Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 28 Mar 2024
* Manhunt after stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:33 Weymouth to Gloucester
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 11:39:38 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[161] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[91] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[62] Return of the BRUTE?
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[49] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[38] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Tree felling on the St Ives branch causes local anger  (Read 3424 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: April 14, 2021, 19:14:21 »

From Cornwall Live

Quote
Network Rail apologises to Cornwall residents after tree felling 'butchery' near St Ives

Ash trees were cut down after a request from a 'third party', close to where people are up in arms about Carbis Bay Hotel cutting down trees for a development without permission for the G7 Summit

Network Rail has apologised to locals after a number of trees were cut down on land near Carbis Bay and St Ives. People who live near the St Ives branch line were dismayed when a number of ash trees were felled last month.

The area of land next to the railway line, which recently underwent a £3 million improvement programme, was levelled at Portminster Point between Carbis Bay and St Ives.

One local labelled it “butchery” while another said: “Absolutely disgusting! Who gives permission for all these trees to be felled? I thought with climate change we should be planting trees!”

Another resident added: “This has completely changed the feel of the environment and no doubt had a negative impact on the ecology of the site. This looked pretty unusual and seemed completely over the top for the management that needs to take place along the railway line to ensure its safe running. It also seems to go against all of network rails many environmental policies.”

It came at the same time as the felling of trees by the Carbis Bay Hotel to make way for meeting rooms for the G7 Summit, which it is hosting in June, caused so much consternation that a protest of around 200 people took place on the beach earlier this month.

Network Rail has stressed that the Porthminster Point work had nothing to do with the tree felling at the Carbis Bay Hotel but has apologised to locals for the incident which “did not meet the high standards we set ourselves”.

A spokesperson for the company which runs Britain’s railways said the felling had been carried out at the same time as the £3m improvements although it had nothing to do with that work and had been carried out at the request of a “third party”.

Oh dear.   I have some sympathy for Network Rail in having to keep lines safe, clear and maintainable resulting, at times, in the need for unwelcome management of natural green growth along the way.    But, sadly, there seem to be all to many stories where they end up having to apologise - not the first time, is it? 

At times I wonder if it's far more convenient for Network Rail to just go ahead and do something and just say "very sorry" afterwards that go through proper procedures, or maintain something that's of use or beauty, but is expensive to maintain and / or operationally inconvenient.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2021, 19:34:18 »

At times I wonder if it's far more convenient for Network Rail to just go ahead and do something and just say "very sorry" afterwards that go through proper procedures, or maintain something that's of use or beauty, but is expensive to maintain and / or operationally inconvenient.

Or even when they allegedly do follow "proper procedures", but ignore the consultation responses. Like with certain footbridges, for example...
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 547


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2021, 10:21:34 »

The problem with ash trees is ash tree dieback.  There are requirements to clear infected (and nearby) trees.  I am surprised this was not mentioned but it would have spoilt a good story.  The estimate is that now it is established the UK (United Kingdom) will loose 80% of the ash trees.
Logged
Jamsdad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 201


View Profile Email
« Reply #3 on: April 21, 2021, 15:01:33 »

Many people assume all trees are protected. In fact relatively few are and land owners are free to fell any others without consultation.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 21, 2021, 21:56:03 »

Quote
Many people assume all trees are protected. In fact relatively few are and land owners are free to fell any others without consultation

Actually, that's not correct. There's no carte blanche for tree felling, instead there's a requirement for a felling licence from the Forestry Commission with some (admittedly quite wide ranging) exemptions, but a number of additional controls on top - see  https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/876641/Tree_Felling_-_Getting_Permission_-_office_print_version.pdf

Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 21, 2021, 22:53:23 »

Actually, that's not correct. There's no carte blanche for tree felling, instead there's a requirement for a felling licence from the Forestry Commission with some (admittedly quite wide ranging) exemptions,

Yes quite wide ranging:

Quote
There are exceptions that apply to:
• fruit trees, for example, orchard species
like apple, pear or plum;
• trees standing or growing in an orchard,
garden, churchyard or public open
space; and
• trees growing in the inner London boroughs
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 533



View Profile Email
« Reply #6 on: April 22, 2021, 07:25:49 »

I'm surprised GWR (Great Western Railway) haven't complained to Torbay Council about their plans to plant 150 Giant Redwood trees alongside the railway and proposed Edginswell Station.

Service Suspended Leaf on the line!

https://www.torbay.gov.uk/news/pr8294/

Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #7 on: April 22, 2021, 07:41:49 »

I'm surprised GWR (Great Western Railway) haven't complained to Torbay Council about their plans to plant 150 Giant Redwood trees alongside the railway and proposed Edginswell Station.

Service Suspended Leaf on the line!

https://www.torbay.gov.uk/news/pr8294/


Do redwood trees even have leaves, or are they pine needles?   For sure, pine needles carpet forest floors, but are they slippery and as much of a problem on railway tracks as leaves?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2021, 10:01:59 »

I'm surprised GWR (Great Western Railway) haven't complained to Torbay Council about their plans to plant 150 Giant Redwood trees alongside the railway and proposed Edginswell Station.

Service Suspended Leaf on the line!

https://www.torbay.gov.uk/news/pr8294/


Do redwood trees even have leaves, or are they pine needles?   For sure, pine needles carpet forest floors, but are they slippery and as much of a problem on railway tracks as leaves?

The industry Bible ("Managing Low Adhesion") says surprisingly little about trees with needles rather than leaves. Just one use of "conifer", to be exact:
Quote
Felling is a sensitive issue where trees have grown to form a barrier between the railway and its neighbours. While some felling may be unavoidable because of the safety implications, the visual impact can be lessened by thinning vegetation to form a series of overlapping chevrons at an angle to the track so that the screening effect is maintained. There is also the option of re-planting with more railway-friendly trees such as conifers or small-leaved deciduous saplings.

It also has tables listing suitable species to plant, all of them broad-leaved (though not too broad). They just seem to assume everyone knows conifers are not a problem.

And yes, redwoods are conifers.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2021, 13:49:12 »

Bearing in mind that most conifers are resinous, I would have thought that they were also likely to be problematic.
Logged
REVUpminster
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 533



View Profile Email
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2021, 17:14:10 »

I'm surprised GWR (Great Western Railway) haven't complained to Torbay Council about their plans to plant 150 Giant Redwood trees alongside the railway and proposed Edginswell Station.

Service Suspended Leaf on the line!

https://www.torbay.gov.uk/news/pr8294/


Do redwood trees even have leaves, or are they pine needles?   For sure, pine needles carpet forest floors, but are they slippery and as much of a problem on railway tracks as leaves?
Mustn't let facts get in the way of a good story.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 26, 2021, 22:41:21 »

My sympathies are with network rail.
"The railway" is widely ridiculed when extensive delays result in the leaf fall season, with calls for "something to be done" And no that network rail are doing something, look at the fuss.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5190


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 27, 2021, 12:02:15 »

I referred to ash die-back here: http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/coffeeshop/index.php?topic=231.msg304816#msg304816

It's a safety issue: the upper branches die first, which causes heavy lumps of wood to drop on people from a great height.


Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page