Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:55 28 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 00:08:42 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 42
  Print  
Author Topic: Okehampton-Tavistock. Discussion on reopening and potential use as a diversionary route  (Read 268818 times)
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #375 on: February 07, 2014, 14:33:23 »

Reopening the line between Tavistock and Okehampton (I'm taking it for granted that Bere Alston-Tavistock will reopen) would have more benefits than just providing a diversion route.

Although, as already mentioned many times, it runs through relatively sparsely populated country, it would provide a much closer railhead for a wide catchment area spanning North Cornwall and North and West Devon. generating new custom and reducing road/bus journeys.

Okehampton services sharing the Exeter-Yeoford stretch would, I imagine, reduce overcrowding on Barnstaple services, too.

I'd be interested to read what kind of service would be best for this route. How would a regular service pattern consisting of a Tavistock-Plymouth commuter shuttle interconnecting at Bere Alston with a Gunnislake-Exeter service compare with a Plymouth-Exeter service connecting with a Bere Alston-Gunnislake shuttle?   
   
« Last Edit: February 07, 2014, 17:16:29 by Andy » Logged
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #376 on: February 07, 2014, 15:27:31 »

By the time such a link could be reinstated there will have been a cascade of suitable 3 car dmus to operate an hourly Exeter to Plymouth service.

However, if this route proves faster and more reliable than the coastal one, perhaps rebuild it to mainline standards and operate the GWR (Great Western Railway) line as a secondary line and all high speed services to operate via Okehampton.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #377 on: February 07, 2014, 15:41:51 »

The reversal would add a considerable amount of time to through services though. That reversal can be taken out though if through services from Waterloo were considered, but that won't be as quick a journey to Plymouth as is currently offered (when everything is open!) by the route from Paddington.

I'd prefer to see an inland route built, to modern high speed standards, between Exeter and Newton Abbot. Something the GWR (Great Western Railway) were set to do in the late 1930s, before the Second World War put the kybosh on the plans.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #378 on: February 07, 2014, 17:57:36 »


I'd prefer to see an inland route built, to modern high speed standards, between Exeter and Newton Abbot. Something the GWR (Great Western Railway) were set to do in the late 1930s, before the Second World War put the kybosh on the plans.

I can see the benefits of this, but it's hard to imagine it getting off the ground - I'm guessing you'd have to put pretty much the whole thing in tunnels to appease the environmental lobby, which would cost a few orders of magnitude more than reopening the LSWR (London South Western Railway) route.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
wabbit
Full Member
***
Posts: 30


View Profile
« Reply #379 on: February 07, 2014, 18:47:53 »

One direct effect of faster connections from the West Country would be to increase the amount of people who would shift from cars to rail, but if that was linked in with new housing developments, served by rail, you could have a viable series of routes both sea side and inland. It needs a properly joined up approach from local government and NR» (Network Rail - home page). Fingers crossed!
Logged
AMLAG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 227


View Profile
« Reply #380 on: February 07, 2014, 20:22:41 »

NR» (Network Rail - home page) in its 'Situational Awareness' Briefing note issued on 5/2/14 with regards to the Dawlish Sea wall major incident, states it has no plans to promote re-opening of the former main line from Exeter to Plymouth via Okehampton & Tavistock and mentions a few negative facts such as rebuilding of a Viaduct at Okehampton  (possibly this is a reference to Meldon) and that the disused former railway land is in multi ownership .. ignoring the fact that over 10 miles of infrastructure are now resurrected and maintained as a cycle track in the hands of one owner.

Well so be it.. the Government is now reviewing all options and it may think otherwise - just as Devon County Council does with regards to reopening Bere Alston to Tavistock and some may be surprised to learn that it is DCC» (Devon County Council - website)  NOT NR who is now acquiring the disused railway trackbed,land and infrastructure to enable this to be done.

A quick 'back of a fag packet' calculation shows the potential population to be served by a re-instated Exeter/Okehampton/Sourton Parkway/Tavistock/Plymouth alternative & diversionary rail route to be significantly greater than the population to be served by the far more challenging 30+ miles of railway currently being re-instated by the Scottish Govt. between Galashiels & Edinburgh for opening in 2015.
Logged
Umberleigh
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 456


View Profile
« Reply #381 on: February 07, 2014, 20:43:15 »

I imagine the M5 was built on land owned by a multitude of owners, ditto every bypass, dual carriageway and motorway built ever. Oh, and HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)). And I'm sure a new viaduct at Meldon would cost less than ^42bn. Seriously NR» (Network Rail - home page), what feeble excuses.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18894



View Profile
« Reply #382 on: February 07, 2014, 20:51:23 »

I can see the benefits of this, but it's hard to imagine it getting off the ground - I'm guessing you'd have to put pretty much the whole thing in tunnels to appease the environmental lobby, which would cost a few orders of magnitude more than reopening the LSWR (London South Western Railway) route.

The whole of HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) isn't going into tunnels to appease enviromentalists. No reason why an inland route has to do so. Branch off at Exminster, head due south to the left of Malmhead, then head south west to the south of Ashcombe and Ideford Common, following the river valley (Dawlish Water?) and then run parallel to the A380 into Newton Abbot. Sparsely populated land and possibly only a need for tunneling under the Powderham estate and to the west of Kenton. Around 15 miles of new build. Compared with a similar length of rebuilding between Okehampton and Tavistock, but without the need for services from London Paddington to Cornwall to reverse twice.

Does anyone know of the cost per mile of new build double track railway versus reinstating and upgrading 50 year old abandoned permanent way to modern double track standard? Remembering that the latter would have to go through the centre of Tavistock. I imagine the cost difference is pretty marginal.

A thorough cost/benefit analysis of all options should be carried out. My preference is for an inland 'GWR (Great Western Railway)' route, but if reinstating Okehampton - Tavistock/Bere Alston and upgrading the existing stubs to modern mainline standards comes out as the considerably better value for money option, then I'm happy for that to be the alternative route to Plymouth and Cornwall. Won't help Torbay though.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #383 on: February 07, 2014, 20:52:42 »

Is there a consensus on a viable route through Tavistock?

Anyone?? Or are we just drawing an undetermined line on the map through the town at this stage?
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
AMLAG
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 227


View Profile
« Reply #384 on: February 07, 2014, 21:08:44 »


Re-instatement through Tavistock via the former Southern (Tavistock North stn) route..a few houses to demolish; none of significant/historic/listed value....nothing like on the scale of the Galashiels/Edinburgh re-instatement though.
A new bridge (concrete?) would be needed over the Tavistock/Callington road ..was one of the very few steel bridges between Meldon and Bere Alston ..cut up for scrap.
Partial reduction in size of the West Devon Borough Council offices built so shortsightedly by them (!!) on railway formation and mainly in the old Upside Goods Yard.
WDBC like most Councils, is now constantly down sizing/outsourcing/combining functions with other Councils etc and in any case(if they survive) may have to vacate to smaller premises for their shrinking staff.
Logged
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #385 on: February 07, 2014, 21:21:48 »

Is there a consensus on a viable route through Tavistock?

Anyone?? Or are we just drawing an undetermined line on the map through the town at this stage?

I'd have thought there was only one possible route and that would be the one that was used before 1968.For sure there has been some encroachment on the line-infill at the back of Kelly College,the WDBC offices and housing on the site of Tavistock North station and a bungalow across the line near the broken bridge over Callington Road.There would doubtless be much wailing and gnashing of teeth from parties affected [understandably so,to be fair] but any CPO action would be rather minor compared to the works carried out in rebuilding the Borders railway.I can't really think of any other way that Tavistock could accomodate any reopened railway,open to suggestions of course.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #386 on: February 07, 2014, 21:49:25 »

Would a new station be built in the centre of Tavistock, and if so, in which precise location? Would a station also still be built at the site earmarked in the current Tavistock-Bere Alston proposal.

In the Borders scheme, how many people have been forced out of their homes in centres of population comparable to Tavistock, and what has their reaction been to that?
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
34104
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 128


View Profile
« Reply #387 on: February 07, 2014, 22:17:34 »

Would a new station be built in the centre of Tavistock, and if so, in which precise location? Would a station also still be built at the site earmarked in the current Tavistock-Bere Alston proposal.

In the Borders scheme, how many people have been forced out of their homes in centres of population comparable to Tavistock, and what has their reaction been to that?

Good question actually,in all truth it would be better to have a station closer to Tavistock town centre than the one proposed in the current plans.I suppose the ideal site would still be Tavistock North,the down platform and buildings of which still exist-couldn't see any reason why it shouldn't become a working station again if the appropriate clearance took place.As for the Borders railway,not sure how many but it was a substantial number and people did get upset;


http://www.rmweb.co.uk/community/index.php?/topic/38527-borders-railway-progress/page-5

http://www.railforums.co.uk/showthread.php?t=59833&page=2






« Last Edit: February 07, 2014, 22:27:39 by 34104 » Logged
chopper1944
Full Member
***
Posts: 49


View Profile
« Reply #388 on: February 08, 2014, 04:39:15 »

Wasn't there a limitation on the type of locomotive able to cross meldon viaduct?
Would a HST (High Speed Train) be able to cross it or any of the proposed new trains to be made available
Following electrification of the GWML (Great Western Main Line)?
Logged
trainbuff
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 245


View Profile
« Reply #389 on: February 08, 2014, 05:23:44 »

Wasn't there a limitation on the type of locomotive able to cross meldon viaduct?
Would a HST (High Speed Train) be able to cross it or any of the proposed new trains to be made available
Following electrification of the GWML (Great Western Main Line)?


There were weight restrictions. Up until the 1960's for instance, only unrebuilt Bulleid pacifics could us the route. Rebuilds weighing more. Meldon was strengthened in the 1960's though. It has been used more recently than that though and retained track as a railhead on the former up line till the 1990's. Used as a headshunt for stone trains!!! I cant think of anything heavier. The former up line was used as a road to take stone to the building of Meldon Resevoir.

I think part of the argument about closing the line in 1968 was about weight concerns on this viaduct. Though as seen before often reasons put forward were disingenious to say the least. Of course it now carries a cyclepath and footway and was made safe to carry only that weight when the charity that owns it renovated. It would need looking at again to check weight limits
Logged

Invest in Railways in Devon and Cornwall!
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 24 25 [26] 27 28 ... 42
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page