Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum [home] and [about]
from GWR - Travel with confidence
Forum in and beyond Coronavirus
DfT Covid Travel Advice
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 today - Railfuture Severnside - CANX
29/09/20 - Tuesday Club - ONLINE
03/10/20 - RailFuture Annual - ONLINE
09/10/20 - Travelwach Southwest
Random Image
Train Running Polls Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
September 26, 2020, 07:44:31 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[124] AZTEC Tickets - sorting out the ticket barriers
[109] Newhaven Marine. Closure consultation, January 2020.
[89] Journeys between places with similar names
[52] lack of rail scenes in modern day films
[49] Weymouth tramway-the final curtain?
[47] Older types of fluorescent lamp now hard to find.
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Local traffic - Bourne End to Marlow  (Read 493 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 30660



View Profile WWW Email
« on: August 08, 2020, 08:05:27 pm »

Is there actually any intermediate traffic that would use a train such as this ... or is this a positioning move to resynchronise?

Quote
19:34 Maidenhead to Marlow due 19:57 will be started from Bourne End.
It will no longer call at Maidenhead, Furze Platt and Cookham.
This is due to a points failure.

Which brings the question when two trains are running in the peak ... does the Marlow train wait for the arrival of the train from Maidenhead if it's late, or set off time come hell, high-water, or the sound of a 166 in the distance?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Adelante_CCT
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1303



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: August 09, 2020, 11:42:37 am »

This is because the 19:00 from Marlow terminated at Bourne End en route to Maidenhead. I am aware of numerous people who do/have walked Cookham/Bourne End/Marlow via the river and then return by train (or vice versa)

Haven't personally travelled the line in the peak for a while, but the Marlow train did certainly used to wait (presumably up to a defined number of minutes)
Logged
Electric train
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 3332


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: August 11, 2020, 08:44:51 am »

Is there actually any intermediate traffic that would use a train such as this ... or is this a positioning move to resynchronise?

Quote
19:34 Maidenhead to Marlow due 19:57 will be started from Bourne End.
It will no longer call at Maidenhead, Furze Platt and Cookham.
This is due to a points failure.

Which brings the question when two trains are running in the peak ... does the Marlow train wait for the arrival of the train from Maidenhead if it's late, or set off time come hell, high-water, or the sound of a 166 in the distance?

The 19:34 is a Saturday service, no peak services operate on a Saturday.   It may have been capped due to an operational issue at Maidenhead, Platform 5 is now effectively a second UP Relief, is used by TfL services as turn back and Sidings access
Logged

Neither a wise man nor a brave man lies down on the tracks of history to wait for the train of the future to run over him.     
Dwight D. Eisenhower
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8290



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: August 11, 2020, 10:01:22 am »

The issue was at Bourne End.  The crew were unable to switch the points on arrival from Marlow to get to Maidenhead, so the return trip from Maidenhead started from Bourne End.   Technicians were able to give the system a clean bill of health before the unit returned from Marlow a second time.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page