grahame
|
|
« Reply #930 on: January 30, 2022, 11:29:07 » |
|
I have posted some general thoughts on most appropriate (most useful) discussion and campaigning at http://www.passenger.chat/25953sanityneeded which included a hefty chunk on Portishead. I am not crossposting the whole thing here, but to take a look, and by all means quote here. Let's leave all the options in the archive (they already are), get on with it. By all means promoting development and how we can usefully help here, and providing inputs to help progress and tune the project.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6537
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #932 on: February 03, 2022, 19:55:57 » |
|
Hopefully a step forward. It doesn't raise huge issues, and if the redacted part says "Barry Cash", it is looking for a response rather than a detailed rebuttal.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
Posts: 5364
There are some who call me... Tim
|
|
« Reply #933 on: February 14, 2022, 10:03:27 » |
|
BBC» 's Politics West did a piece on Portishead this Sunday: https://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/m0014jkw/politics-west-13022022There was some FoSBR» (or was it FoBSR?) involvement... Scroll forward to 20:30
|
|
|
Logged
|
Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
|
|
|
Western Pathfinder
|
|
« Reply #934 on: February 14, 2022, 10:42:21 » |
|
I hope your children approve this time Tim.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6537
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #935 on: February 14, 2022, 15:00:40 » |
|
Sorry - did that chap at the end say £650 million for road schemes? I may have identified the issue here.
Very well put, Tim. It's nice to hear positives rather than just moans.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
Posts: 6537
The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!
|
|
« Reply #936 on: February 15, 2022, 17:30:17 » |
|
Cancellations to services between London Paddington and Reading Due to a road vehicle blocking the railway between London Paddington and Reading the London Paddington bound local stopping line is closed.
Not Barry Cash trying to prove a point, I hope? (Seems to have ended without injury, before you ask)
|
|
|
Logged
|
Now, please!
|
|
|
|
johnneyw
|
|
« Reply #938 on: April 19, 2022, 11:48:50 » |
|
Nowt on the DfT website so far today that I can find.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #939 on: April 19, 2022, 11:49:22 » |
|
https://travelwest.info/projects/portishead-rail-line-metrowest-phase-1 ... Deadline for the DCO▸ decision extended until 19 April 2022
On October 20th 2021, a Written Ministerial Statement was presented in the House of Commons stating that the deadline for the DCO decision is to be extended to 19 April 2022 (an extension of 6 months) to allow further consideration of environmental matters. And here we are ... listening ...
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
chuffed
|
|
« Reply #940 on: April 19, 2022, 15:53:26 » |
|
And ever more twiddling of thumbs....just had a email from Dft to say the decision has been delayed YET AGAIN to 19th February 2023 to give North Somerset more time to secure all the funding. Absolutely ridiculous !!
I have been asked by my right honourable friend, the Secretary of State to make this written ministerial statement. This statement concerns the application made by North Somerset District Council under the Planning Act 2008 for the construction of a new railway on the trackbed on the former branch line from Bristol to Portishead.
Under section 107(1) of the Planning Act 2008, the Secretary of State must make his decision within 3 months of receipt of the examining authority’s report unless exercising the power under section 107(3) to extend the deadline and make a statement to the House of Parliament announcing the new deadline.
The Secretary of State received the examining authority’s report on the Portishead Branch Line – MetroWest Phase 1 development consent order application on 19 July 2021 and, following an earlier extension of 4 months to allow further consideration of environmental matters, the current deadline for a decision is 19 April 2022.
The deadline for the decision is now to be extended to 19 February 2023 (an extension of 7 months) to allow North Somerset District Council further time to demonstrate that funding for the entire scheme has been secured.
The decision to set the new deadline is without prejudice to the decision on whether to grant or refuse development consent for the above application.
Published 19 April 2022
|
|
« Last Edit: April 19, 2022, 16:00:15 by chuffed »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #941 on: April 19, 2022, 16:21:51 » |
|
The deadline for the decision is now to be extended to 19 February 2023 (an extension of 7 months) to allow North Somerset District Council further time to demonstrate that funding for the entire scheme has been secured.
I make that ten months not seven - or has Autumn been cancelled this year?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
|
|
|
johnneyw
|
|
« Reply #942 on: April 19, 2022, 16:27:56 » |
|
So that's how they do it. Off course the previous funding won't cover everything with the recent surge in costs....even less so in 7 months. Goodbye Portishead line and the DfT» , with much hand wringing, will then insist that it's not their fault.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
IndustryInsider
|
|
« Reply #943 on: April 19, 2022, 16:50:40 » |
|
It’s looking less and less likely it’ll happen at all now.
|
|
|
Logged
|
To view my GWML▸ Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
|
|
|
chuffed
|
|
« Reply #944 on: April 19, 2022, 17:59:56 » |
|
I am informed by a reliable committee member of the Portishead Railway group that there is a 34 page letter somewhere justifying this decision to kick the can down the road yet again. It would be helpful if someone could track that down and post it here.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|