Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:50:48 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 72
  Print  
Author Topic: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion  (Read 384443 times)
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #195 on: January 21, 2013, 22:17:49 »

Beaten to it.

I was in the process of replying along the lines that I was fairly sure CfN would respond in the style of Francis Urquhart.

And so it came to pass!
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #196 on: January 21, 2013, 22:27:22 »


"You may very well think that: I couldn't possibly comment."  (Francis UrquhartWink Cheesy Grin
Grin
Logged

Now, please!
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #197 on: February 01, 2013, 16:41:46 »

From the North Somerset Times


Train link excitement mounts

Tracey Fowler, Reporter Thursday, January 31, 2013
9:00 AM

STEAM engines and a brass band will accompany the first passenger trains to run out of Portishead for 53 years.

..
These are just some of the plans already under way in anticipation of trains operating on the re-opened Portishead to Bristol line in April 2017 - 150 years after the station first opened.

Following a meeting in December between North Somerset MP (Member of Parliament) Dr Liam Fox, members of the Portishead Railway Group and transport minister Simon Burns, Dr Fox said he felt more ^upbeat than at any previous time^ about the prospect of seeing trains running to and from Portishead.

He said: ^The information the minister gave us left us all feeling very optimistic and I expect we will get a definitive announcement on dates and funding in parliament before the summer recess.^

A report is expected to be issued by North Somerset Council within days, asking the council^s executive to agree to spending money on the development of the line, which is included in phase one of the proposed Bristol Metro rail project.

Work clearing the Portishead track could begin within weeks, ahead of the nesting season, to allow further surveys to take place on the line.

Bristol^s mayor George Ferguson has recommended the city council approves its share of the funding for the first phase and the other two authorities that make up the West of England Partnership, an organisation formed to respond to joint opportunities and challenges including transport, are expected to follow.



If this happens, re-opening the line will be one of the projects put forward to Government ministers during the spring. If successful, it would receive Government backing before the autumn.

Portishead Railway group confirmed this is exciting news.

Vice chairman Colin Howells said: ^After more than 12 years of campaigning, Portishead Railway Group now believes the re-opening of the Portishead to Bristol railway line is in sight.

^It appears decisions are being made both nationally and locally which, when progressed, should see trains running on the line by 2017. This would coincide with the 150th anniversary of trains first running on the track.^

Passenger services out of Portishead began on April 18, 1867.

To keep up to date with the progress of the Portishead railway campaign visit www.portisheadrailwaygroup.org
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #198 on: February 06, 2013, 22:38:26 »

Exciting indeed! In another place, I said that clearance of vegetation would be a solid sign of progress. If it isn't done by the end of March, though, then it cannot be done until October. Network Rail, or their agents, will want first of all to look at te old rail, some of it more than a century old, to see if it is sufficiently robust to allow use of it by construction trains. If it is, that would be a huge plus as a single train of empty wagons could accomplish as much by way of clearance as a fleet of lorries. According to the Halcrow report which forms the GRIP3 report for the project, drainage will be assessed, and full engineering drawings can be made after clearance.

There is a fair bit of vegetation down there, as the pictures I took some months back show:


at the bridge near Portbury Wharf, and:


looking back towards Sheepway. A good day's work for a good man with a strimmer!
Logged

Now, please!
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #199 on: March 09, 2013, 18:26:12 »

Clearing the vegetation has started at the Quays Avenue end of the line this week, as highlighted in the North Somerset Times.

North Somerset have produced a very clear consultation document regarding the site of the new station. You can access it here 

http://www.nsomerset.gov.uk/Environment/Planning+policy/Local+Development+Framework/Sites+and+Policies+Development+Plan+Document.htm.

 and I urge anyone with an interest to have their say. With NR» (Network Rail - home page) very reluctant to build new level crossings a road over rail bridge is being considered at Quays Avenue, along with alternatives sites where the vegetation is being cleared or further on down the line making it more of a Portishead Parkway.

In my opinion the Waitrose site would still be the best option if there was a level crossing but I think the road over rail bridge would be a real blot on the landscape especially for the residents of Haven View who would probably be looking at the equivalent of the infamous Temple Meads flyover right outside their lounge windows...not to mention all the expense and disruption caused to everyone else, by taking a sledgehammer to crack a nut. I think NR should be persuaded to back down on their no new level crossings ruling, failing which Option 2 is by far the best option compared to the Parkway idea.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #200 on: March 09, 2013, 18:31:15 »

Link does not work
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #201 on: March 09, 2013, 18:33:44 »

Such a long link....the end got missed off !

Try this ..

http://www.n-somerset.gov.uk/Environment/Planning+policy/Local+Development+Framework/Sites+and+Policies+Development+Plan+Document.htm.
Logged
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #202 on: March 09, 2013, 18:58:51 »

Thanks, Chuffed, you have made some good points.  I'll contribute after studying the options, especially if I think I have discovered something special.  Meantime, do you not think that the old Modernisation '60s garage (then, 'new station') site was the only one where you could reasonably expect people from the old part of Portishead to walk or cycle to?  Even the Waitrose site always looked like a P and R to me.

Just as an initial thought, if the town had a frequent local shuttle bus to connect with the train, would it matter where the station site was?
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #203 on: March 09, 2013, 19:03:29 »

Thank you for that, hope the link works now.

I too had thought of your last comment....but how many times have we seen buses laid on to new stations only to be wthdrawn as soon as the numbers begin to drop ...think Ebbw Vale/ Rogerstone.. and then reinstated and dropped again .... Huh Huh
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #204 on: March 09, 2013, 19:08:27 »

The existing Waitrose/ Lidl car park was full to overflowing this morning thanks to a combination of Sat shoppers and free coffee at Waitrose, the once a month Farmers Market, and the 20 deep queues in the library for the new X2 and X3 bus timetables...which incidentally have the route map printly wrongly...Just where any new station parking is meant to fit in with that lot is anyone's guess !!
Logged
trainer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1035


View Profile
« Reply #205 on: March 09, 2013, 19:09:43 »

At the risk of suffering the ire of chuffed, I note that it is not NR» (Network Rail - home page) that has a rule about level crossings, but is a new Standard set by Her Majesty's (mispelt in the official document) Inspectorate of Railways.  I'm sure they are not without influence, but it means that no amount of campaigning will bring about a level crossing.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #206 on: March 09, 2013, 19:22:27 »

In my opinion the Waitrose site would still be the best option if there was a level crossing but I think the road over rail bridge would be a real blot on the landscape especially for the residents of Haven View who would probably be looking at the equivalent of the infamous Temple Meads flyover right outside their lounge windows...

I see your point. I presume the blue hatching on the map is showing Quay Ave realigned slightly to the west to reduce the impact.  I agree the Waitrose site would be the best.
Logged
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #207 on: March 09, 2013, 19:38:03 »

At the risk of suffering the ire of chuffed, I note that it is not NR» (Network Rail - home page) that has a rule about level crossings, but is a new Standard set by Her Majesty's (mispelt in the official document) Inspectorate of Railways.  I'm sure they are not without influence, but it means that no amount of campaigning will bring about a level crossing.
A good example of how the UK (United Kingdom) authorities gold plate safety (and other) requirements and then politicians complain that our railway costs more to build and maintain than the rest of Europe. Given the proximity of the road crossing to the terminus, trains could cross at a very low speed thus reducing risk to virtually nil. A sensible risk assessment would conclude that a crossing was the optimum balance of cost versus risk, but unfortunately we don't do things like that here.
Logged
swrural
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 647


View Profile
« Reply #208 on: March 09, 2013, 19:55:23 »

The existing Waitrose/ Lidl car park was full to overflowing this morning thanks to a combination of Sat shoppers and free coffee at Waitrose, the once a month Farmers Market, and the 20 deep queues in the library for the new X2 and X3 bus timetables...which incidentally have the route map printly wrongly...Just where any new station parking is meant to fit in with that lot is anyone's guess !!

So a multi-storey car park is required there for the, er, less voluntarily ambulant residents?
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #209 on: March 09, 2013, 20:37:06 »

This is good news. Work had to start this month, or we would be into the nesting season, and would have to wait until October. I saw in WEP's programme that there would be a "refresh" of the GRIP3 report. Why, I don't know, unless it is to take account of the drainage works in the Pill - Ham Green tunnel and the awful spectre of the Bust Rabid Transit bridge (or Greater Bristol Metrobus, as our new red-trousered Mayor now calls it).

I like the idea of moving Quays Avenue slightly to the left. A level crossing would have alarms and motors that would annoy the people living very close - a matter of a few metres - to the line. Although there has been a continuous campaign since before their homes were planned, and the trackbed has been owned by North Somerset Council, they still did not buy a home next to an active railway. Given the history of most other transport projects, they could be excused for thinking nothing would ever happen. A humpty-backed bridge at the crossing point (right by the roundabout sign)



would not be popular. Building the station east of Quays Avenue would significantly reduce the number of people who would choose to walk to the station to get the train, and I am sure NSDC want to avoid building a huge car park. Shuttle buses won't solve the problem so far as the nearby area goes, but will be very useful in bringing passengers from the far ends of Posset - Redcliffe Bay, Walton in Gordano and such like.
Logged

Now, please!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 12 13 [14] 15 16 ... 72
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page