Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:15 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:27:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
Author Topic: Steepest Gradient on GWR?  (Read 7800 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #15 on: April 09, 2020, 19:46:50 »

Coombe Junction to Liskeard is 1 in 40 plus an 8 chains radius on the curves. No chance of a run-up on that!

My goodness yes ... I made the mistake of walking from Coombe Junction to Liskeard early last month.  Well - more staggering and panting up the road.

The hill gradient between Coombe Junction and Liskeard.  One of the few UK (United Kingdom) cases where the railway goes a long way round to rise more gently.  See also Dduallt.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 09, 2020, 20:39:04 »

1 in 6.25 (16%)?

Tis but a gentle slope.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/uk-wales-52215151
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 10, 2020, 13:24:42 »

The Tamar Valley Line has Gradients of 1 in 37 between Bere Alston and Gunnislake.
Logged
froome
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 901


View Profile Email
« Reply #18 on: April 10, 2020, 16:34:47 »

Of course, if GWR (Great Western Railway) were ever to take over the running of the line between Lynton and Lynmouth...  Grin
Logged
phile
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1382

Language spoken Welsh as well as English


View Profile Email
« Reply #19 on: April 10, 2020, 17:36:41 »

The climb out of the Severn Tunnel
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 10, 2020, 18:46:52 »

How steep is the London end of Portsmouth and Southsea high level?  It always feels quite a sudden gradient...

1 in 61.

The climb out of the Severn Tunnel

1 in 90.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2257


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 10, 2020, 19:26:50 »

Forgive me if it's already been answered elsewhere but do NR» (Network Rail - home page) have a stated maximum acceptable gradient for new builds and if so, is it less than some of the gradients they've inherited?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #22 on: April 10, 2020, 20:23:17 »

Forgive me if it's already been answered elsewhere but do NR» (Network Rail - home page) have a stated maximum acceptable gradient for new builds and if so, is it less than some of the gradients they've inherited?

I have a suspicion that the new build limiting gradient would be surprisingly steep - look at how Eurostar ducks and weaves out of King's Cross.  For a station, rule are probably pretty tight on gradient and curvature.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 10, 2020, 21:02:41 »

Whilst trying to find the Acton Diveunder gradient I think I remember saying that they had to use concrete slab track due to the 1 in 40 gradient.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
JontyMort
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 342


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 10, 2020, 22:21:05 »

Forgive me if it's already been answered elsewhere but do NR» (Network Rail - home page) have a stated maximum acceptable gradient for new builds and if so, is it less than some of the gradients they've inherited?

I have a suspicion that the new build limiting gradient would be surprisingly steep - look at how Eurostar ducks and weaves out of King's Cross.  For a station, rule are probably pretty tight on gradient and curvature.

The modern one that is usually quoted is from St Paul’s Thameslink (aka City Thameslink) up to Blackfriars, which I think is steeper than 1 in 30. That is of course quite short, passenger only, and electrified. I remember when they revamped it to put the line under Ludgate Hill they lowered the northern abutment of the bridge over Queen Victoria Street (i.e. just north of Blackfriars) so that the bridge section was on the gradient, so they must have thought it was pretty tight.

The real game-changer is electric traction. I recommend a 323 up the Lickey, about a minute quicker than a 170 Bromsgrove to Barnt Green (start-to-pass).
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 10, 2020, 23:24:12 »

I've quoted before that Crossrail has 1 in 27 in three places in its tunnels. Obviously being indoors in the dry makes that less of a problem, but I recall that some high-sped lines have around the same  gradient, and live outdoors: The Schnellfahrstrecke Köln–Rhein/Main has 4% so as to avoid wiggliness. Whether the ICE3s use any trickery to give them better grip than 50% of axles motored would suggest, I don't know.
Logged
BBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 634


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2020, 10:29:32 »

I've quoted before that Crossrail has 1 in 27 in three places in its tunnels. Obviously being indoors in the dry makes that less of a problem, but I recall that some high-sped lines have around the same  gradient, and live outdoors: The Schnellfahrstrecke Köln–Rhein/Main has 4% so as to avoid wiggliness. Whether the ICE3s use any trickery to give them better grip than 50% of axles motored would suggest, I don't know.

Some years ago I managed to get a front seat with a forward view in an ICE3 along this line and the switchback nature of it was very clear. I was able to see the speedometer in the driver's cab and I was impressed to see how closely it kept to 300 km/h along the route, only dipping slightly on the upward gradients.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 11, 2020, 12:02:20 »

I've quoted before that Crossrail has 1 in 27 in three places in its tunnels. Obviously being indoors in the dry makes that less of a problem, but I recall that some high-sped lines have around the same  gradient, and live outdoors: The Schnellfahrstrecke Köln–Rhein/Main has 4% so as to avoid wiggliness. Whether the ICE3s use any trickery to give them better grip than 50% of axles motored would suggest, I don't know.

Some years ago I managed to get a front seat with a forward view in an ICE3 along this line and the switchback nature of it was very clear. I was able to see the speedometer in the driver's cab and I was impressed to see how closely it kept to 300 km/h along the route, only dipping slightly on the upward gradients.

So, you never saw one attempt a hill start in the rain? I wonder if it could do that!

One of the less obvious effects of high-speed travel is that improves hill-climbing. An ICE3 has nothing like enough power to climb 4% with no speed loss - that alone calls for 15 MW, and it only has 8 MW in all (mostly spoken for by drag and friction). However, it has loads of kinetic energy, and can trade a bit of that for the potential energy it needs at the top of the hill. And that trade-off gets more favourable the faster it goes, which somehow doesn't sound right.

For a small time interval (hence small changes in everything else) and a height gain of h, the speed drops by 2gh/v - which gets smaller the higher the speed v (in m/s, for SI units throughout). But this trick only works for short sharp rises, so if you start at 300 km/hr, that falls to 295 for a rise of 10 m, 278 for 50 m, 254 for 100 m, and down to 200 m/s for 200 m. That assumes the traction power is just enough to maintain the actual speed on the level, but if more is available it can top up the energy lost. Those speed drops are the same for any gradient, but the gentler that is the more time there is for any surplus traction power to make up the loss.

On the Köln–Rhein/Main line the overall height range is 50-350 m, but the steep bits will be only small parts of that - I'm not sure exactly where; climbing out of valleys perhaps?
Logged
smokey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1129


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 11, 2020, 14:18:16 »

Somebody will know the answer, not GWR (Great Western Railway) territory, but whats the ruling gradient of the SMR (both of them)? Cheesy




Snaefell  Mountain Railway  Grin

Snowdon Mountain Railway  Grin






Logged
bradshaw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1450



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 11, 2020, 14:42:28 »

Snaefell 1:12 ruling gradient
Snowdon 1:7.86

edit
Many years ago Ian Allan published
British Main Line - Gradient Profiles covering the whole the country
17 profiles covered the GWR (Great Western Railway), which included some ex-SR(resolve) and S&DR lines
Braunton to Mortehoe was around 1:40
« Last Edit: April 11, 2020, 14:56:32 by bradshaw » Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page