Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:15 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
Additional 18:25 Shalford to Reading
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
18:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:25 Shalford to Reading
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 19:16:47 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
  Print  
Author Topic: Bristol Airport  (Read 15614 times)
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: February 15, 2020, 22:02:49 »


Airbus have breathed new life into the A330 with the "neo" (new engine option), which is basically a re-engined, more fuel-efficient evolution. It's been quite successful. It doesn't have the legs of the A350, but perfectly good for flights up to about 10 hours, which is why Virgin (for example) have ordered both - the A330 neo's to replace their current A330 "ceo's" (current engine option).


The A330 also forms the basis of the Voyager* aircraft, used by the RAF (Royal Air Force) for a variety of roles, including troop and VIP transport, refuelling, and mobile hospital. I was lucky enough to get a ride on one. The view from the window is more interesting than on most flights.







(*The aircraft are comfortable, fast, and do not smell of badly serviced toilet. They should not be confused with the train of the same name.)
Logged

Now, please!
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: June 10, 2021, 14:52:01 »

Bristol Airport is a business. Those Canadian teachers are no fools. They invested in a reasonably good airport and have spent a lot of money on getting more out of their investment. They are very proud of that in Ontario, my friend, a retired principal who follows events closely, tells me.
By chance, I've heard that the Ontario Teachers Pension Fund have just bought a big agribusiness conglomerate in the Goulburn [?sp] Valley of Australia. They own a lot of things in a lot of places and I don't think they're just for teachers nowadays!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 26, 2021, 16:51:06 »

This report states that the only realistic way to reduce carbon dioxide from aviation is to fly less.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-59045851

No amount of tinkering at the edges by slightly more efficient air aircraft, or adding a little veg oil to the fuel will significantly reduce emissions.

Neither will counting on future developments reduce emissions in the here and now.

If flying is to be reduced, then we dont need more airport capacity at Bristol, Heathrow, or anywhere else.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: October 26, 2021, 23:22:51 »


If flying is to be reduced, then we dont need more airport capacity at Bristol, Heathrow, or anywhere else.

It isn't going to be reduced. More people want to fly for business or leisure than are prepared to sellotape themselves to an aircraft, and get banged up for doing so. They just don't make as much noise. The argument against Bristol Airport should not be confused with the argument against flying per se, and won't be by the inspector. His remit is planning law and government policy, and if he thinks the airport has a good case against those yardsticks, he will find in their favour. That won't necessarily be the end of the matter, but he might think the argument of cutting emissions to travel to get on the plane pans out in real maths.

You may think adding a little veg oil is tinkering, but once the Ontario Teachers Pension and World Domination Fund starts producing entirely green aviation fuel from genetically modified crops grown on its Australian farms, there will be no argument against flying. Not that that will stop some people. Aviation has come a very long way in little over a century, and there is no reason to think the journey is finished. The picture in the report is, I think, taken from inside a Boeing 787. Competition between them and Airbus is reducing fuel consumption per passenger mile, and will continue to do so.

You will remember the days when we could buy indulgences by paying for a tree to be planted in memory of our week's self catering in Benidorm. Then we found out that the Scottish government was chopping them down to build wind farms, and Drax was importing even more to burn in its inferno. It never did more than make the few people who fell for the hype feel a little better. Expanding Bristol airport's operations might do some actual good if it stops travel to other airports to catch flights. And if flying does fall and they are stuck with an empty shiny new terminal, then we can say that there never was a need for it, and Ontario pensioners can take the hit.

(I know two retired teachers in Ontario. Retired teachers here would envy them.)
« Last Edit: October 26, 2021, 23:31:35 by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: October 27, 2021, 07:36:19 »

You may think adding a little veg oil is tinkering, but once the Ontario Teachers Pension and World Domination Fund starts producing entirely green aviation fuel from genetically modified crops grown on its Australian farms, there will be no argument against flying.

So we use agricultural land to allow people to fly rather than feeding people.  Not a good look if as predicted the known amount of climate change causes food shortages in some parts of the world. 
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #35 on: October 27, 2021, 12:03:55 »



Those green aeroplanes have a long way to go...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #36 on: October 27, 2021, 12:49:22 »

I very much doubt that vegetable derived oil will permit of green flying.

Firstly it needs to be produced without significant fossil fuel input. No diesel tractors used in cultivation, no natural gas derived fertilser used on the crop, no gas or coal used in the works that process the fuel.

And secondly, even if such fuel does become available, it should be used FIRSTLY for essential purposes such as emergency services vehicles, food production and transport, shipping, and existing public transport.

Only after such high priority applications have been greened  should passenger flights be considered.

Meanwhile in the here and now, the only way to reduce carbon dioxide from flying is to reduce flying. Tax aviation to the same extent as road fuel. Prohibit any advertising or promotion of air travel. End all grants and subsidies to airlines, airports and related enterprises.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: October 27, 2021, 13:26:02 »



Those green aeroplanes have a long way to go...

Agreed.
Not only do trains come out best, but reducing the carbon emissions of trains is relatively simple. Electrification is a mature technology and available right now. No need for hugely expensive research into things not yet invented, simply get on and electrify major rail routes with existing and readily available technology. Use battery power as a second choice when OHLE is not suitable.
A greater proportion of electricity, whether for railway traction current or for more general uses, should be produced renewably. This also needs no expensive research. Simply get on and do it. Wind turbines and solar energy are mature technologies and available right now.

No sensible person expects large long haul electric passenger aircraft, it simply cant be done with available or reasonably foreseable technology.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: October 27, 2021, 13:33:29 »


So we use agricultural land to allow people to fly rather than feeding people.  Not a good look if as predicted the known amount of climate change causes food shortages in some parts of the world. 

It makes as much sense as the many fields around Devon growing maize to throw into anaerobic digesters to generate subsidies green electricity while we continue to import food that can be grow at home. Thankfully, being Canadian, they will probably repurpose an old coal mine or open cast iron pit, rather than use existing agricultural land. It is also possible that I let my imagination get the better of me, again.

In other news, Chancellor Rishi Sunak has just announce a cut in the aviation passenger duty levied on internal flights, and an extension of state help for regional airports.



Those green aeroplanes have a long way to go...

Should soon pass private cars, I reckon. May even gave done so already, given the introduction of newer engines since 2018.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2021, 13:39:37 by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #39 on: October 27, 2021, 13:37:05 »

In other news, Chancellor Rishi Sunak has just announce a cut in the aviation passenger duty levied on internal flights, and an extension of state help for regional airports.

How is that green, or is he about to announce an even greater cut in train fares ... driving private to public (air) to public (rail)?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: October 27, 2021, 13:46:21 »

Should soon pass private cars, I reckon. May even gave done so already, given the introduction of newer engines since 2018.

Doesn't seem likely, given the rate of growth of electric car sales.

IEA, Global electric car stock, 2010-2019, IEA, Paris https://www.iea.org/data-and-statistics/charts/global-electric-car-stock-2010-2019
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: October 27, 2021, 13:51:00 »

In other news, Chancellor Rishi Sunak has just announce a cut in the aviation passenger duty levied on internal flights, and an extension of state help for regional airports.

How is that green, or is he about to announce an even greater cut in train fares ... driving private to public (air) to public (rail)?

I don't think he said it was green, but if burning American wood pellets is green, it probably is green. I'm sure the explanation will be with us soon. It isn't with immediate effect anyway, so if you were thinking of flying to Glasgow to lobby the COP26 people, you will still have to pay the full current rate.
Logged

Now, please!
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #42 on: October 27, 2021, 14:30:10 »

In other news, Chancellor Rishi Sunak has just announce a cut in the aviation passenger duty levied on internal flights, and an extension of state help for regional airports.

How is that green, or is he about to announce an even greater cut in train fares ... driving private to public (air) to public (rail)?

So much for greening the economy.

Subsidies for regional airports, will encourage more use thereof and increase carbon emissions.
Cut in air passenger duty, to reduce airline fares and encourage more flying.

Meanwhile petrol is at about the same cash price as it was ten years ago, and therefore much cheaper if compared to inflation or wages.

Train fares increase every year. It almost looks like a long term policy to encourage driving and flying and to discourage rail travel.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: October 27, 2021, 15:16:04 »

So much for greening the economy.


Be fair, broadgage. The spin doctors haven't had a go at this yet. They're not so green as they're cabbage looking.*

(* I don't understand it either. I'm from Lancashire.)
Logged

Now, please!
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #44 on: October 27, 2021, 16:38:19 »

I think that "cabbage looking" is an old and potentially insulting term for a person with severe mental or physical  disability. As in "just sits or lies there like a cabbage" not capable of much thought or movement.

A London gangster saying was "to cabbage someone" meaning a beating or assault that was not fatal, but that caused serious disability.
« Last Edit: October 27, 2021, 17:05:27 by Red Squirrel » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page