Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:55 29 Mar 2024
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
* Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
* KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:00 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 12:00:00 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[124] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[49] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[48] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[43] Return of the BRUTE?
[30] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Is every food parcel a nail in HS2's coffin?  (Read 5074 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: April 04, 2020, 06:07:47 »

"Is every food parcel a nail in HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))'s coffin?" asks Patrick Burns of the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page).

Quote
[l-o-n-g snip] ...

But eventually ministers will have to do the sums and face up to the immense challenge of repairing the economic damage that their own "unprecedented intervention" has caused.

It follows that there will have to be a new day of reckoning for all those big-ticket services and projects.

And that could well include High Speed Rail, whatever ministers may have decided in February.
That was before the dawning of this "new normal".
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 783


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 04, 2020, 09:24:55 »

"Is every food parcel a nail in HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))'s coffin?"

It may very well turn out that way, but such an approach will just provide me with more evidence that our current administration is not worthy of my vote. Permitting a transient, albeit serious, difficulty to derail ( Grin) a major part of the government's infrastructure programme would, in my view, be a major abrogation of political responsibility.
Logged
RichardB
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 958


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 04, 2020, 09:58:57 »

"Is every food parcel a nail in HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))'s coffin?" asks Patrick Burns of the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page).

Quote
[l-o-n-g snip] ...

But eventually ministers will have to do the sums and face up to the immense challenge of repairing the economic damage that their own "unprecedented intervention" has caused.

It follows that there will have to be a new day of reckoning for all those big-ticket services and projects.

And that could well include High Speed Rail, whatever ministers may have decided in February.
That was before the dawning of this "new normal".
 

That's a pretty extreme comment from Patrick Burns about blaming the economic damage on the Government's "unprecedented intervention".  In my view, it's plain wrong too.  The Government needed to step in otherwise the damage would be much, much worse.

As for HS2, I don't see any change.  It's a long term project, to be paid for over the long term, and has already been included in the Government's budget calculations.  It provides a lot of work for individuals and companies.  Opponents can hope but I'm confident those hopes will be dashed.
Logged
SandTEngineer
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3485


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 04, 2020, 10:05:31 »

We seem to have two topics discussing HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)).  The latest news (03 April 2020) is here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=5138.msg285406#msg285406
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7749



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 04, 2020, 11:16:18 »

"Is every food parcel a nail in HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))'s coffin?"

It may very well turn out that way, but such an approach will just provide me with more evidence that our current administration is not worthy of my vote. Permitting a transient, albeit serious, difficulty to derail ( Grin) a major part of the government's infrastructure programme would, in my view, be a major abrogation of political responsibility.

For "transient, albeit serious" read "biggest challenge the Nation has faced since 1940" - any responsible administration will by necessity have to re-examine all big ticket expenditure projects in the aftermath taking into account the new economic landscape, and £100 billion + is big ticket by any definition.

If you find such an approach unworthy of your vote, you may struggle to find a party to vote for.

Events, dear boy, Events.
Logged
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: April 04, 2020, 11:30:39 »

"Is every food parcel a nail in HS2 (The next High Speed line(s))'s coffin?"

It may very well turn out that way, but such an approach will just provide me with more evidence that our current administration is not worthy of my vote. Permitting a transient, albeit serious, difficulty to derail ( Grin) a major part of the government's infrastructure programme would, in my view, be a major abrogation of political responsibility.

For "transient, albeit serious" read "biggest challenge the Nation has faced since 1940" - any responsible administration will by necessity have to re-examine all big ticket expenditure projects in the aftermath taking into account the new economic landscape, and £100 billion + is big ticket by any definition.

If you find such an approach unworthy of your vote, you may struggle to find a party to vote for.

Events, dear boy, Events.

Well that is certainly one way of looking at it.

The major difference between HS2 and the current economic situation is that it is not being funded by a pot of government money that is just sitting in their bank accounts (not that cirrent levels of expenditure is, either, but don't jump down my throat just ye!), but by long term loans that will  eventually see some return on capital investment by way of fares. This is not necessarily the case at the moment with the crisis, because much of the money that the overnment is spending is unlikely to be seen again.

My first thought when I saw the article that started this threa off was "beware the bandwagon-jumpers." A couple of weeks ago our local BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) news programme interviewed somebody who was saying that work on Hinkley C Power Station should stop because of covid-19. The only thing was, he was part of the "Stop Hinkley C" campaign.

Well well well, who'd a thunk it?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 04, 2020, 11:48:41 »

No point at all speculating on whether the current crisis will change the recent government decision to proceed, as we have absolutely no idea how long comprehensive travel restrictions will be in places and how travel patterns will settle down after it's 'over'. 

I agree with TG that many things will have to be re-examined, but an initial fall off doesn't necessarily make it sensible to cancel in the longer term, especially when you consider the boost to engineering, construction and supply companies that it gives.  After all, it didn't take too long for the airline industry numbers to recover from the September 2001 attacks, see the first graph here: https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/is.air.psgr?end=2018&start=1970&view=chart - though, depending how long it lasts the effects of the virus are quite possibly going to be far more profound.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 501


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 04, 2020, 12:59:11 »

It's unlikely but I'm hoping the recovery might see more responsible corporate governance. No more 8 figure bonuses for Executives whilst they complain about paying people a living wage.

Some companies have responded by cutting exec salaries but others like the banks have had to be forced into it so I'm not hopeful.

The last financial crash didn't seem to make much different to the excesses of corporate culture.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 04, 2020, 13:20:43 »

It will depend on political decisions and as mentioned on post-covid travel patterns, which are likely to develop in the long term. Governments spending money now doesn't mean they can't spend it later; quantitative easing / magic money tree / new deal policies / whatever you want to call it, is the choice around the world right now.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 04, 2020, 13:51:25 »

It will depend on political decisions and as mentioned on post-covid travel patterns, which are likely to develop in the long term. Governments spending money now doesn't mean they can't spend it later; quantitative easing / magic money tree / new deal policies / whatever you want to call it, is the choice around the world right now.

It used to be called Keynesian Economics after John Maynard Keynes a Cambridge Professor who founded the subject of macroeconomics in the 1930's. Keynesian economics was as Bmblbzzz points out the basis for Roosevelt's New Deal and later the Marshall Plan to rebuilt Europe after WW2. It was considered orthodoxy until the monetarists came along in the 1980's.  The failure of austerity was already making it more popular again and I think Covid-19 is likely to seal this.   

The basis of the theory is that if every time someone buys something most of the money is passed on to someone else in wages and they then spend that so that other people get wages.  For this to work we need the money to go to people who will spend it (typically not the rich who will tend to save it) and on things where the proportion of the cost used to pay wages is highest. Also spending it where the wages will be paid in this country. 

So what is the thing governments can spend money on that best meets these criteria?  The answer now as it was in the 1930's is construction.  In the 1930's government built roads  and lent money to the railways to do massive investment in rail improvements.  If the war had not stopped it this would have included the Dawlish cutt-off.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 04, 2020, 14:49:24 »

Oh yes, J.M. Keynes. Most people think of him in connection with Milton Keynes, "the only town in the known universe named after two economists". I think of him every time I can't remember how to spell Keyn(e)sham.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7749



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2020, 16:59:07 »

It will depend on political decisions and as mentioned on post-covid travel patterns, which are likely to develop in the long term. Governments spending money now doesn't mean they can't spend it later; quantitative easing / magic money tree / new deal policies / whatever you want to call it, is the choice around the world right now.

It used to be called Keynesian Economics after John Maynard Keynes a Cambridge Professor who founded the subject of macroeconomics in the 1930's. Keynesian economics was as Bmblbzzz points out the basis for Roosevelt's New Deal and later the Marshall Plan to rebuilt Europe after WW2. It was considered orthodoxy until the monetarists came along in the 1980's.  The failure of austerity was already making it more popular again and I think Covid-19 is likely to seal this.   

The basis of the theory is that if every time someone buys something most of the money is passed on to someone else in wages and they then spend that so that other people get wages.  For this to work we need the money to go to people who will spend it (typically not the rich who will tend to save it) and on things where the proportion of the cost used to pay wages is highest. Also spending it where the wages will be paid in this country. 

So what is the thing governments can spend money on that best meets these criteria?  The answer now as it was in the 1930's is construction.  In the 1930's government built roads  and lent money to the railways to do massive investment in rail improvements.  If the war had not stopped it this would have included the Dawlish cutt-off.

Given that it's taken a huge uplift in public spending to lift the UK (United Kingdom)'s growth forecast to 1% this year (prior to Corona virus), and given the colossal cost of the Corona virus to the Government and overall economy, how, and by how much would you say Government spending would have to increase to reach a similar growth figure to that which existed in the period you allude to in the 1930s? (circa 4%), particularly since Business investment is predicted to fall thanks to Brexit etc.
« Last Edit: April 04, 2020, 17:07:12 by TaplowGreen » Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2020, 18:31:35 »

Given that it's taken a huge uplift in public spending to lift the UK (United Kingdom)'s growth forecast to 1% this year (prior to Corona virus), and given the colossal cost of the Corona virus to the Government and overall economy, how, and by how much would you say Government spending would have to increase to reach a similar growth figure to that which existed in the period you allude to in the 1930s? (circa 4%), particularly since Business investment is predicted to fall thanks to Brexit etc.

A very good question. The simple answer is it depends what they spend it on. Look for investment in new hospital buildings, roads, rail, and possibly also housing. 

However I suspect the development of and industrial policy will be much more of complex affair post Corona Virus.  The fact that we were reliant on imports from a very few suppliers for some key goods may drive a industrial policy away from the ultra free-marketeers.  More so if the US carries on its reported policy of hijacking of goods destined for other countries in various parts of the world especially where they are made by US companies.  Increasing UK manufacture of essential goods will go down well in the Tory northern wall seats. 

Even before the Corona Virus there have been shortages of some drugs because of quality issues at a single manufacture, because drug companies had consolidated manufacture in one place.   
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 783


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 05, 2020, 08:51:39 »

...If you find such an approach unworthy of your vote, you may struggle to find a party to vote for. ...

Correct answer!  Smiley
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7749



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 05, 2020, 09:30:34 »

Given that it's taken a huge uplift in public spending to lift the UK (United Kingdom)'s growth forecast to 1% this year (prior to Corona virus), and given the colossal cost of the Corona virus to the Government and overall economy, how, and by how much would you say Government spending would have to increase to reach a similar growth figure to that which existed in the period you allude to in the 1930s? (circa 4%), particularly since Business investment is predicted to fall thanks to Brexit etc.

A very good question. The simple answer is it depends what they spend it on. Look for investment in new hospital buildings, roads, rail, and possibly also housing. 

However I suspect the development of and industrial policy will be much more of complex affair post Corona Virus.  The fact that we were reliant on imports from a very few suppliers for some key goods may drive a industrial policy away from the ultra free-marketeers.  More so if the US carries on its reported policy of hijacking of goods destined for other countries in various parts of the world especially where they are made by US companies.  Increasing UK manufacture of essential goods will go down well in the Tory northern wall seats. 

Even before the Corona Virus there have been shortages of some drugs because of quality issues at a single manufacture, because drug companies had consolidated manufacture in one place.   

I guess everyone is a Keynesian in a foxhole  Wink
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page