Train Graphic
Great Western Passengers' Forum [home] and [about]
Current travel advice 5.1.2021
Forum in and beyond Coronavirus
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 03:15 27 Jan 2021
- What it's like cooped up in 'Hotel Quarantine'
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 29/01/21 - FOSBR AGM - ONLINE
29/01/21 - TWSW- Town Centres
02/02/21 - Torre Signal Box Auction
04/02/21 - MKM hub volunteer mtg - ONLINE
Random Image
Train Running Polls Acronyms/Abbreviations Station Comparator Rail news GWR co. site Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
January 27, 2021, 03:17:52 am *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most liked recent subjects
[79] Engineering work to close St Ives branch Jan to Feb 2021
[73] G7 Summit - Cornwall - June 2021
[70] Sorting out unsavoury characters
[56] Presidential Rail Travel
[49] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[41] Deutschland Takt
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: 10 Reasons that rail investment should continue  (Read 266 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 32207



View Profile WWW Email
« on: November 25, 2020, 10:42:24 am »

From Politics Home - a clearly set out list of reasons why rail investment should continue with the long-term importance of the rail network

Quote
The Railway Industry Association (RIA), the trade body for the UK rail supply community, has called for the
Government to consider the long-term importance of the rail network, publishing 10 reasons why rail investment should continue, ahead of the Spending Review and in light of the debate over Coronavirus?s impact on the future of transport.

The ten reasons are as follows:

1. Rail is a long-term game ? Investments in infrastructure or rolling stock are usually delivered, and create continuing value for passengers and the wider economy, over years.

2. The reduction in passenger numbers is likely to be temporary ? Based on previous economic slumps in the 1980s, 1990s and post-2008, as well as past health crises, passenger numbers have always recovered to continue their pattern of growth.

3. Rail is not just for passengers ? It is also vital for freight, with over 4 billion tonnes being delivered annually before Coronavirus.

4. Rail travel is clean and safe ? A study undertaken by RSSB in August 2020 estimates that the risk of infection per passenger journey is 1-in-11,000 journeys, with similar results found in other countries.

5. Investment can support the whole of the UK ? The rail network touches almost every part of the country and has the potential to unlock a new generation of talent.

6. Rail can lead the green recovery ? It is not possible to meet zero carbon goals for transport without rail. Rail is a green mode of mass transit, contributing just 2.5% of greenhouse gas emissions from transport and only 0.6% of total UK emissions.

7. Rail cannot easily be mothballed - Once rail infrastructure is decommissioned, it is not easily reopened.

8. Rail investment has a knock-on economic impact - For every #1 spent on the rail network, #2.20 value is delivered in the wider economy.

9. Investment cannot wait ? Much of the rail spending planned cannot be postponed, in order to meet our decarbonisation and digitalisation targets.

10. There is a clear window to get work done ? The pandemic has provided an opportunity to get work done with less impact on services, which should be capitalised on before passenger and freight numbers return.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Bob_Blakey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 505


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2020, 01:57:42 pm »

11. As posted elsewhere 19 million UK citizens - and lets not ignore a significant number of visitors from overseas - cannot, or choose not to, use a car and rail is quite frequently the obvious alternative.

And I would suggest that once the economic & environmental disadvantages of electric cars become more 'mainstream' the 19m will increase.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5496


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2020, 05:50:44 pm »

I'm not sure point 2 really applies in this case, none of the previous scenarios quoted are remotely comparable and uniquely on this occasion the possibilities of remote working have been realised and are likely to persist as people appreciate the favourable work/life balance and employers appreciate the colossal savings they can make in office accommodation and other expenses.

Otherwise some reasonable points, but they really all pivot around future demand........just because you build it, doesn't mean they will come I'm afraid.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3591



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2020, 06:17:02 pm »

I am in general in favour of rail spending, for the reasons given in the O/P.
The point that I would add, is that IMO preference should be given to use of British made materials and employment of British workers.

Unemployment is likely to worsen, and spending public money within the UK economy helps both directly and indirectly.
Foreign made goods might be unavoidable in some circumstances, but preference should be given to UK suppliers unless there is a significant reason to do otherwise.

The UK is "greener" than many of our competitors, and this advantage is diluted by purchasing supplies from many overseas suppliers.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page