Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 18 Apr 2024
* Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (2018)
SEWWEB leaflet launched and Aztec West (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:14 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
19:46 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:28 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
Delayed
16:18 London Paddington to Swansea
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 18:35:07 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[185] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[46] Signage - not making it easy ...
[23] IETs at Melksham
[21] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[19] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[18] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Plymouth in 180 minutes- what's possible.  (Read 6370 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« on: July 16, 2020, 09:41:32 »

The 06:37 from Paddington - usually the "under 3 hour" train to Plymouth - is only running to Exeter St Davids.  It left Paddington 30 minutes late this morning, and yet was only 23 minutes late into Exeter, 2 of the 7 minutes gained being on a shorter-than-scheduled stop at Reading.  Interesting to see what can be done ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1930


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 17, 2020, 06:55:52 »

No pesky passengers?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: July 17, 2020, 08:01:55 »

No pesky passengers?

That may have saved those 2 Reading minutes ... but just how much difference does the passenger load make on a train's performance?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
ray951
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 462


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: July 17, 2020, 09:34:26 »

No pesky passengers?

That may have saved those 2 Reading minutes ... but just how much difference does the passenger load make on a train's performance?
I would say not much based on the following figures:

A 5 car class 800 weighs 243 tonnes, according to Wikipedia.
It has 326 seats, if each passenger weighs 75kg then that is 24 tonnes.
So a full train of passengers would add 10% to the total weight.

I would suggest that a 10% increase in weight wouldn't decrease the performance by much, also need to consider that as it nears Plymouth the weight of the fuel wll drop. How much fuel does a 5-car class 800 use between London and Plymouth?
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 17, 2020, 10:13:57 »

You notice hardly any difference in performance whether there’s five or five hundred people on board.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
southwest
Guest
« Reply #5 on: November 14, 2020, 00:32:19 »

Hopefully after coronavirus we might see the reinstatement of non stop express' from Exeter. Maybe even one from Plymouth for a change.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #6 on: November 14, 2020, 06:29:43 »

Hopefully after coronavirus we might see the reinstatement of non stop express' from Exeter. Maybe even one from Plymouth for a change.

Rail transport will be provided to meet the travel requirements in the medium and long term, and I would suspect that mass travel requirements will not be for long distance journeys at specific times of day where a few minutes of saving will be of critical essence.

A PAD» (Paddington (London) - next trains)-PLY» (Plymouth - next trains) nonestop service provides for one journey. A PAD-RDG(resolve)-TAU» (Taunton - next trains)-TVP-EXD» (Exeter St Davids - next trains)-NTA» (Newton Abbott - next trains)-PLY service provides for 21 journeys, many of them quite short but quite high volume, and with 21 so many more journey opportunities it makes economic sense to run it hourly rather than trying to find a couple of times a day when it will generate enough traffic.

A PAD-PLY nonestop service over a pair of lines that is also carrying a "Devon Metro" service, regional trains, and services heading for the Midlands and North which will be making intermediate stops, with conflicting movements across junctions at / near Newton Abbott, Cowley Bridge, Southcote and perhaps Norton Fitzwarren will eat up paths and add to a proponsity for delays in service group to impact on another which has been shoe-horned in.

A PAD-PLY nonestop service would do no good for the economic wellbeing of Reading, Taunton, Exeter or Torbay in its race for Plymouth.

As a political statement, there is a shakey case for a daily service from each end arriving at - say - 09:15 and leaving back at 17:15, with a 165 minute run time. But that suggests that the business meeting will be back in quantity when so many people have come to realise that criss-crossing the country for such events may not be the best use of their time.Better (IMHO (in my humble opinion)) to run an hourly service with destination arrivals from 08:15 and return hourly services through to 20:15. Run time 25 minutes longer, but over the years trim that back to 15 minutes longer as Network Rail extends electrification through as per their core route proposals.

I would far rather catch a regular train taking 15 minutes over the three hours running as and when I have finished business than to hang around from a 3 p.m. finish to a quarter past five train that takes 15 minutes under the 3 hours when it eventually leaves.

Looking towards the shifts that we are already seeing and suspect will remain to a greater or lesser degree, what should we see?  An hourly PAD-PLY express service with the five intermediate stops above. An hourly PAD-PGN regional service PAD-RDG-NBY» (Newbury - next trains) and nearly all stations, overtaken by the express at EXD.  No need to separate out the Bedwyn service any longer - London passengers from far Somerset and beyond won't be frustrated by the extra regional calls because they'll be on the express, and the days of the train manager walking along the train to slam doors at Hungerford and Kintbury followed by a s-l-o-w takeoff are gone. 

From a business user viewpoint, the express will/would be very much a "travelling office" as we have very much moved over recent years - not wasted time for the passenger, but a chance to work, eat, sleep, relax - better do those things in transit rather that do them in extra time before or after the journey.

For really long - all day - journeys, there might be sense / a market for occasional trains; that's once you move along from the sort of journeys where a day can be shared with other work and a day which is wholly taken by travel.  Hence my other threads looking at South West to Scotland.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7794



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 14, 2020, 09:12:25 »

......makes the case beautifully for the reopening of Plymouth Airport - fingers crossed, but not holding breath!
Logged
Jamsdad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 201


View Profile Email
« Reply #8 on: November 14, 2020, 11:38:47 »

There is a business case for providing a headline service of under 3 hours to Plymouth. A lot of work has gone on over any years by the business community and local government in Plymouth and in Cornwall who are acutely aware that the perception of Plymouth and Cornwall being too far away is a significant factor in attracting ( or not) business investment. A fast service of less than 3 hours is therefore important for attracting new business to Plymouth and Cornwall.
Logged
southwest
Guest
« Reply #9 on: November 20, 2020, 19:30:43 »

There is demand for it. Reading has trains to London every 5 minutes so won't affect them. Taunton Has a train every 30 mins. Tiverton, Exeter, Newton Abbot and Totnes already have one train an hour.  I'm sure GWR (Great Western Railway) could find a way for a non stop 5 car service from Paddington to Plymouth.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page