Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 18 Apr 2024
- Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (1966)
Melksham Station closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
20:16 Frome to Westbury
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:09 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:28 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
18:57 London Paddington to Great Malvern
19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
20:30 Carmarthen to Bristol Parkway
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
Delayed
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 20:33:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[163] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[97] Signage - not making it easy ...
[20] IETs at Melksham
[18] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[17] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[16] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: How you'd reopen a railway to Witney  (Read 12119 times)
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« on: March 07, 2020, 18:42:29 »

It looks like the old Oxford-Witney railway is going to be an election issue here in West Oxfordshire - the Lib Dems are making it one of their major campaign topics. So I thought I'd have a look at how feasible reopening something broadly along the old alignment would be.

It starts off pretty simple at Yarnton. The trackbed is still there and unobstructed, passing through the Cassington Quarry site. There's even an underbridge beneath the A40 that could be reused (it would mean a longer journey for quarry traffic, turning at either Peartree or Eynsham roundabout, but that's not a big deal). Map:



Eynsham is more difficult, because the B4449 (southern bypass) was built on the trackbed. There's room to the north of it, as long as you steer clear of Eynsham Abbey, which is a Scheduled Ancient Monument.

Obviously level crossings are pretty much verboten these days, so you'd need to bridge the railway. This would mean splitting the roundabout by the Siemens works into two, one north of the bridge, one south, each at sufficient distance from the bridge to ensure sightlines.

You then encounter Station Road. I think it'd be simplest just to stop this up on either side, with a pedestrian/cycle bridge as part of the station. Put the car parking on the south side to minimise the impact of traffic on Eynsham residents.



We're then out into open countryside again with no obstructions. South Leigh originally had a level crossing, which wouldn't fly these days. So realign the route to the south, with just one bridge needed, and minimal impact on properties.

At Tar Lane (the minor road from the Cogges part of Witney to Stanton Harcourt), again, you could just stop it up - there isn't enough through traffic to merit a full bridge. Perhaps put a pedestrian and cycle bridge in to make a very enjoyable, largely traffic-free greenway.



And then there's Witney. The old line into the town has been built on, and the A40 embankment obstructs it. So just stay south of the A40, I think. Put a Park & Ride-type station at Ducklington, right by the A40 junction. It's around 1300m walk/cycle to Church Green, obviously less to estates such as Thorney Leys.



I haven't looked at reinstating the old route on to Carterton because it'd be pointless - the original route didn't actually go to Carterton, but ran south of Brize Norton village, and the air base has since extended over it. So you'd want a new alignment if you were to continue to Carterton, probably going south of Curbridge and then north of Brize.

Likely to happen? I doubt it, sadly. But it would be a much more sustainable answer to West Oxfordshire's traffic problems than dualling the A40 could ever be.
Logged
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 07, 2020, 19:36:34 »

I don't think there is an easier closed and lifted trackbed branch to reinstate, certainly in this part of the country. If I recall correctly, West Oxfordshire Council went against rebuilding the railway through fear of outsiders spoiling there delightful world.
Even if it was a local train to Oxford or Didcot (Cowley in the future?) I could see this being a very popular railway. Could even be somewhere for those fast Oxford terminators from London to go. I despair at how slow attitudes to public transport change but these are changing times, and anything seems possible with climate at the top of the agenda.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 07, 2020, 21:10:09 »

Wasn't there a suggestion of a completely new alignment from Handborough?
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: March 08, 2020, 19:12:45 »

There was, but it seems like a non-starter to me. Hanborough-Witney has a significant hill whereas Yarnton-Eynsham-Witney is flat following the Thames and Windrush valleys. You'd also be missing out Eynsham and terminating further from the centre of Witney.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1535



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 05, 2021, 13:51:48 »

There's apparently another campaign underway to do this- see

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-oxfordshire-56240180

Interesting to see that Carterton (which has seen a lot of development in recent decades to become quite a substantial dormitory settlement) is included in the proposal
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 909


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: March 06, 2021, 08:41:52 »

I don't know what Witney's population is these days, but it must be one of the largest towns in England without a station.

Just out of interest, following on from Richard's comment, how verboten is a new level crossing? Obviously a much easier and cheaper option in many circumstances than a bridge. Would it be completely ruled out, or could a well designed one with good sightlines still be acceptable in some circumstances, especially on lines where the maximum speed was relatively low?
Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: March 06, 2021, 10:58:09 »

Population 27,522 in the 2011 census, so much the same as many other towns without a station such as Calne and Corsham
Logged
onthecushions
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 977


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 07, 2021, 21:56:35 »


Would it need 8 car 387's or tram trains?

That might swing viability.

OTC
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2021, 20:40:03 »

The Witney-Oxford Transport group are doing their best to make this into an election issue.

They've done a survey of all the district and county council candidates in West Oxfordshire. Of those who replied (the great majority), all but two were in favour of preserving the line against further development.

The two: Ian Hudspeth, current council leader and county councillor for Woodstock; and Liam Walker, former cabinet member for transport (until being booted out for ill-advised comments about cyclists) and county councillor for neighbouring Hanborough. Both are strongly associated with the project to make Hanborough into the parkway for the A40 corridor.

It's going to be an interesting election...
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #9 on: May 18, 2021, 14:08:11 »

The new Oxfordshire County Council cabinet member for transport strategy/development is a Witney councillor (Duncan Enright, Labour) who's spoken in support of bringing the railway back, while their LibDem coalition (senior) partners campaigned strongly for it. Ian Hudspeth, referred above, lost his seat. This could be the best chance the railway's had for a long time.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 18, 2021, 20:34:13 »

The new Oxfordshire County Council cabinet member for transport strategy/development is a Witney councillor (Duncan Enright, Labour) who's spoken in support of bringing the railway back, while their LibDem coalition (senior) partners campaigned strongly for it. Ian Hudspeth, referred above, lost his seat. This could be the best chance the railway's had for a long time.

You would have thought having your constituency MP (Member of Parliament) in number 10 for 6 years would have provided some added oomph to any campaign, but it didn't. I'll be up that way tomorrow, and will look out for signs of opinion forming. It would certainly benefit the whole area, not just Witney (and Carterton, with either a rail extension or more likely Park and Ride). I have had to drive into Oxford during the back end of morning rush hour more than once, and it isn't pretty.
« Last Edit: May 18, 2021, 20:54:04 by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #11 on: May 20, 2021, 12:27:09 »

Right on cue:

https://www.oxfordmail.co.uk/news/19315113.review-a40-dualling-social-care-reform-planned-new-oxfordshire-coalition/

Quote
It is unclear yet how the new administration’s agenda will play out, but the council's new leader has said plans to dual the A40 between Oxford and Witney will be reviewed, with the aim of adding in a train line alongside it.

Liz Leffman, the new Lib Dem leader of the council, said: “We need to look at what the positives of the project the previous administration put together are. One of the things we would like to see is if it is possible to incorporate a train line between Witney and Oxford into the plans; not to build it, but to make it possible in the future.”
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 27, 2021, 11:01:22 »

I was in Witney the other day, then had to drive from Carterton to Oxford and back. Much road building work is in progress as the A40 reaches Oxford, so if the new administration wants to save a rail route, they had better get on the case sharpish. To be honest, the idea does look a little unlikely, but the amount of building going on in the area would make a rail link a very desirable thing to have.
Logged

Now, please!
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #13 on: May 27, 2021, 11:31:38 »

The A40 works at the Oxford end wouldn't affect a railway, fortunately - they're basically works associated with the Oxford North housing/office development. It's the Witney–Duke's Cut A40 programme that has more consequence, and that's what the new administration is looking at reworking, I think.
Logged
Richard Fairhurst
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1209


View Profile Email
« Reply #14 on: January 28, 2023, 12:49:38 »

Reported that a firm of consultants employed by Oxfordshire County Council is working on a business case for reopening Oxford–Witney:

https://twitter.com/OxfordClarion/status/1618958285104898049
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page