Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:55 29 Mar 2024
- Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
- KFC Nigeria sorry after disabled diner refused service
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
13:48 Bedwyn to Newbury
14:12 Newbury to Bedwyn
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
14:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
12:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
09:10 Penzance to London Paddington
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 14:07:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[153] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[97] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[53] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[41] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[38] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[37] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
Author Topic: Cotham Hill opening to non-motorists  (Read 15234 times)
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 21, 2021, 22:32:10 »

Be careful what you wish for.  Roll Eyes
The problem with Bristol City Council (not my name for them) seems to be, as far as I can tell, that unless you walk or cycle they couldn't give a **** and simply wish to make life hell for motorists: if BCC» (Bristol City Council - about) (or, as I call them, BSC) fail to heed that then that is their stupidity.

Dave

So to be clear, should Bristol City Council (BCC) heed the motorists who wish to rat-run through the area, contributing nothing, or should it heed the rate-paying business owners who requested this change?

Whenever I've spoken to Bristol City Council (BCC) officers, I've found them to be many things, but never stupid. They have to balance conflicting requirements, including central government mandates on air quality and active travel. If they don't comply, they'll be fined.

Edit:VickiS - Clarifying Acronyms
« Last Edit: March 22, 2021, 09:01:00 by VickiS » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 22, 2021, 08:56:32 »

If you think Bristol City Council (BCC» (Bristol City Council - about)) under Marvin Rees wish to make life hell for motorists, then Paris under Hidalgo must be the very fiery inferno.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronyms
« Last Edit: March 22, 2021, 09:01:56 by VickiS » Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 22, 2021, 11:12:22 »

If you think Bristol City Council (BCC» (Bristol City Council - about)) under Marvin Rees wish to make life hell for motorists, then Paris under Hidalgo must be the very fiery inferno.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronyms

These are interesting times. There's such a gulf between people who vaguely recognise that somebody somewhere should probably do something about air pollution and the climate emergency, and those who've been given the job of developing policies. At a recent WECA» (West of England Combined Authority - about) presentation, BCC's Head of Transport stated that motor traffic levels need to reduce to 20% of current levels by 2030. That's not a typo, he didn't say reduce by 20%, but to 20%. For most people this will mean making some fairly large adjustments, but anyone who understands the challenges we face ought to be prepared to do that!
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
DaveHarries
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 259



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 23, 2021, 21:26:26 »

If you think Bristol City Council (BCC» (Bristol City Council - about)) under Marvin Rees wish to make life hell for motorists, then Paris under Hidalgo must be the very fiery inferno.

Edit: VickiS - Clarifying Acronyms

These are interesting times. There's such a gulf between people who vaguely recognise that somebody somewhere should probably do something about air pollution and the climate emergency, and those who've been given the job of developing policies. At a recent WECA» (West of England Combined Authority - about) presentation, BCC's Head of Transport stated that motor traffic levels need to reduce to 20% of current levels by 2030. That's not a typo, he didn't say reduce by 20%, but to 20%. For most people this will mean making some fairly large adjustments, but anyone who understands the challenges we face ought to be prepared to do that!
All very well what people want to happen. The problem, of course, is that you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink it. Pollution levels will only reduce to anywhere approaching that if a viable alternative is provided but walking and cycling won't suit everyone.

Dave
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 23, 2021, 21:40:41 »

All very well what people want to happen. The problem, of course, is that you can lead a horse to water but you can't make them drink it. Pollution levels will only reduce to anywhere approaching that if a viable alternative is provided but walking and cycling won't suit everyone.

Yes walking and cycling will help many for some journeys, but for others good pollution free and carbon free public transport is required first.  Trouble is the reliability and speed of bus services can only improve if there is less traffic congestion on their routes.  Chicken and Egg.

I know people who commute very long distances is that sustainable, do the people need to move or the jobs? Or can enough people work from home?

We may also need to adjust in other ways.  There is a concept of a 15 minute city - where everything for daily life is available within a 15 minute walk, shopping health, schools and work. Not sure how realistic that is, but we can get closer than we are now. 
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #20 on: March 24, 2021, 23:38:36 »

...I have to drive my delivery van there...

I must admit I thought Bristol City Council (BCC» (Bristol City Council - about)) had been rather clever here, leaving an access route via Hampton Park and Hampton Lane so that anyone needing to get to, rather than through, the area can still do so.

But your mileage, as they say Chris, may vary! Do these schemes make it harder for delivery drivers?

Red Squirrel (if I may refer to you here by your full name): have you ever tried to drive a Mercedes Sprinter delivery van along Hampton Lane - and turn left at the end?  Lips sealed

I think Chris from Nailsea has summed it up quite well.

Well, thank you very much!  Grin
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 25, 2021, 10:04:49 »

Red Squirrel (if I may refer to you here by your full name): have you ever tried to drive a Mercedes Sprinter delivery van along Hampton Lane - and turn left at the end?  Lips sealed

It's a fair question. Actually I'm not very good at driving vans; last time I hired one (which was a Sprinter, as I remember it) I ended up having to pay £400 to get the dents knocked out. So I'm probably not the best person to ask!

In my experience, the main problem on Hampton Lane is bins; the left turn at the end could presumably be eased by removing a parking bay. With all these schemes, the devil is in the detail - which presumably will emerge shortly, one way or another.

For completeness, here is the report on the BCC» (Bristol City Council - about) consultation: https://bristol.citizenspace.com/sustainable-transport/cotham-hill-engagement-survey/user_uploads/cotham-hill-early-engagement-report.pdf
« Last Edit: March 25, 2021, 10:20:58 by Red Squirrel » Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Noggin
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 514


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2021, 11:11:17 »

Like it or not, for most people a vehicle is an essential part of life in Bristol, particularly if you are disabled, have children, parents who live in the countryside, work shifts or off the beaten track, have a hobby or a business where you need to ferry gear around etc

That said, there are plenty of trips, particularly commutes, for which a train/bike/walk/bus is great, and there's a lot that can be done to encourage that. I live 15 minutes walk from Temple Meads and even pre-Covid, we'd probably only use the car between us a 5 or 6 times a week, but without one, my wife couldn't easily get to her job as a teacher without it, we couldn't take kids to swimming lessons, take stuff to the tip, visit her family etc.   

Ultimately there needs to be a balance that sees car use as valid and integrates it, but in such a way that people can safely walk and cycle around the city and that it doesn't get in the way of public transport.

If you ban cars completely from the city, then you'll just end up exiling the people who want/need to own cars to the countryside or outer suburbs, where they will drive everywhere, shop, eat and play in chain stores etc. Cities will be all the poorer for it.
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: March 25, 2021, 11:29:39 »

Like it or not, for most people a vehicle is an essential part of life in Bristol, particularly if you are disabled, have children, parents who live in the countryside, work shifts or off the beaten track, have a hobby or a business where you need to ferry gear around etc

That said, there are plenty of trips, particularly commutes, for which a train/bike/walk/bus is great, and there's a lot that can be done to encourage that. I live 15 minutes walk from Temple Meads and even pre-Covid, we'd probably only use the car between us a 5 or 6 times a week, but without one, my wife couldn't easily get to her job as a teacher without it, we couldn't take kids to swimming lessons, take stuff to the tip, visit her family etc.   

Ultimately there needs to be a balance that sees car use as valid and integrates it, but in such a way that people can safely walk and cycle around the city and that it doesn't get in the way of public transport.

If you ban cars completely from the city, then you'll just end up exiling the people who want/need to own cars to the countryside or outer suburbs, where they will drive everywhere, shop, eat and play in chain stores etc. Cities will be all the poorer for it.

Couldn't agree more with the above - That is exactly what we try and encourage over here. Quote from the Saint Brieuc Urban Travel Plan:

Quote
"Our territory is attractive, constantly evolving with new housing and new activities taking hold: The need for travel (whether on foot, by bicycle, by public transport or by car) is increasing. Air quality has been affected, with recent years, a deterioration which shows the need to change mobility practices.

Many objectives are to be achieved, including:
- Guaranteeing good accessibility for everyone and the safety of everyone when traveling;
- Preserve the environment and improve the living environment;
- Foster coherence between urbanization and travel offer.

The general objective of this project is not to demonize the car, but to ensure that the use of it is neither exclusive nor an obstacle to the practice of other modes of travel, such as is too often the case today. With its Urban Travel Plan, Saint-Brieuc Armor Agglomeration affirms the desire to move from a system where the automobile is dominant to a sustainable system which is part of a complementarity between the different modes of transport."
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 25, 2021, 11:43:15 »

I think the last paragraph Lee quoted sums it up rather well:

Quote
The general objective of this project is not to demonize the car, but to ensure that the use of it is neither exclusive nor an obstacle to the practice of other modes of travel, such as is too often the case today. With its Urban Travel Plan, Saint-Brieuc Armor Agglomeration affirms the desire to move from a system where the automobile is dominant to a sustainable system which is part of a complementarity between the different modes of transport.

...which is exactly what schemes like this one are trying to achieve. At present, the storage and use of private cars totally dominates all other forms of transport in most parts of most cities. It makes walking unpleasant, cycling dangerous, and buses slow and unreliable. We can't change this without affecting people's habits, but ultimately people will have more choices - including the option to use a private motor car, as long as they do so without expecting every other kind of road user to get out of their way.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
DaveHarries
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 259



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 25, 2021, 23:17:18 »

I think the last paragraph Lee quoted sums it up rather well: [....] It makes walking unpleasant, cycling dangerous, and buses slow and unreliable.
I don't wish to sound anti-cyclist (which I am not, except against those who don't ride in a sensible fashion) but I see examples on a near daily basis of cyclists making it dangerous for themselves (by pretend ignorance of red traffic signals, for example) and others: I was nearly sent flying into the road in Bicester on Tuesday by three cyclists belting along the pavement (which was not a shared one) on the road to the station while in the town on a work errand.

Pity there wasn't somebody around who could have fined all three.

Dave
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5191


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: March 25, 2021, 23:36:01 »

It's a fair comment. I see often see cyclists running red lights, riding without lights or wearing headphones. I also see motorists speeding, answering phones and blocking pavements, and pedestrians who are perhaps a bit too interested in keeping up with twitter to know what's going on around them. I suppose the majority - sensible cyclists, motorists and pedestrians - don't attract our attention so much.

I'm not sure any of this has much relevance to the need to rebalance public space so that cars just get most of it, instead of nearly all of it, though.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
DaveHarries
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 259



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 26, 2021, 01:16:59 »

It's a fair comment. I see often see cyclists running red lights, riding without lights or wearing headphones. I also see motorists speeding, answering phones and blocking pavements, and pedestrians who are perhaps a bit too interested in keeping up with twitter to know what's going on around them. I suppose the majority - sensible cyclists, motorists and pedestrians - don't attract our attention so much.

I'm not sure any of this has much relevance to the need to rebalance public space so that cars just get most of it, instead of nearly all of it, though.
I know that motorists are not all saints when it comes to road use and those who break the rules by doing things such as answer their phones in a non-handsfree way deserve whatever punishment they may get: one of my colleagues got a half year ban earlier this year for doing it twice and lost her job too for good measure. I do see a few sensible cyclists but it seems to me that there are not enough of them.

Anyway back to the topic.....

Dave
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: March 26, 2021, 09:53:27 »

Hampton Lane is not much more than a Mercedes Sprinter van wide. What happens when Chris meets a van from Another Purveyor of Essential Groceries coming the other way? I have a vision of two vans in contrasting liveries, bumper to bumper, wheels smoking, each trying to force the other back!  Shocked Wink It could be the most exciting thing to happen in that little lane for years!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #29 on: March 27, 2021, 01:34:00 »

Actually, it's not like that at all.  No, really.  Wink

We're all professional grocery delivery van drivers, so in my experience, we do our best to help each other, in any such meeting.  I've pulled over (where possible), given the other driver an invitation to pull forward / squeeze past, or even reversed to the beginning of that road, if necessary.

Contrasting liveries really doesn't enter into it: we all want to deliver those necessaries to those needies.  Wink

Chris from Waitrose Nailsea.  Lips sealed
Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page