Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:55 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:12:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[72] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[67] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[66] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[59] Return of the BRUTE?
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: What happened to Electrification west of Royal Wootton Bassett?  (Read 3266 times)
Markscottuk
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


View Profile Email
« on: January 11, 2020, 19:44:05 »

With the "north" GWML (Great Western Main Line) line from Bristol Parkway to RWB being electrified as well as the mainline through to Paddington, whats happening with the cabling towards Thingley junction? 

As I understand it, Network Rail has permitted development rights to run the cabling along their land, but I heard that people near Chippenham put a complaint in and stopped the work?

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2020, 19:52:26 »

With the "north" GWML (Great Western Main Line) line from Bristol Parkway to RWB being electrified as well as the mainline through to Paddington, whats happening with the cabling towards Thingley junction? 

As I understand it, Network Rail has permitted development rights to run the cabling along their land, but I heard that people near Chippenham put a complaint in and stopped the work?


Welcome to the forum, Mark; we have a number of experts here who should know the status.   Overhead, it seems rather odd that the electrification ceased around Cocklebury Lane Bridge ... not sure about cables along the line to all the hardware they've installed at Thingley ... with the cable dug in from there to Melksham Electric Substation.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2020, 21:03:41 »

And here's another welcome. This electrification was one of several stretches deferred because Network Rail needed money for other things and DfT» (Department for Transport - about) wouldn't add to their budget for CP5 (Control Period 5 - the five year period between 2014 and 2019) (2014-2019). Or else "deferred", for other devious reasons of DfT's, according to various conspiracy theories.

While most of the supports are in place from the west side of Chippenham to the substation at Thingley, power is fed from there via a Big Wire in a trough (and as Graham says gets to Thingley by an even bigger wire in a trench from Melksham).

In principle it is for NR» (Network Rail - home page) to decide they want to restart work on any of the deferred stretches, but it's not really that simple. Other deferred stretches have higher priority, and the whole budgeting process has been changed for CP6 (Control Period 6 - The five year period between 2019 and 2024) - and that's all before Dominic Cummings, or the Williams review, get started on it.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2020, 22:25:41 »

Aren't there some issues with Chippenham Station?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2020, 23:54:40 »

Aren't there some issues with Chippenham Station?

I can't recall anything specific (but that proves little). However, work was I think stopped with some of the design, and approvals such as for listing buildings, outstanding. In that case we have no way of knowing if there are serious issues still to be dealt with or not.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: January 12, 2020, 05:03:13 »

I didn't know whether or not the cable had been run ... but I am aware of the stated issue at Chippenham Station with raising the listed footbridge to provide the required clearance for the overhead conductor cable while at the same time satisfying the listed building requirements.  The renewal of the ticket office, provision of barriers and shelter building on the north side for barriers and ticket machine was protracted in planning, and caused objections as to how elements had been implemented too

Other posters have commented on the masts erected on the way to Thingley Junction ... I will add comment as to the  impressive-looking substations there (is it really all needed just for that cabled puppy to Cocklebury Lane), the major bridge replacement at the bridge just west of the junction, a long closure of Box tunnel for works, moving of the tracks and widening the platforms away from the canopy at Bath Spa.   I wonder how much money was spent on preparation works through Chippenham and towards Bristol, and the usefulness (or otherwise) of that spend with the project now suspended indefinitely.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JontyMort
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 12, 2020, 09:52:31 »

I didn't know whether or not the cable had been run ... but I am aware of the stated issue at Chippenham Station with raising the listed footbridge to provide the required clearance for the overhead conductor cable while at the same time satisfying the listed building requirements.  The renewal of the ticket office, provision of barriers and shelter building on the north side for barriers and ticket machine was protracted in planning, and caused objections as to how elements had been implemented too

Other posters have commented on the masts erected on the way to Thingley Junction ... I will add comment as to the  impressive-looking substations there (is it really all needed just for that cabled puppy to Cocklebury Lane), the major bridge replacement at the bridge just west of the junction, a long closure of Box tunnel for works, moving of the tracks and widening the platforms away from the canopy at Bath Spa.   I wonder how much money was spent on preparation works through Chippenham and towards Bristol, and the usefulness (or otherwise) of that spend with the project now suspended indefinitely.

Logic suggests that after Bristol East remodelling it ought to make sense to sort out Temple Meads, and the wire Parkway to TM(resolve), after which the Bath route might be viable. Oxford looks more of a priority.

When is the Severn Tunnel being energised?
Logged
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9810



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 12, 2020, 10:10:35 »

Travelled from Oxford to Didcot Parkway this week and was surprised how much work was done along that route before the project was paused.   A lot of uprights, quite a few crosspieces and a shiny new feed point at Radley.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 12, 2020, 15:52:26 »

I didn't know whether or not the cable had been run ... but I am aware of the stated issue at Chippenham Station with raising the listed footbridge to provide the required clearance for the overhead conductor cable while at the same time satisfying the listed building requirements.  The renewal of the ticket office, provision of barriers and shelter building on the north side for barriers and ticket machine was protracted in planning, and caused objections as to how elements had been implemented too

Other posters have commented on the masts erected on the way to Thingley Junction ... I will add comment as to the  impressive-looking substations there (is it really all needed just for that cabled puppy to Cocklebury Lane), the major bridge replacement at the bridge just west of the junction, a long closure of Box tunnel for works, moving of the tracks and widening the platforms away from the canopy at Bath Spa.   I wonder how much money was spent on preparation works through Chippenham and towards Bristol, and the usefulness (or otherwise) of that spend with the project now suspended indefinitely.

Logic suggests that after Bristol East remodelling it ought to make sense to sort out Temple Meads, and the wire Parkway to TM(resolve), after which the Bath route might be viable. Oxford looks more of a priority.

When is the Severn Tunnel being energised?

Think you need to have a little read here because thats where we are generally discussing the GWR (Great Western Railway) Electrification: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=18592.0
Logged
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 461


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: January 12, 2020, 16:11:04 »

Travelled from Oxford to Didcot Parkway this week and was surprised how much work was done along that route before the project was paused.   A lot of uprights, quite a few crosspieces and a shiny new feed point at Radley.
Stopping the electrification to Oxford was very short sighted. The piling is pretty much complete to Kensington Junction and I believe that of the bridges only Culham Farm Bridge and possibly the footbridge at Hinksey need any work. And of course the signalling is also electrification ready.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: January 12, 2020, 18:01:40 »

Travelled from Oxford to Didcot Parkway this week and was surprised how much work was done along that route before the project was paused.   A lot of uprights, quite a few crosspieces and a shiny new feed point at Radley.
Stopping the electrification to Oxford was very short sighted. The piling is pretty much complete to Kensington Junction and I believe that of the bridges only Culham Farm Bridge and possibly the footbridge at Hinksey need any work. And of course the signalling is also electrification ready.

I believe the Oxford reason is the same as Bristol, as both track layouts were scheduled to be remodelled post resignalling but prior to electrification.  But of course that was the NR» (Network Rail - home page) CP5 (Control Period 5 - the five year period between 2014 and 2019) Plan........ Roll Eyes
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page