Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 23:35 28 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1917)
Bideford, Westward Ho! and Appledore closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
21:45 Penzance to London Paddington
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 23:54:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[98] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[97] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[86] Return of the BRUTE?
[74] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[23] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
Author Topic: Trams for Bristol (again) and Bath?  (Read 8586 times)
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #45 on: March 17, 2021, 18:27:53 »

Only two days later, and it's been value-engineered down to a few extra bus routes already. With bendy buses. Bristol 24/7 reports:

No, TonyK.

The plans as outlined in recent meetings make it clear that a mass transit system, which may be rail-based and may be underground, will take 10 to 15 years to deliver. The rapid transit system (essentially more MetroBus) can be rolled out more quickly. The article you've quoted is talking about the latter, which you will note it refers to as the first phase.

Adam Crowther doesn't help when he refers to this phase as 'mass transit', though; but everyone else finds WECA» (West of England Combined Authority - about)'s terminology confusing so why shouldn't he?

Note Crowther's parting shot:

Quote
He said the eventual mass transit system would be overlaid on the rapid bus network.

Ah, sorry, I jumped the gun. Maybe next year, then.
Logged

Now, please!
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: December 06, 2021, 12:10:29 »

More news on the form the mythical Mass Transit Network will take has slipped out in a survey for the redevelopment of Mead Street. Page 2 of the survey shows:

Quote
Guiding principle 2 - Providing better routes for sustainable travel

Prioritising sustainable modes of transport is a key principle.

One option is to create an active travel route via Mead Street, providing a segregated pedestrian and cycle way along its length. This would provide links from Mead Street to Bath Road to enable a convenient link to the proposed new southern access to Temple Meads Station (Southern Gateway) and connect through to an active travel route being considered at Whitehouse Street.

A Mass Transit Network is being considered for Bristol which would provide regular electric, or hydrogen powered bus services via dedicated routes, offering a convenient and sustainable mode of transport across the city.  The network of mass transit routes is not yet determined, but there is a desire that the network serves the proposed Southern Gateway to Temple Meads Station. Given Mead Street’s proximity to the proposed Southern Gateway, this could be a possible route. Before any decisions are made in relation to the Mass Transit proposals community engagement will take place.[/b]


My emphasis. We are getting Son of MetroBust, folks, to build on the massive success of the first tranche. Pre-pandemic and before the guided bit had to be closed, MetroBust was hailed as a big success as passenger numbers had exceeded expectations. Total bus travel was, however, down on the previous year, reversing a steady upward trend. My own pet theory, based on anecdotal evidence, is that MetroBust proved great for the people at the ends, but not along the route. A case in point was in Stapleton, where some local services were withdrawn when the M3 to Keith Emersons Green was introduced. Friends of mine reported walking to the stop in the middle of nowhere, only for buses full of happy escapees from Lyde Green sail gracefully by without stopping. With little alternative, and none at all from the MetroBust stop, some who had commuted by bus for years started going to work by car again.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2021, 13:17:20 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Now, please!
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #47 on: December 06, 2021, 12:34:34 »

A case in point was in Stapleton, where some local services were withdrawn when the M3 to Keith Emersons Green was introduced.

Does it have a bus fare for the common man?
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #48 on: December 06, 2021, 13:27:30 »


We are getting Son of MetroBust, folks...


'The beginning of wisdom,' according to Confucious, 'is to call things by their proper name'. Bristol City Council defined MetroBus-style buses as 'rapid transit', and the thing that sits between these and trains as 'mass transit'. Subsequently they have used the terms interchangeably, which is reasonable in that everyone else already did but confusing for anyone who assumed they were adhering to their own definitions.

So who knows what they mean?
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #49 on: December 06, 2021, 15:40:59 »

I don't recall that we did Confucianism at school, although I didn't think we did history, and apparently we did. That explains some of the bruises. I do recall though that Humpty Dumpty said "Words mean what I want them to mean", so I assume that's the way it is done at City Hall.

Bus Rapid Transit started as a solution to the problem of unreliable long bus routes passing through the Centre, and a way to cut emissions. It consisted of a long bus route passing through the centre, two shorter routes starting in the Centre, a couple of new car roads with bus lanes painted on them, and an express route to the airport along a crumbling riverside. For some reason, it didn't entirely captivate the public imagination. BRT (Bus Rapid Transit) became a byword for a lack of imagination, flawed thinking and massive overspending. This needed firm and resolute action, so the name was changed to Metrobust. This radical leap forward didn't cause so much as the slightest ripple of interest amongst bus operators. The original plan envisaged vicious competition between rival operators, with fist-fights breaking out between managers keen to secure the right to pay access charges to run services over the infrastructure, charging a premium fare to pay for it. The reality turned out to be exactly what the rest of us predicted, with First the only operator, no access fees, and day fares slightly cheaper than "normal" buses (ie, the ones without a "M" before the number).

The motive power doesn't really change whether it is mass transit or not. From the time the trams ended until the 1980s, Bristol enjoyed what it didn't realise was a golden age of buses. There were more then than there are now, they just realise it was mass transit. It doesn't much matter what the name is - if it has wheels and looks like a bus, it's a bus.
« Last Edit: December 06, 2021, 19:55:02 by TonyK » Logged

Now, please!
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 514


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: December 06, 2021, 16:19:30 »

Drifting off-topic, but looking at the consultation on Bristol's no 2. bus, it seems (as with MetroBus) largely an excuse to use public transport money for pet highway projects and making car use as difficult as possible. the irony is of course that when people do use cars, they will have to travel three times as far because of all the one-way systems. Hey ho!     
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: December 06, 2021, 16:45:00 »

Drifting off-topic, but looking at the consultation on Bristol's no 2. bus, it seems (as with MetroBus) largely an excuse to use public transport money for pet highway projects and making car use as difficult as possible. the irony is of course that when people do use cars, they will have to travel three times as far because of all the one-way systems. Hey ho!     

The original MetroBus was at least in part a road-building scheme paid for with public transport money. Rather than making car user 'as difficult as possible', it actually made it rather easier. Kudos to the clever blighter who thought up removing the word 'Road' from the South Bristol Link though!

Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #52 on: December 06, 2021, 17:17:11 »

Drifting off-topic, but looking at the consultation on Bristol's no 2. bus, it seems (as with MetroBus) largely an excuse to use public transport money for pet highway projects and making car use as difficult as possible. the irony is of course that when people do use cars, they will have to travel three times as far because of all the one-way systems. Hey ho!     

The original MetroBus was at least in part a road-building scheme paid for with public transport money. Rather than making car user 'as difficult as possible', it actually made it rather easier. Kudos to the clever blighter who thought up removing the word 'Road' from the South Bristol Link though!



I have had a look into this, and as a result, I am naming the "clever blighter" in question as Alistair Rice of the North Somerset Council Directorate: Development and Environment Policy Team. It was his January 2010 report here that made the decision to choose the "Red Route" described in the report as "South Bristol Link", over the "Blue Route" described in the report as "A38/A370 Link Road".

I therefore judge that it was at this point that the terminology definitively changed to "South Bristol Link".
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
DaveHarries
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 259



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: December 16, 2021, 23:46:01 »

Quote
Before any decisions are made in relation to the Mass Transit proposals community engagement will take place.
Yeah sure. Roll Eyes Hope they include those such as I who work in the Temple Meads area: it might be a good idea.

As for the consultation on the no.2 bus route I have taken part in this and said, among other things, that:

- the 24hr bus lanes are a daft idea because not only does the no.2 route not operate 24/7 (although I am aware that the 76 is a 24/7 serve through Brentry and Southmead) but you also don't get huge tailbacks on the route after about 7:00/7:30pm. There are enough empty business units on Whiteladies Road already and I think that businesses along there will find it a case of survival of the fittest if these 24hr bus lanes get put in. IMO (in my opinion) bus lanes running at peak times only (say Monday to Friday, 6:30 to 9am inbound and 4pm - 6:30pm outbound) on Whiteladies Road would be better and would not adversely affect trade for the small businesses, especially given the times we are in during which the businesses on Whiteladies Road and elsewhere need all the customers they can get.

- the Roman Road closure on the Downs is a dumb idea because the buses on the number 4 (the 2/2A do not serve that road) will get caught in the congestion on Stoke Road at peak hours with no way out of it.

The 4 is my local route but it does not operate frequently enough to make me use it. And as far as the continuous cycleway idea is concerned my only reply to that is an age-old saying: "you can lead horses to water but you can't make 'em drink it."

Dave
« Last Edit: December 17, 2021, 00:05:22 by DaveHarries » Logged
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1528



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: December 17, 2021, 07:42:31 »

Well said Dave wholeheartedly agree with you on this.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 3 [4]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page