Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
End of through trains
Bristol to Waterloo?

 
Please sign our petition
(more information)
 
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 20:35 15 Oct 2021
- Covid: US to lift travel ban for fully jabbed on 8 November
- New travel rules: What tests do I need and where is on the red list?
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 tomorrow - Coffee Shop AGM - Didcot
17/10/21 - Wiltshire Climate Consultation
20/10/21 - SWR / Trowbridge meeting
27/10/21 - Railfuture on Cirencester
Random Image
Train RunningCancelled
17:04 London Paddington to Penzance
19:28 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:03 Paignton to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
19:41 Falmouth Docks to Par
20:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
Delayed
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
17:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
18:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
18:18 London Paddington to Swansea
18:32 Plymouth to Penzance
19:24 Exmouth to Paignton
21:48 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 15, 2021, 08:43:39 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[150] 648Y
[79] Staff reductions - London Area
[57] Porkway Partway
[57] Where were PhilWakely and bignosemac yesterday, 13th October 2...
[23] Former BR WR Chief Mechanical & Electrical Engineer - RIP
[22] "No tickets available" - Melksham to Didcot
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
Author Topic: Heathrow Express 332s  (Read 4467 times)
paul7755
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4925


View Profile
« on: December 08, 2020, 02:10:17 pm »

Seems to be hard to track down previous stuff about this, (the upcoming operation of HEx by GWR (Great Western Railway) 387s is covered in the TfL» (Transport for London - about) section Huh for some strange reason), but this morning saw two 332 units hauled to Sims at Newport for scrap.  Another was taken by road to be scrapped a few weeks ago.

I?d anticipate they?ll all be gone by Christmas.

Paul
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 34609



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2020, 02:23:23 pm »

Seems to be hard to track down previous stuff about this, (the upcoming operation of HEx by GWR (Great Western Railway) 387s is covered in the TfL» (Transport for London - about) section Huh for some strange reason), but this morning saw two 332 units hauled to Sims at Newport for scrap.  Another was taken by road to be scrapped a few weeks ago.

I?d anticipate they?ll all be gone by Christmas.

Paul

Noting the potential need for a thread move. Hands full at the moment but will take a look afterwards.

Going wider, noting pictures of class 153 units (? carriages) in "long term store" in Burton-on-Trent; reminds me off where we started with 153s in store at Eastleigh while there was a cry for more services in certain places.   
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8876


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2020, 02:29:46 pm »

I think they're keeping a few until early next year to allow for any cock-ups during the transition phase, but training and testing of the 387s is largely complete I believe.  Complete enough to run a full service at least.

Obviously a young age to send a train for scrap at just over 20 years, especially an EMU (Electric Multiple Unit), but they are in a pretty knackered state. 
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1162



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2020, 03:41:50 pm »

Parts are being recovered for use in the similar west Yorkshire units
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5837


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2020, 05:37:16 pm »

Seems to be hard to track down previous stuff about this, (the upcoming operation of HEx by GWR (Great Western Railway) 387s is covered in the TfL» (Transport for London - about) section Huh for some strange reason), but this morning saw two 332 units hauled to Sims at Newport for scrap.  Another was taken by road to be scrapped a few weeks ago.

I?d anticipate they?ll all be gone by Christmas.

Paul

Noting the potential need for a thread move. Hands full at the moment but will take a look afterwards.

The other board was renamed less than to years ago  see http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=21106.0. Grahame's rationale was:
Quote
As of 24th February (2019 for anyone finding this is the archive), some Coffee Shop boards have been re-arranged.  This board which was formerly Heathrow Express, Connect etc has been widened to cover any and all Transport for London services ... bearing in mind just how many of our members connect onwards to TfL services, and how TfL services are coming onto the lines out from Paddington too.   Heathrow services which are moving or have moved to GWR will be rehomed under Thames Valley Branches

So should it have been transport in London, rather than Transport For London? Heathrow is at least in Greater London ...
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1106



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2020, 06:56:32 pm »

It does seem a little daft bearing in mind that a lot of money is being spent on the considerably 319s turning them (very slowly!) into 769s.

I have no doubt there is a practical reason why they could not have been converted, or indeed why someone could not add ancillary diesel engines to 387s to fill the same need. I'll let those who understand these things explain!
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5837


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2020, 07:00:25 pm »

It does seem a little daft bearing in mind that a lot of money is being spent on the considerably 319s turning them (very slowly!) into 769s.

I have no doubt there is a practical reason why they could not have been converted, or indeed why someone could not add ancillary diesel engines to 387s to fill the same need. I'll let those who understand these things explain!

Perhaps the main reason is that there are too few of them (14), with too little in common with other fleets to make them a good prospect for maintenance.
Logged
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 433


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2020, 08:06:48 pm »

It does seem a little daft bearing in mind that a lot of money is being spent on the considerably 319s turning them (very slowly!) into 769s.

I have no doubt there is a practical reason why they could not have been converted, or indeed why someone could not add ancillary diesel engines to 387s to fill the same need. I'll let those who understand these things explain!

Perhaps the main reason is that there are too few of them (14), with too little in common with other fleets to make them a good prospect for maintenance.
Also they are only equipped with the Western's version of ATP (Automatic Train Protection). If they were to be used anywhere else then that would have to be stripped out and replaced by AWS (Automatic Warning System)/TPWS (Train Protection and Warning System). For only 14 units would that be worth it?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3624


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2020, 08:10:55 pm »

It does seem a little daft bearing in mind that a lot of money is being spent on the considerably 319s turning them (very slowly!) into 769s.

I have no doubt there is a practical reason why they could not have been converted, or indeed why someone could not add ancillary diesel engines to 387s to fill the same need. I'll let those who understand these things explain!

Perhaps the main reason is that there are too few of them (14), with too little in common with other fleets to make them a good prospect for maintenance.

The units have had problems with the bogies, the body shells are quite badly corroded.  At 20 years old hey would be due for a half life overhaul about now which BAA perhaps do not wish to fund, also the depot at OOC (Old Oak Common (depot)) has to go to make way for HS2 (The next High Speed line(s)) which BAA would have to part fund the build of a new depot plus all the route clearance involved.  Whereas the 387 operated by GWR (Great Western Railway) for BAA is a much more cost effective option
Logged

Neither a wise man nor a brave man lies down on the tracks of history to wait for the train of the future to run over him.     
Dwight D. Eisenhower
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8876


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2020, 08:13:02 pm »

Also they are only equipped with the Western's version of ATP (Automatic Train Protection). If they were to be used anywhere else then that would have to be stripped out and replaced by AWS (Automatic Warning System)/TPWS (Train Protection and Warning System). For only 14 units would that be worth it?

Given the likelihood of many other EMUs (Electric Multiple Unit) being surplus to requirements in the next couple of years that are younger, in better condition and more suitable, I think the answer is definitely no.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 34609



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #10 on: January 20, 2021, 12:39:32 pm »

Thread probably needs a rename / merge ...

From Breaking Travel News

Quote
Heathrow Express launches first fleet refresh in two decades

Heathrow Express has launched a newly refurbished fleet of 12 Class 387 trains, the first refresh since the service launched over 20 years ago.

In keeping with Heathrow Express? sustainability values, the fleet has been up-cycled from GWR (Great Western Railway), with upgraded interiors fitted out to a high and exacting standard.

The trains also have regenerative braking which mean trains slow by electric motor rather than brake shoes and discs.


Article continues ... on passenger facilities ...

Quote
Passengers will also have a more comfortable journey with more space for wheelchair users, double the number of toilets and a continuous gangway through the whole train.

Replacing the old Class 332s, the new fleet will provide Heathrow passengers with an unrivalled 15-minute journey with an even better and more reliable journey with plenty of space, luggage storage and fast on-board 4G enabled Wi-Fi, which will work continuously across Heathrow.

The modern interiors include USB plugs with every plug socket, making it easier for international passengers to charge devices while they travel.

Every carriage has more and improved TV screens showing live flight and rail connection updates, daily news highlights and shopping deals at Heathrow.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 8876


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: January 20, 2021, 01:31:58 pm »

And better acceleration and an extra 10mph top speed to help slightly with punctuality.

I still don't think Heathrow Express will be running for too long after the Elizabeth Line services start up, unless as part of the Western Rail Link to Heathrow...though that has gone a little quiet lately.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 113


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: January 20, 2021, 04:03:57 pm »

Hadn't realised HEx had on-board toilets. Certainly not needed on that length of journey but I suppose for their target market (some of whom will pay an extra tenner for First Class for a 15 minute journey on a train that's rarely crowded even in normal times) it probably helps to go on the move as it were having dashed to the train from a taxi, rather than wasting precious time using the facilities at either end!
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 3624


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2021, 04:10:44 pm »

And better acceleration and an extra 10mph top speed to help slightly with punctuality.

I still don't think Heathrow Express will be running for too long after the Elizabeth Line services start up, unless as part of the Western Rail Link to Heathrow...though that has gone a little quiet lately.

You could be right, although they may retain a semi fast service to Heathrow
Logged

Neither a wise man nor a brave man lies down on the tracks of history to wait for the train of the future to run over him.     
Dwight D. Eisenhower
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1353


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2021, 07:04:55 am »

Quote
Hadn't realised HEx had on-board toilets. Certainly not needed on that length of journey but I suppose for their target market (some of whom will pay an extra tenner for First Class for a 15 minute journey on a train that's rarely crowded even in normal times) it probably helps to go on the move as it were having dashed to the train from a taxi, rather than wasting precious time using the facilities at either end!

But no toilets on the Elizabeth Line, for a far longer journey. If you have dashed from the car park to the train on the commute (sorry should this be in the historical topic) it could be a long time to cross your legs before you can use the facilities at the other end.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1] 2
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page