|
|
|
patch38
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 26, 2020, 03:00:56 pm » |
|
3 looks like Kemble but with the original Cirencester and Tetbury branches in-situ.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #2 on: November 26, 2020, 03:06:51 pm » |
|
3 looks like Kemble but with the original Cirencester and Tetbury branches in-situ.
Yes - the thin black lines are "disused", "abandoned" and "razed" in the database; other railway features are thickened. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
|
|
|
|
Richard Fairhurst
|
|
« Reply #3 on: November 26, 2020, 04:01:10 pm » |
|
I like this. Could name a few of them but for my "one each at first" it does, of course, have to be 6 - Charlbury.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #4 on: November 26, 2020, 04:04:44 pm » |
|
I like this. Could name a few of them but for my "one each at first" it does, of course, have to be 6 - Charlbury.
It IS fun, isn't it! Yes - Charlbury. Setting them up, I am learning a lot about places! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
|
|
|
|
Hafren
|
|
« Reply #5 on: November 26, 2020, 04:09:47 pm » |
|
7 looks like Whitland
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
TonyN
|
|
« Reply #6 on: November 26, 2020, 05:06:05 pm » |
|
No 1 Marlow
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AMLAG
|
|
« Reply #7 on: November 26, 2020, 05:10:10 pm » |
|
4 = Lympstone Commando
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
eXPassenger
|
|
« Reply #8 on: November 26, 2020, 05:53:22 pm » |
|
No 2 - Paddington.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #9 on: November 26, 2020, 06:03:52 pm » |
|
All right ... there's no doubt with a map, is there!
I will paste in correct answers and links in initial post
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
|
|
|
|
stuving
|
|
« Reply #10 on: November 26, 2020, 06:10:01 pm » |
|
No. 8 would be Melksham - mandatory if there's no Taunton?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Western Pathfinder
|
|
« Reply #11 on: November 26, 2020, 07:06:59 pm » |
|
WOT.no Pilning!...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
eightonedee
|
|
« Reply #12 on: November 26, 2020, 10:23:35 pm » |
|
I think 9 is Havant - presumably gets trains that go on to Brighton?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
grahame
|
|
« Reply #13 on: November 26, 2020, 11:23:43 pm » |
|
I think 9 is Havant - presumably gets trains that go on to Brighton?
Yes ... Havant and Melksham; just numbers 5 and 10 remaining. I find these maps fascinating - from seeing the lay of the land and catchments around stations to the tracks of old lines and the conversion to a cycle way like in Havant to where the underground runs under Paddington. Very tempted to go have a look-see in some places that look interesting on the map when that's allowed once again. Much easier to put together than a "spot the difference" too! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
