Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
No recent travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 19 Apr 2024
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
19th Apr (1938)
Foundation, Beatties of London (link)

Train RunningCancelled
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:18 London Paddington to Swansea
19:23 London Paddington to Oxford
21:02 Oxford to London Paddington
Short Run
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 19, 2024, 19:52:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[333] Rail to refuge / Travel to refuge
[69] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[53] Somerset and Dorset Devonshire Tunnel flood
[30] Difficult to argue with e-bike/scooter rules?
[28] Signage - not making it easy ...
[6] IETs at Melksham
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Rolling stock changes  (Read 1875 times)
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« on: March 31, 2021, 17:02:52 »

Apparently it’s been announced by SWR» (South Western Railway - about) internally today that the 442s are out, and the 458/5s will be re-converted back to 4 car 100 mph units, to be based at Bournemouth.   I assume they’ll be operated as 12 car sets to give max capacity at 2+2 seating on the mainline routes.

They have stated the 442s will be scrapped, although I suppose
 the rumour mill might have other ideas...

Paul

Logged
MVR S&T
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 438


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 31, 2021, 18:08:07 »

From Wikipedia:

SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Newsflash Changes to our fleet: Withdrawal of Class 442 The COVID-19 pandemic and the effect this has had on rail travel has forced us to rethink and adapt our fleet strategy. As a result, we have taken the hard decision to permanently withdraw our Class 442 trains which haven't been used since the start of the pandemic in March 2020 Prior to the pandemic, the Class 442s were seen as an important part of our strategy to meet the ever growing peak demand for our services. This is why we made the decision to refurbish them and modernise their traction and braking equipment. A great deal of work has been carried out by our skilled team at Bournemouth Depot and the wider Engineering and SWR team throughout the project and this news has, as you can imagine, come as a disappointment for the whole team involved There is positive news too that I am pleased to share with you that sets our fleet strategy and Bournemouth depot's forward plans in the medium-term, we have extended our lease with Porterbrook for the Class 458s, who will be converting them back to 4-car 100mph units whilst at the same time refurbishing them to make them suitable for our longer-distance journeys. This fleet will be based at Bournemouth depot, going towards protecting the workforce there. The Class 442 units will be retired from service and go through a process to remove useful spares and dispose of the vehicles. This is obviously an abrupt and unexpected end to the fleet, however, given the reduction in our customer numbers and expected future growth, we do have to take a realistic view of future demand and deliver the most efficient service we can for our customers and the taxpayer. Neil Drury Engineering Director
« Last Edit: March 31, 2021, 19:14:36 by MVR S&T » Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5408



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 31, 2021, 18:48:35 »

Another case in which years of rising passenger numbers have resulted in worsening crowding and more standing for longer distances.
Then a probably short term drop in numbers results in scrapping of rolling stock to reduce capacity.

Whenever serious or worsening crowding is complained about, the rail industry mantra is that "there is no spare rolling stock"
Or in more detail
"We can not justify obtaining extra rolling stock for exceptional event like Christmas, bank holidays, major sporting events, Easter, school holidays, beginings/ends of university terms, and other rare events"

When there is any risk of being able to cope with peak flows, then stock must be scrapped in order to return to the default position of "there is no spare rolling stock"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10116


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 31, 2021, 19:33:36 »

SWR» (South Western Railway - about) more than most operators have lots of rolling stock that is (or was) purely used to cope with commuting demand twice a day. 

I can’t foresee SWR’s passenger numbers recovering to anything like what is was before the pandemic because of that.

Many off-peak SWR trains had vast amounts of off-peak capacity before the pandemic.  If a fleet rationing maintains train lengths on the routes and times it is still needed then it is a sensible decision.

I foresee other operators with similar market bias towards commuting coming to the same conclusion and many older (and some newer) EMU (Electric Multiple Unit) fleets being retired early.
« Last Edit: March 31, 2021, 19:47:49 by IndustryInsider » Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 01, 2021, 13:24:30 »

Highly unlikely Angel Trains will find another customer for the 442s, despite the wild speculation across other rail forums as to how they could be used/converted for use elsewhere.

So, the piggies are most likely off to the abattoir. Where only the choicest cuts will be trimmed from their cold dead carcasses.

Hopefully, one full set can be bought and preserved, with conversion back to original livery/internals. Who'd do so and where it would run (loco hauled obviously) are the big questions...

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40784



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #5 on: April 01, 2021, 13:38:42 »

Hopefully, one full set can be bought and preserved, with conversion back to original livery/internals. Who'd do so and where it would run (loco hauled obviously) are the big questions...

There seems to have been much speculation around heritage electrification this morning - South Devon, Wallingford, and Lynton to Lynmouth.  I suspect that latter has gradient too steep for a 442, and I also expect the idea won't go much further.

Many a true word written in jest - I still wonder at the case for a third rail heritage operation, such as running on the Bromley North branch on a Sunday.  So many people brought up with stock now replaced and would love a trip out on an Electro Pneumatic Brake (EPB) or a HAP to show their grandchildren what things were like in their youth.  Is there a park at Grove Park for them to enjoy?

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying acronym
« Last Edit: April 01, 2021, 22:54:58 by VickiS » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
rogerpatenall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 322



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 01, 2021, 13:53:22 »

There was a short period in BR (British Rail(ways)) history when the most influential member of the BRBoard was The Design Director. In my view, the only positive development of that period was the 442 fleet - I don't know how much input she had in it, but the resulting Wessex Electrics are, in my view, the best looking and, 5 Bel pullmans apart, the most comfortable electric units to have run our rails. Runner up was probably the Clacton electrics.

Sorry. Just showing my age.

(By the way, BNM, great that you are about again. For me, 11 months of shielding formally ended last night so I can at least realistically plan a trip, even if it remains in the future).
Logged
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 01, 2021, 13:54:42 »

... Lynton to Lynmouth.  I suspect that latter has gradient too steep for a 442, and I also expect the idea won't go much further.

You never know! The 442s managed the steep climb out of Weymouth quite well. As long as only one unit was in the area. Current draw was problematical when another train was nearby. Climb up to Lynton is only a little steeper isn't it?
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 01, 2021, 14:04:35 »

There was a short period in BR (British Rail(ways)) history when the most influential member of the BRBoard was The Design Director. In my view, the only positive development of that period was the 442 fleet - I don't know how much input she had in it, but the resulting Wessex Electrics are, in my view, the best looking and, 5 Bel pullmans apart, the most comfortable electric units to have run our rails. Runner up was probably the Clacton electrics.

Sorry. Just showing my age.

(By the way, BNM, great that you are about again. For me, 11 months of shielding formally ended last night so I can at least realistically plan a trip, even if it remains in the future).

Thanks rp. Things didn't go exactly to plan this morning. More on that elsewhere on the forum later.

I only ever took a handful of journeys on the Wessex Electrics. They were great units. The last BR stock to be built with compartments I believe. And that unique 'snug' area next to the buffet counter.

The last trip I took on one was when some moved to Southern to provide the Gatwick Express service, with some extensions to Brighton. I managed to bag an unrefurbished set on a trip during a 1st Class All Line Rover jolly. Got a compartment to myself for most of the journey from Victoria to Brighton. Sadly there was no buffet service, but the 'snug' area was still there. Happy memories.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 01, 2021, 15:36:09 »

I am serious when I say a 442 set should be preserved. The class is a world record holder after all.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Fourbee
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 672


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 01, 2021, 17:16:43 »

The last trip I took on one was when some moved to Southern to provide the Gatwick Express service, with some extensions to Brighton. I managed to bag an unrefurbished set on a trip during a 1st Class All Line Rover jolly. Got a compartment to myself for most of the journey from Victoria to Brighton. Sadly there was no buffet service, but the 'snug' area was still there. Happy memories.

It's looking like my last trip was one from Brighton to Gatwick, but alas I had a refurbished one.
Logged
TonyN
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 471



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 01, 2021, 17:37:46 »

I managed one last trip when they where running one diagram on the Portsmouth direct in August 2019. I walked along the Wey navigation from Guildford to Godalming and then caugt a 442 to Portsmouth harbour.

My train arriving at Godalming 20th August 2019
Logged
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1930


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2021, 10:18:34 »

My concern would be that the last time SWR» (South Western Railway - about) (or its ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about)) upgraded a set of trains; e.g. Reading-Waterloo conversion from four to five car all the bike spaces vanished.
Logged
didcotdean
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1424


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 03, 2021, 11:43:21 »

I am serious when I say a 442 set should be preserved. The class is a world record holder after all.
442 401 was identified by the Railway Heritage Designation Advisory Board for preservation a few years ago but a full set would be more fitting I agree.

I was living in Weymouth during the period when the 442 was introduced and a long drawn out affair it was, seeing that the Class 432s had to be sequentially retired in order to salvage the traction motors and electrical control gear to be recycled into the 442s. The initial operational difficulties particularly with the plug doors prolonged this process. I was on the last REP unit going into Weymouth which sounded its horn pretty much continuously from Upwey.

They shaved around 20 minutes off the journey time to London, although this has been eaten into over the years by the increased number of stops between Waterloo and Bournemouth.

It was said that the first class had compartments 'to meet the demands of the customers', ie the number of Army, Navy, MoD and UKAEA staff that would be regular users.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page