Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 28 Mar 2024
* Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:29 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
12:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:26 Okehampton to Exeter Central
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 13:40:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Green strings for airlines getting bailed out - and now for the others too  (Read 2029 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« on: June 22, 2020, 20:55:07 »

This idea of green strings has been around for a while, with Mark Carney (from under his new UN hat) promoting the idea back in early May.The EU» (European Union - about) commission was agin' it, but the conditions attached to injections of government cash into Air France and Austrian did include reducing domestic routes. Now the French government has said it will prevent other carriers (read low-cost ones) picking up those routes.

They have a particular reason to do this, wanting to appear to take some notice of the citizens' climate convention that reported yesterday. This odd constitutional beastie had members chosen by lot and two co-chairs well to the green of centre, and was asked to find ways to cut CO2 by 40% by 2030. It came up with some quite radical demands-cum-suggestions (it's not clear what its status is), but only in the areas that weren't too difficult to even touch. I think there was one about banning domestic flights, but I can't find it now and the actual text isn't visible yet.

Anyway, the plan is that any flight within France where the "same" journey has a time by train of under 21/2 hours will not be allowed.
« Last Edit: June 23, 2020, 08:58:30 by stuving » Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2020, 21:11:15 »

Interesting idea.  Just shows you what can be done when you have a comprehensive high speed rail network.   Wink
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 23, 2020, 08:48:04 »

It also ties into the post-Covid* mood of retrenchment and what can be called either shortening supply chains or economic nationalism,** depending on preference.

*Yeah, I know Covid is still here and the mood was present before, but the pandemic has both strengthened and legitimised it.
**Some have even called it autarchy, which is rather an exaggeration.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 23, 2020, 12:43:41 »

I am not convinced that airlines should be bailed out, even with "green strings"
Air travel burns a great deal of fossil fuel.

Let most of the airlines go bust, and many of the less used airports.
The surviving airlines would then have to charge higher fares that better reflected the true and not subsidised costs of running the operation.

I would consider subsidy of a handful of individual routes, but only in exceptional circumstances when air transport is the only viable link to remote communities.
I see no merit in subsidising popular routes within mainland Europe, let the market decide WITHOUT subsidy.

Spend the money saved by not bailing out airlines on railways.
More trains.
Faster trains.
Longer trains.
Battery trains, where 25 KV not viable.

Mail and express parcels should go by rail whenever possible. Urgent and perishable freight also.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 23, 2020, 13:35:20 »

I am not convinced that airlines should be bailed out, even with "green strings"
Air travel burns a great deal of fossil fuel.

Let most of the airlines go bust, and many of the less used airports.
The surviving airlines would then have to charge higher fares that better reflected the true and not subsidised costs of running the operation.

I would consider subsidy of a handful of individual routes, but only in exceptional circumstances when air transport is the only viable link to remote communities.
I see no merit in subsidising popular routes within mainland Europe, let the market decide WITHOUT subsidy.

Spend the money saved by not bailing out airlines on railways.
More trains.
Faster trains.
Longer trains.
Battery trains, where 25 KV not viable.

Mail and express parcels should go by rail whenever possible. Urgent and perishable freight also.

Every one a winner.......🤦‍♂️😉
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2023, 00:20:55 »

That plan to ban all domestic air routes with an alternative by rail taking less that 2h30m did make it into a law two years ago. It hasn't quite been enacted yet, but airlines were told to get ready for it and in any case Air France's bail-out plan made them do some of it.

So, what has actually happened? There were three routes dropped right away, from Orly to Nantes, Bordeaux, and Lyon. They would probably have closed anyway, for standard commercial reasons, since enough passengers found the train preferable to make them unprofitable. Similar routes from CDG, however, still operate, including one to Rennes where the train's time is shortest of all.

These are ones Air France wanted to keep, as feeders for long-haul services. The government wanted to make an exception for that explicitly, but the EU» (European Union - about) said no to that, so a sneakier way to do the same thing was found. There are TGVs (Train a Grande Vitesse) - not many, but some - from the station at CDG, and they were used as the comparator, and St ExupĂ©ry for Lyon. That lengthens the train times, but even so for Rennes and Lyon they were under 2h30m. But the few trains that run don't include early and late times to fit with the long-haul services, so the train option could be found not a viable alternative.

I'm sure someone would be complaining about this, if they weren't all busy complaining about something else at the moment.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 24, 2023, 12:15:26 »

That plan to ban all domestic air routes with an alternative by rail taking less that 2h30m did make it into a law two years ago. It hasn't quite been enacted yet, but airlines were told to get ready for it and in any case Air France's bail-out plan made them do some of it.

That law has now been formally enacted, having had to wait for a study by the EC into a complaint by some airlines that it was against EU» (European Union - about) single market rules and in any case not an effective counter to climate change. That study has not led to any changes, and the law still includes the let-outs for connecting to long-haul flights, use of trains from CDG as comparators, and a requirement for trains at the times flights need them. So it only affects the three services that were closed back in 2020.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page