Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 12:15 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:21 Newbury to Bedwyn
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 12:26:15 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[124] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[49] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[48] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[43] Return of the BRUTE?
[30] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Night Sleeper - next generation  (Read 8471 times)
Reginald25
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: September 08, 2020, 20:10:37 »

I feel only a very small proportion of travellers from a line below the M4 (say) to Scotland, would travel by sleeper. Business travellers would be looking probably for a day return (only possible by plane, and cheaper) or travel up in the evening before, stay in a hotel (with showers and a good breakfast) and be ready to start meetings etc.

Not a sleeper service, but for comparison, a few years ago at work I looked at alternatives from Melksham to Durham. Renting a car to get me to Bristol airport and back, another to get me from Newcastle airport to the meeting, and a return airfare, worked out significantly cheaper than rental car/hotel or std train/hotel. The comparison would be worse for a sleeper as a single berth would necessitate first class.

For leisure travel, a late start back by sleeper would mean hanging around to get on the train (outbound perhaps easier if starting from home but that would need someone to provide a lift to the station). Generally not easy to period park at a station as woudl be the case for air travel.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: September 08, 2020, 21:11:30 »

A modern sleeper train should be able to provide showers and a decent breakfast.
Showers don't use that much water, and IMHO (in my humble opinion) used shower water could be dumped, unlike toilet waste.
Alternatively, used shower water could be used to flush the WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority)), thereby reducing the total tank capacity required.

And as for breakfast, the present mood on the railway is against catering, but that might change.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
southwest
Guest
« Reply #32 on: September 11, 2020, 13:55:41 »

A modern sleeper train should be able to provide showers and a decent breakfast.
Showers don't use that much water, and IMHO (in my humble opinion) used shower water could be dumped, unlike toilet waste.
Alternatively, used shower water could be used to flush the WC (Wiltshire Council (Unitary Authority)), thereby reducing the total tank capacity required.

And as for breakfast, the present mood on the railway is against catering, but that might change.

I fully agree with you, If an A380 can have a shower on board I don't see why a modern sleep can't.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: September 11, 2020, 14:18:45 »

Of course the MK (Milton Keynes) V's used on the Caledonian Sleeper cars do have showers, and I'm sure any replacement to the not-very-modern-any-more MK III's will have them installed, but probably not cost effective to adapt them now.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: September 11, 2020, 21:08:57 »

The only way that I can see to re use much of the exiting stock AND provide showers would to build a small number of new vehicles with four showers, two at each end.
Place these new vehicles between two existing sleepers such that each berth is near a shower. Use the rest of the space in this coach to provide a few luxury first class cabins with en-suite showers.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
southwest
Guest
« Reply #35 on: September 12, 2020, 11:20:30 »

The only way that I can see to re use much of the exiting stock AND provide showers would to build a small number of new vehicles with four showers, two at each end.
Place these new vehicles between two existing sleepers such that each berth is near a shower. Use the rest of the space in this coach to provide a few luxury first class cabins with en-suite showers.

Why bother though? I can't think of any train company buying 4 new Mark 5 just have showers on board it's not financially viable.
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: September 12, 2020, 12:39:06 »

The only way that I can see to re use much of the exiting stock AND provide showers would to build a small number of new vehicles with four showers, two at each end.
Place these new vehicles between two existing sleepers such that each berth is near a shower. Use the rest of the space in this coach to provide a few luxury first class cabins with en-suite showers.

Why bother though? I can't think of any train company buying 4 new Mark 5 just have showers on board it's not financially viable.

Yes either you have entirely new sleeper stock or you stay as you are.  I don't see logic for mix and match.  Of course new locos to improve reliability would be useful and if it decreases maintenance might stack up from a financial point of view as well. 
Logged
Jamsdad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 201


View Profile Email
« Reply #37 on: September 14, 2020, 13:01:09 »

I don't think there would be much demand from Night Riviera passengers. You can already get a shower at Paddington.
Logged
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 877


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: September 14, 2020, 17:17:55 »

I don't think there would be much demand from Night Riviera passengers. You can already get a shower at Paddington.

..and Truro & Penzance (in normal times)
Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: September 14, 2020, 21:17:49 »

The only way that I can see to re use much of the exiting stock AND provide showers would to build a small number of new vehicles with four showers, two at each end.
Place these new vehicles between two existing sleepers such that each berth is near a shower. Use the rest of the space in this coach to provide a few luxury first class cabins with en-suite showers.

Why bother though? I can't think of any train company buying 4 new Mark 5 just have showers on board it's not financially viable.


Yes either you have entirely new sleeper stock or you stay as you are.  I don't see logic for mix and match.  Of course new locos to improve reliability would be useful and if it decreases maintenance might stack up from a financial point of view as well. 

I partly agree, the only merit of my suggestion was reduced capital cost if compared to an all new fleet.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
southwest
Guest
« Reply #40 on: September 15, 2020, 19:14:25 »

The only way that I can see to re use much of the exiting stock AND provide showers would to build a small number of new vehicles with four showers, two at each end.
Place these new vehicles between two existing sleepers such that each berth is near a shower. Use the rest of the space in this coach to provide a few luxury first class cabins with en-suite showers.

Why bother though? I can't think of any train company buying 4 new Mark 5 just have showers on board it's not financially viable.


Yes either you have entirely new sleeper stock or you stay as you are.  I don't see logic for mix and match.  Of course new locos to improve reliability would be useful and if it decreases maintenance might stack up from a financial point of view as well. 

I partly agree, the only merit of my suggestion was reduced capital cost if compared to an all new fleet.

Having an all new fleet would be cheaper overall, easier maintenance, halving the required spare parts etc. The Mk3s are good but their age is begining to show, even the Castle sets won't last more than 10-12 years. Besides do we really want late 1970s/early 80s rolling stock still in mainline service in 2032?
Logged
Reginald25
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 301


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: September 17, 2020, 14:52:40 »

I agree that showers etc are probably better at terminal stations. But there is no substitute for an ensuite hotel room available all evening. I can't see sleepers attracting more than a small percentage of the traffic on a core route, the alternative of evening flight (or daytime train) with a hotel at the end, is so much easier and probably cheaper. There are of course non-drivers who don't like flying who might prefer the sleeper.
Logged
Jamsdad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 201


View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: September 17, 2020, 16:12:06 »

Im sorry I don't agree with you. Demand for the Night Riviera is high. Often you cant get a berth. Cornish people with business in London find it a much cheaper alternative than either peak early morning trains or going up the night before and spending ?100 plus on a London hotel room. Business demand is high too. Cornwall and Isles of Scilly Local Enterprise Partnership have invested heavily in the sleeper  revamp and in new lounges and have done this because it is what businesses want. A few years ago when FGW (First Great Western) suggested scrapping the sleeper there was a huge response in favour of keeping it.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page