Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:15 28 Mar 2024
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:20 Reading to Shalford
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:11 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 19:40 Redhill to Reading
19:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 20:33:25 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[118] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[116] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[89] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] Return of the BRUTE?
[38] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[28] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Question 6 – 18 Jun 2020: Over-carries  (Read 5290 times)
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« on: June 18, 2020, 17:30:59 »

There have been two (reported) incidents of passengers being over-carried at Trowbridge with train doors not being released. In view of it being multiple incidents coming to attention, it's likely to have happened elsewhere too. With few passengers getting on or off, and with train managers spending much more time in cabs, how are GWR (Great Western Railway) ensuring against over-carries, and what steps are in place to get people back when it happens?  In both reported cases, the passenger concerned was significantly late on a key work journey, and were left feeling distinctly uncared-for when they managed to get off at the next station.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Samyutha Bala
Transport Scholar
Jr. Member
******
Posts: 12


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2020, 17:35:15 »


Incidents such as this are uncommon and any station “fail to call” is classified as a ‘safety of the line’ incident and is taken very seriously with extensive follow-up to ensure it doesn’t happen again.  If you’re able to provide specific details (date and time) of the two instances mentioned, we would be happy to look into this.


The point that train managers/conductors are spending more time in cabs due to COVID-19 may well be true, but this would not cause a fail to call incident.


Of course, if a customer has been over-carried due to an error on our part (fail to call) we would absolutely provide alternatives to get them to their intended destination. In some instances, the quickest option may be a return train journey from the next station, but a taxi could also be provided if that wasn’t a viable option. 
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: June 19, 2020, 11:43:25 »


Incidents such as this are uncommon and any station “fail to call” is classified as a ‘safety of the line’ incident and is taken very seriously with extensive follow-up to ensure it doesn’t happen again.  If you’re able to provide specific details (date and time) of the two instances mentioned, we would be happy to look into this.

Many thanks for the reply;  some further data and clarification.

I am aware of these incidents and in both cases the train DID» (Didcot Parkway - next trains) call - not failures to call.  The problem was that the doors weren't released.   Both are 'in the system' already as individual cases.   

A similar problem occurred from time to time at Melksham in the past, when the platform was shorter and single door operation was being used.   The question last night was intended to be a generic one - "how do you prevent ..." what is something that's come back to attention, and perhaps is also happening from time to time at other places such as Avoncliff and (with Covid) has reared its head at full length platforms too.

Quote
Of course, if a customer has been over-carried due to an error on our part (fail to call) we would absolutely provide alternatives to get them to their intended destination. In some instances, the quickest option may be a return train journey from the next station, but a taxi could also be provided if that wasn’t a viable option. 

You would hope, wouldn't you?  Let's just say the situation on the ground has not always mirrored policy.  And, yes, sometimes the quickest option is a return train - which is also the most pragmatic option.  We run the danger of looking at individual cases here. Question remains "how do you avoid it happening?".
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Jason Ness
Transport Scholar
Newbie
******
Posts: 9



View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2020, 09:16:02 »

Hi Grahame,

For the specific incidents, we have an obligation to make sure our customers reach their destination. If that’s not been possible, in this instance because someone was overcarried because we didn’t open the doors, staff at the next station (or via the help point if it’s an un-staffed station) should arrange for the customer to be returned to that destination station. That should always be by the quickest route, and it’s worth mentioning that for anyone travelling on a single, return, or weekly ticket, a delay of 15 minutes or more qualifies for Delay Repay compensation (that’s not available to ST holders at the moment I’m afraid).

I’d be interested to hear of any examples where we didn’t arrange that onward transport and/or customers felt ‘un-cared for’ – that should never be the case.

Operationally any failure to let customers disembark at the planned station is disappointing and, as you’d imagine, is something we take seriously. Our Operational teams will pick the issue up with the individual/s concerned to make sure there is no repeat and if there is anything specific that had led to the incidents, such as a shorter platform, or SDO (Selective Door Opening), we’ll re-brief the wider team.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2020, 10:07:07 »

Is there a possibility of "doors enabled for opening but passenger didn't think they were or didn't manage to open one"? And consequently a grey area between that and "doors not enable for opening", which could lead to arguments with staff. The point is more that there may be an element of doubt in a staff member's mind about what really happened, rather than the underlying truth (which can't be determined at the time).

As to passengers being over-carried due to their own getting confused, I suspect it's a lot more common than you imagine - and if the passenger realises that's what happened they won't tell anyone. I'm not sure if any particularr stock has this problem with inside door buttons, but it was (presumably still is) on the outside of 165/6s. You would get used to the inside buttons lighting up when enabled, but might go for a long time never having to open a door from outside because someone inside always did it for you. So the first time you needed to open a door from the platform - no light! So you wait for the light ...

Of course differences between different stock can give the same confusion in the passenger's mind about "is this ready to open?". While logically you push the button anyway, fear of being trapped in a train can cause mild panic in some people, leading to actions that look irrational with hindsight.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: June 23, 2020, 10:38:55 »

Jason, and Stuving

The question raised was as a systemic one and not a new issue, though aspects of recent cases suggest that it's more likely to happen due to changes at present, and that cases may have different metrics.

Jason, I will drop you a separate note with what I know;  our public forum is not the place to publish stuff that can identify individual operational staff and/or public members unless they themselves post here in public.  The wider readership here can be reassured that there has been some follow up - at least in one case, though I suspect via a different route / department to Jason's.

Systemic question last week.  Good to have been brought up so that it can be wider-mentioned to operational teams for them to bear in mind the increased risk of over carrying in some circumstances in these different times.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page