Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 14:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:46 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
19:04 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:50:09 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[135] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[85] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[36] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[34] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[33] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 72
  Print  
Author Topic: Portishead Line reopening for passengers - ongoing discussion  (Read 384772 times)
martyjon
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1941


View Profile
« Reply #690 on: June 04, 2019, 18:31:42 »

Not the only cancellation. Whilst having a coffee with an insider today he let slip that he had heard of a proposal to modify the Portishead line re-opening into a, hmm, guided busway using composite recycled rubber/plastic moulded sections laid along the track which would still allow freight traffic over the line to Portbury Docks and give greater coverage of the town by running along the towns highways. He said the accountants are happy too, this scheme has had an under £50 million price tag put on it, putting it at less than half that of the Portishead line heavy rail reinstatement estimate, any Bristol forum members aware of any truth in this.
 Huh
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #691 on: June 04, 2019, 19:33:14 »

Not the only cancellation. Whilst having a coffee with an insider today he let slip that he had heard of a proposal to modify the Portishead line re-opening into a, hmm, guided busway using composite recycled rubber/plastic moulded sections laid along the track which would still allow freight traffic over the line to Portbury Docks and give greater coverage of the town by running along the towns highways.

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/local-news/running-buses-along-portishead-railway-2939324

Quote
Proposals to replace the long awaited Portishead rail link with a bus service into the heart of Bristol have been put forward.

The proposal – the idea of former computer engineer Barry Cash – would see plans for a rail line scrapped and a commuter bus service introduced along the route instead.


Mr Cash says instead of restoring and upgrading the rail line between Portishead and the city at a cost of tens of millions, a ‘STRAIL’ system should be used.

STRAIL is a system of thick interlocking panels made from virgin and recycled rubber that fit between and beside railway lines.

They are in use at 30,000 locations on five continents to provide level crossings for road traffic to drive over railways and have been in use for 40 years.

Mr Cash says buses could then go along the route – and to the Cumberland Basin where it could join the existing bus route network.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #692 on: June 04, 2019, 19:43:16 »

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/local-news/running-buses-along-portishead-railway-2939324
Quote
Proposals to replace the long awaited Portishead rail link with a bus service into the heart of Bristol have been put forward.

The proposal – the idea of former computer engineer Barry Cash – would see plans for a rail line scrapped and a commuter bus service introduced along the route instead.

Is that just an idea hatched by a couple of blokes in a pub on the back of a fag packet, or is there anything moire behind it in terms of backing and knowledge, which the Post haven't bother to tell us?
Logged
chuffed
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1499


View Profile
« Reply #693 on: June 04, 2019, 19:50:42 »

This is just the EP rehashing old news yet again. This first came out at about the time of the massive cost increase,and it was roundly derided back then. Now that full funding has been found for a heavy rail scheme...tram train was dismissed as too expensive..... why would you even consider an alternative scheme ? I fear your coffee contact martyjohn, is way behind the curve on this. This needs splitting off back into the Portishead thread. The DCO (Driver Controlled Operation) goes in, in the next few weeks and will probably take 18 months to get through.
« Last Edit: June 04, 2019, 20:12:36 by chuffed » Logged
Reading General
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 410


View Profile
« Reply #694 on: June 04, 2019, 19:52:04 »

I have an even better idea! We could take those buses and run them along tarmac roads between Portishead and Bristol allowing private car owners to also do the same........................... oh no, hang on!
Logged
alan_s
Full Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #695 on: June 04, 2019, 20:09:49 »

New article in evening post:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/local-news/running-buses-along-portishead-railway-2939324

This is the most ridiculous thing I've heard.

Quote
The route needs major investment to re-lay sections of track which have been ripped up, and for a viable shared timetable to be created with the freight companies which use part of the line.

None of the track has been ripped up, it's still there under all the foliage.   

Quote
The buses would be able to pick up from all over Portishead and go straight into the centre of Bristol where eventually it could link up with the current Metrowest bus service.
It would not interfere with the current freight trains using the track, which could be timetabled around the buses.

so if buses can be timetabled around freight trains, why can't passenger trains !!
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #696 on: June 04, 2019, 20:29:15 »

New article in evening post:

https://www.bristolpost.co.uk/news/local-news/running-buses-along-portishead-railway-2939324

This is the most ridiculous thing I've heard.

Earlier report and discussion starts here.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #697 on: June 04, 2019, 20:32:29 »

This is just the EP rehashing old news yet again. This first came out at about the time of the massive cost increase,and it was roundly derided back then. Now that full funding has been found for a heavy rail scheme...tram train was dismissed as too expensive..... why would you even consider an alternative scheme ? I fear your coffee contact martyjohn, is way behind the curve on this. This needs splitting off back into the Portishead thread. The DCO (Driver Controlled Operation) goes in, in the next few weeks and will probably take 18 months to get through.

I will tidy up later ... in the mean time I did a Google search on the name of the chap said to be behind it - and found thisthis and this for starters.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #698 on: June 04, 2019, 20:48:32 »

Some further posts might be joining us shortly because this is beginning to be discussed on "M4 diversion around Newport scrapped" thread, and they could really do with being moved to this thread.

However, someone over there asked if this scheme is something thought up by two blokes in a pub on the back of a fag packet. I have some sympathy with that view...

It looks like the idea has its origins in the Turn Railways into Roads campaign from the late 1950s, which was rubbished then and has not really advanced very far now. Then, as now, the practicalities have not been thought about:

You have, currently, a single track railway line. Even allowing for the railway land on either side, this is not wide enough for a single carriageway road, let alone one that would allow buses to pass (in order to get them in and out of Portishead in the peak, virtually empty buses have to go the other way). The profile of a railway line (ballast and track forming a sort of mound) is incompatible with running road traffic over it so this STRAIL stuff would need to be provided each side of the trackwork, presumably on some sort of trestle that could take the weight of a bus and also not interfere with the drainage arrangements below it.

Would a bus fit through the tunnel on the line? How would you stop other road traffic from trying to use it?

These are just issues that spring immediately to mind without thinking too deeply about the "proposal." Others will come to me in time, as they may well have come to other readers already.

There is however a passage in quotation marks virtually at the bottom of the story, but the journalist gives no indiation of who they are quoting: "Changing the scheme from rail is not something under consideration given the funding is now in place and the DCO (Driver Controlled Operation) application process is in its latter stages."

My first thoughts are that Mr Cash should stick to his day job of engineering computers...
Logged
alan_s
Full Member
***
Posts: 63


View Profile
« Reply #699 on: June 04, 2019, 20:50:11 »

Earlier report and discussion starts here.
Thanks.  Sorry, no idea the BEP were recycling old articles, must be a slow news day!
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #700 on: June 04, 2019, 20:59:51 »

I have merged in posts that started as asideshoot of some Welsh topic  Grin Grin

Original at http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=21707
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #701 on: June 04, 2019, 21:07:15 »

Earlier report and discussion starts here.
Thanks.  Sorry, no idea the BEP were recycling old articles, must be a slow news day!

I'm not sure it was even that - I suspect that a database error at the Bristol Post has caused two old stories to collide and pop out with a new date.

Barry Cash's concept of turning the whole line into an axial level crossing is ironic, given the impossibility of building a conventional one at Quays Avenue... and the second half of the story is a re-run of the news about the DCO (Driver Controlled Operation) process starting, which doesn't relate to Mr Cash's idea at all.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #702 on: June 04, 2019, 21:10:16 »

Some further posts might be joining us shortly because this is beginning to be discussed on "M4 diversion around Newport scrapped" thread, and they could really do with being moved to this thread.

They have indeed been joined in ... hope the cobbling together isn't too bad.

Quote
My first thoughts are that Mr Cash should stick to his day job of engineering computers ...

A sentiment I'm inclined to agree with.  It is, though, excellent to test ideas / plans / directions against independent ideas; in this case the alternative offered just confirms in my mind that the scheme being pressed forward officially is an excellent one, especially compared to that from Mr Cash.  I could come up with a number of other elements in addition to Robins which I see being - err - very serious concerns.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #703 on: June 04, 2019, 21:18:51 »

Quite. I'm not sure why we're dignifying this idea by discussing it!

Red Squirrel's very valid thinking is worth dragging up from a few months ago. This idea is no more. It has ceased to be. It is an ex-idea, all suggestions that this idea is still a going concern are from this moment inoperative. If you hadn't nailed it to the Bristol Post, it would be pushing up the daisies, etc etc.

In any case, give MetroBust a scheme costing £40 million, and they'll find a way to at least treble it, then have to redo it after a couple of years because of having used cheaper recycled condoms instead of new rubber from Malaysia, just to spite the Mayor's besties.

Nah. An even slower news day than usual.
Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #704 on: June 05, 2019, 06:02:50 »

From Grimsby Live

Quote
Boris Johnson says he would reopen Suggitts Lane level crossing if he becomes Prime Minister

Q: What has this to do with Portishead?
A: Perhaps this would allow a level crossing in Portishead to be (re)opened allowing trains closer in

Q: Would Boris have the time to meet promises like this amongst the great affairs of state
A: I really have to wonder ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 45 46 [47] 48 49 ... 72
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page