Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 13:31:57 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 72
  Print  
Author Topic: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion  (Read 384737 times)
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #585 on: November 01, 2018, 17:08:58 »

The author cheerfully admits '£40m is a back of the envelope calculation!'. He suggests infilling the rails and running buses through Portishead as now, along a bus only lane of the Portbury hundred, and then joining the STRAILed rail at Portbury dock as far as Cumberland basin and then join the Metro bus route M2 to the 'real' Temple Meads, Cabot Circus, BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains), University , Jacob Wells Road, and back to the centre. One snag that I can foresee is how to get off the strailed rail and on to the non guided busway bit of the M2 as it cant go over Ashton Avenue Swing bridge.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2018, 17:16:13 by chuffed » Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #586 on: November 01, 2018, 17:30:00 »

The author cheerfully admits '£40m is a back of the envelope calculation!'. He suggests infilling the rails and running buses through Portishead as now, along a bus only lane of the Portbury hundred, and then joining the STRAILed rail at Portbury dock as far as Cumberland basin and then join the Metro bus route M2 to the 'real' Temple Meads, Cabot Circus, BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains), University , Jacob Wells Road, and back to the centre. One snag that I can foresee is how to get off the strailed rail and on to the non guided busway bit of the M2 as it cant go over Ashton Avenue Swing bridge.

Aha! I was going to ask if the idea was to run buses over the rail route - and why. The roads may be congested, but £40M ought to buy a few bits of bus lane and bus-only access road, without the hazard of meeting a goods train.

STRAIL are a German company, though that name (they prefer capitals) appears in their product names. If you go your local level crossing, the chances are you'll see some of their road panels between and beside the rails. I think their big advantage is that you can just lift them to get access to the track and then as quickly put them back, without any pneumatic drill or tar boiler.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #587 on: November 01, 2018, 17:51:55 »

The author cheerfully admits '£40m is a back of the envelope calculation!'. He suggests infilling the rails and running buses through Portishead as now, along a bus only lane of the Portbury hundred, and then joining the STRAILed rail at Portbury dock as far as Cumberland basin and then join the Metro bus route M2 to the 'real' Temple Meads, Cabot Circus, BRI» (Bristol Temple Meads - next trains), University , Jacob Wells Road, and back to the centre. One snag that I can foresee is how to get off the strailed rail and on to the non guided busway bit of the M2 as it cant go over Ashton Avenue Swing bridge.

Aha! I was going to ask if the idea was to run buses over the rail route - and why. The roads may be congested, but £40M ought to buy a few bits of bus lane and bus-only access road, without the hazard of meeting a goods train.

Portbury Docks to Cumberland Basin is quite a long stretch of freight track for MetroBus to share...

Interesting how, in less than a month, the debate over Portishead options has seemingly downgraded from Heavy Rail, through Light Rail to Trojan Bus though, isn't it?
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #588 on: November 01, 2018, 19:27:43 »

An article has popped up in the latest edition of the Portishead and Portbury paper suggesting that the way forwards could be STRAIL. It is a system of new and recycled thick rubber panels laid within and beside existing rail tracks and has been used in 30,000 locations in 5 continents to allow road traffic to drive over railways. It does not stop the tracks being used by trains.
I wonder if the Dft and NR» (Network Rail - home page) have considered this...the author claims it will reduce the cost to about 40 million, down  from the 175 million that has been bandied about elsewhere.

Can you give more details of this 'Portishead and Portbury paper'? The neaest thing I could find online was this article form a couple of weeks ago, which suggests that the local councillors think tram or tramtrain solutions aren't good enough for their town, so I can't see them promoting a bus on a rubber mat.

STRAIL appears to be a quick and easy way to do level crossings, not a means of building busways... is there more to this idea?

Without further information, this sounds like the kind of idea that just about makes the readers letters page in the Bristol Post on a quiet news day... or the kind of thing Marvin Rees would come up with...
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #589 on: November 02, 2018, 11:14:09 »

And how would this STRAIL idea help run trains?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #590 on: November 02, 2018, 11:24:52 »

And how would this STRAIL idea help run trains?

In this particular case, it appears that the idea would be to lay STRAIL on the freight-only Heavy Rail section between Portbury Docks and Cumberland Basin, thus theoretically allowing a MetroBus extension to Portishead co-exist with the freight trains. The author appears to envisage his huge "back of the envelope" reduction down to £40 millon would be achieved by running MetroBus rather than Heavy Rail services to Portishead.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #591 on: November 02, 2018, 12:07:53 »

Perhaps if the author was familiar with Metrobust's overspending history those estimates would see a steep rise.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #592 on: November 02, 2018, 13:04:47 »

And how would this STRAIL idea help run trains?

In this particular case, it appears that the idea would be to lay STRAIL on the freight-only Heavy Rail section between Portbury Docks and Cumberland Basin, thus theoretically allowing a MetroBus extension to Portishead co-exist with the freight trains. The author appears to envisage his huge "back of the envelope" reduction down to £40 millon would be achieved by running MetroBus rather than Heavy Rail services to Portishead.
I see. It sounds hazardous at best.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #593 on: November 02, 2018, 13:25:13 »

The Portishead Branch was only ever single track IIRC (if I recall/remember/read correctly). Two track is only just wide enough for a busway, so there would need to be passing places for busses to pass. Would you then need a complex set of traffic lights - you could call it a signalling system. The widening necessary for the passing places (you could call them loops), together with the signalling would push the costs would go up dramatically to something like the same as Portishead reopening project. 

This STAIL idea seems to be not very well thought out!
Logged
mjones
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 408


View Profile
« Reply #594 on: November 02, 2018, 13:31:33 »

This idea has been kicking round for several years now. There was demonstration event a few years ago, when it was being promoted as 'rubber road' if I remember correctly. I'll look it up later. I'd have more confidence if there was a working scheme on an abandoned track before anyone suggests a shared scheme...
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #595 on: November 02, 2018, 13:49:14 »

mjones - Are you thinking of the mid-2000s HoldFast proposal for allowing cars and trains to share the Newton Abbot-Paignton line?

That method was also marketed as being able to facilitate guided bus.

EDIT - I had to use the Wayback Machine to find it, but here is the original HoldFast website.
« Last Edit: November 02, 2018, 14:13:08 by Lee » Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #596 on: November 02, 2018, 17:31:55 »

Holdfast kit appears on this road on rail temporary job in Scotland, about 150m long.
https://www.networkrail.co.uk/feeds/new-system-signals-changes-for-stromeferry-motorists/
It was also done a few years ago:
http://www.levelcrossinginstallations.co.uk/stromeferry-scotland/

Paul
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #597 on: November 02, 2018, 17:53:34 »

Holdfast kit appears on this road on rail temporary job in Scotland, about 150m long.
https://www.networkrail.co.uk/feeds/new-system-signals-changes-for-stromeferry-motorists/
It was also done a few years ago:
http://www.levelcrossinginstallations.co.uk/stromeferry-scotland/

Paul


150 metres on a temporary basis - rather different to the whole line from Cumberland Basin to Portbury on a permanent basis! Even with 150 metres the motorists complained about having to wait for trains!
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #598 on: November 02, 2018, 18:55:38 »

Quite. I'm not sure why we're dignifying this idea by discussing it!
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #599 on: November 02, 2018, 19:39:53 »

Look at it this way - Instead of being criticised for dismissing it out of hand without proper consideration, we can rest safe in the knowledge that we dismissed it out of hand after thoroughly researching and debating it!
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 38 39 [40] 41 42 ... 72
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page