Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 28 Mar 2024
- Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Jet2 launches first flight from Liverpool airport
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
13:28 Weymouth to Gloucester
15:10 Newquay to Par
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
15:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
16:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
16:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
Short Run
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 15:46:39 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Public opinion on buses  (Read 1241 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 12, 2020, 09:00:51 »

From This is Money, a financial report on Stagecoach - longish piece; so much to learn about "Joe Public"'s view in the comments.

Quote
Bus and coach operator Stagecoach saw its half-year profits plummet by 92 per cent to ?5.4million as demand for transport faltered during the pandemic.

The number of people using their cars rather than public transport is on the up, according to Stagecoach, who claimed that use of cars reached around 90 per cent of levels seen last year in October.

Stagecoach saw revenues nearly halve to ?454.6million in the six months to 31 October, against ?800.2million a year ago. The group said it had made around ?17million worth of cost savings in the last year.

Here are the comments - starting with those given the most thumbs ups

It's cheaper to drive than take the bus or coach.

Come 2030, only new electric cars will be sold. By 2040 only the rich will be driving and the rest of us will be stuck at home in virtual worlds. I wonder if public transport will exist by then, probably not

I'm not surprised. The bus fares here are ridiculous.

Not surprised I was on a bus just before the November lockdown, by the time it was half way through its journey the driver wouldnt let any more people on because of the restrictions

What's a bus? We don't have them in the countryside.

Being forced to wear a face nappy on public transport is hardly going to encourage people to take the bus or train. I'm not sure how this rule squares with Carrie's eco-loon agenda. By all means wear a mask if you're sick. It should not be inflicted on healthy people.

- and those given the most thumbs downs

Good. The smelly bloody things clog our roads and only serve city elites and c#@v$.

If Stagecoach were to ban dogs on buses then they might get more passengers. Notwithstanding the fact that dogs are a very effective vehicle for transmitting the coronavirus via their fur and the accessories they wear, so many people with respiratory problems have allergies to dogs or more accurately the dander that comes from a dog. Aside from guide dogs, dogs do not need to be on public transport.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: December 12, 2020, 09:42:34 »

Just to be clear, the comments are not part of the report - they are 'This is Money' readers' reactions to it.

While it would be wrong to dismiss them out of hand, I do wonder how representative they are. The bottom half of the internet is a murky place.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Robin Summerhill
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1145


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: December 12, 2020, 09:54:11 »

The bottom half of the internet is a murky place.

Some of the top half isnt much to write home about either...

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: December 12, 2020, 10:16:22 »

Just to be clear, the comments are not part of the report - they are 'This is Money' readers' reactions to it.

While it would be wrong to dismiss them out of hand, I do wonder how representative they are. The bottom half of the internet is a murky place.

Thanks for that further clarification - yes, put views written by a self-sampling mix of people with very mixed background, knowledge, and in some cases abilities to apply logic.  You ask "how representative" and there the thumbs ups and downs to give us a clue as to whether other share the view or feel the commenters have it wrong. Still not a scientific analysis, but an indication of sentiment perhaps.

"Cheaper to drive" has 72 people clicking to support, and 10 people clicking to mark it down
"What's a bus in the countryside" has 46 people clicking to support, and just 3 people clicking to mark it down
"Facemask puts me off" [paraphrased] has 59 people clicking to support, and 12 people clicking to mark it down

and addressing that sentiment might - just might - provide an indicator of why some people aren't keen on using the buses.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 12, 2020, 10:45:17 »

Just to be clear, the comments are not part of the report - they are 'This is Money' readers' reactions to it.

While it would be wrong to dismiss them out of hand, I do wonder how representative they are. The bottom half of the internet is a murky place.

Not sure what you mean by the "bottom half of the internet" in this context?

I suspect that the respondents are mainly people bothered/affected enough to comment? At least that's what they sound like.

I very much doubt that people who never need/want to travel by bus would take the time to read the article, much less comment on it, it's a pretty niche subject, so you're likely to have a similarly niche cohort of responses.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2020, 10:48:13 »

Mail Online - of which This is Money is part of - is read by....well, go read some of the comments in other 'news' items on there & you'll understand, I guess.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2020, 16:40:53 »

Christopher Hitchens once upbraided someone with words to the effect of: 'You give me the impression that you've never tried listening to anyone who doesn't agree with you'.

We shouldn't dismiss anyone's view out of hand, and in these times we live in it is more important than ever to try to understand why people disagree with us. We have more in common than that which divides us. But I struggle with the bottom half of the internet - by which I mean the 'comments' section we often see below news stories. There are real people who spend much of their day reacting to news stories in this way. But there are also sockpuppets, trolls and bots who devalue the efforts of those who use this medium to try to express real opinions.

The beauty of this forum is that, thanks almost entirely to grahame's tireless efforts, we have a civilised space where real people express real opinions. I'm not at all sure the same could be said of the comments section of publications in the DMG Media or Local World stables.



Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7743



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2020, 17:58:54 »

Christopher Hitchens once upbraided someone with words to the effect of: 'You give me the impression that you've never tried listening to anyone who doesn't agree with you'.

We shouldn't dismiss anyone's view out of hand, and in these times we live in it is more important than ever to try to understand why people disagree with us. We have more in common than that which divides us. But I struggle with the bottom half of the internet - by which I mean the 'comments' section we often see below news stories. There are real people who spend much of their day reacting to news stories in this way. But there are also sockpuppets, trolls and bots who devalue the efforts of those who use this medium to try to express real opinions.

The beauty of this forum is that, thanks almost entirely to grahame's tireless efforts, we have a civilised space where real people express real opinions. I'm not at all sure the same could be said of the comments section of publications in the DMG Media or Local World stables.





Up to a point you're right, especially re: Graham, but I do find the standard issue sneer at the Mail and by implication its readers a little tiresome - it's often to be found within this esteemed forum and comes across as a default cop out and a bit lazy to be honest (and no, I'm not a Mail reader)

Just my (real) opinion  Wink


Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 12, 2020, 21:32:11 »

Christopher Hitchens once upbraided someone with words to the effect of: 'You give me the impression that you've never tried listening to anyone who doesn't agree with you'.

We shouldn't dismiss anyone's view out of hand, and in these times we live in it is more important than ever to try to understand why people disagree with us. We have more in common than that which divides us. But I struggle with the bottom half of the internet - by which I mean the 'comments' section we often see below news stories. There are real people who spend much of their day reacting to news stories in this way. But there are also sockpuppets, trolls and bots who devalue the efforts of those who use this medium to try to express real opinions.

The beauty of this forum is that, thanks almost entirely to grahame's tireless efforts, we have a civilised space where real people express real opinions. I'm not at all sure the same could be said of the comments section of publications in the DMG Media or Local World stables.
Up to a point you're right, especially re: Graham, but I do find the standard issue sneer at the Mail and by implication its readers a little tiresome - it's often to be found within this esteemed forum and comes across as a default cop out and a bit lazy to be honest (and no, I'm not a Mail reader)

I don't have a problem with the opinions expressed in the Mail and other so called Newspapers. It is when they misrepresent the facts that I have a problem. I once knew a labour voter who read the Telegraph for the sport and the fact that (at the time) it clearly separated the news from the opinions meant he could ignore the opinions. There was once a Brussels Correspondent of a paper who made up stories about the European Commission. That was misrepresenting the facts! Whatever happened to him?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2020, 11:19:48 »

... but I do find the standard issue sneer at the Mail and by implication its readers a little tiresome - it's often to be found within this esteemed forum and comes across as a default cop out and a bit lazy to be honest (and no, I'm not a Mail reader)

Just my (real) opinion  Wink

Noting "just my opinion" - thank you for adding that.

If talking about and promoting (in this instance) travel by bus, your most valued inputs should be bus users, wannabe bus users, and potential bus users.  A further important set of groups are the bus providers, the road and city planners, those with wider direct interests such as noise, congestion, pollution, businesses served by the buses, and so on.  This group goes wider as you look at just how much society is linked - the taxpayer who's concerned about how much he as a car driver is subsidising the local bus (38 pounds per person per annum but that INCLUDES senior bus passes which make up just under half of the amount).  Less valued input - but still listened to - is the group that doesn't and can't envisage using the buses but enjoys reading and commenting, with comments tending towards the destructive (and easy to write with little data) rather than the constructive. And it's much easier for such inputs to be made as a quick comment - with the cloak of an alias and the assurance of no responsibility for the effect thereof - to be made on news stories.    I don't see any "standard issue sneer" and none of us (I have spoken with other moderators) intend to do such ... but I have and will give more credence to people who use the buses, ask about using them, suggest how they can be better, than those who "wouldn't be seen dead" on a bus.   The very fact that I quoted these people at the start or the thread and others are all discussing them rather give lie to laziness  Cheesy


Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2020, 14:13:36 »


I once knew a labour voter who read the Telegraph for the sport and the fact that (at the time) it clearly separated the news from the opinions meant he could ignore the opinions. There was once a Brussels Correspondent of a paper who made up stories about the European Commission. That was misrepresenting the facts! Whatever happened to him?


Now ... just remind me ... which newspaper was this gentleman working for at that time ?     I do hope it was one that "clearly separated the news from the opinions"  Wink Wink
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page