 07:48:34 pm by stuving » Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
Posts: 826

View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: January 10, 2020, 07:31:09 pm »

HS2 was also, and inevitably, on the table, but the reason for saving money was so as to steer more of it to the new electoral targets - such as the NHS, and the "new Tory" areas in the north and Midlands where railways are certainly on their shopping lists.

Bearing in mind that the Midlands and North are quite keen on HS2, binning it now might not go down too well in the "new Tory" areas.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

Pages: [1]
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page