Lots of "scatter" on Bus Back Better - starting this thread as a continuing report for our area and hopefully elements may be of wider use too. I have just applied a lick of paint to the option 24/7 web site - summary there at
http://option247.uk/faq.html and as follows:
What's the background?* The bus system in the
UK▸ has major issues that need addressing for the future
* In many places it had become a skeleton service, only used if there were no alternatives and in too many places lost completely or providing no service
* Covid has made the whole bus network uneconomic and it is under government support
* Carbon Zero needs a much stronger / cleaner / better mass travel / public transport network
What's happening now?* The Government (on 15th March 2021) announced "Bus Back Better" (BBB) which has made their future funding (of £3 billion) and support of Local Transport Authorities (
LTAs▸ ) dependent on the LTA following their direction.
* Bus Back Better calls for Bus Service Improvement Plans (BSIPs) and their implementation
* BSIPs are to be drawn up by LTAs, Operators and the Communities to be served in the area served, with the communities having a significant role. Due by the end of October 2021 to be implemented April 2022 and revised every six months thereafter
* There are many experts in regulation (LTAs and their governance), operation (drivers, managers, maintenance staff) and bus and infrastucture provision (designers and regulation)
So where does community input come from?* There are no bodies / root and branch organsiations in place with linked expertise and mandated with correlating practical advice and inputs.
* In Wiltshire, the Option 24/7 team brought together community skills and gained knowedge of how service could be improved in the very different background of 2016, when major cuts were being proposed. The outcome was only minor cuts. The Option 24/7 team is still together.
* Elements of BBB call for exactly what Option 24/7 was suggesting in 2016; "we could have written that" said one of our team, although really it's just common sense.
* Option 24/7 worked / works well with our LTA team and has an understanding and experience of practical public transport issues, good relations with partners.
* In the absence of alternatives, the Option 24/7 team offers itself as a/the vehicle, with partners, to take BSIPs forward and beyond the plans to work with LTAs and operators to market and help ensure that services really work for everyone for the decade ahead
How will this work?* Option 24/7 starts as a thin team of unfunded volunteers. We are looking (in the purdah period to 6th May) at structure and updating our presence and long(er) term funding and resources.
* We will provide tools, suggestions, sanity checks, co-ordination across all 18 community areas.
* We are already working with groups in some neighbouring authorities and will continue to do so. This is because the methodlogy is common across England, and can be usefully shared; we are not competitive. It is also because many services run across county / LTA borders and the future must include the inter-LTA services.
* Signups / formal registation of interest from 10th May (more formalised than we have started with so far)
The work so far* Presentations of 29.3.2021 and 19.4.2021 (which look at much of the above in more detail)
* Expressions of interest and some real thought from dozens of people, across 6 of the community areas
* Informal discussions to help us understand what our LTA view might be, leading to initial thoughts and more detailed case work on a test area.
* Seed funding (a few hundred pounds) identified for initial survey publicity
* The setup for the above / web site work / planning and admin.
* Listening to people!
What can I do? * Read in
* Get in touch to offer your help
From the Bus Back Better paper of 15.3.2021:
Buses are at the centre of the public transport network, making 4.07 billion journeys in England in 2019/20
For decades, buses have been largely ignored by policymakers. Unlike rail, road aviation, cycling or walking, there was not – until now – a national strategy for buses. And unlike rail or road, buses have never – until now – had long-term funding commitments. Almost uniquely in the developed world, bus operators themselves, outside London, decide where most services are run and what to charge.
COVID-19 has caused a significant shift from public transport to the private car. To avoid the worst effects of a car-led recovery – cities and towns grinding to a halt; pollution, road injuries, respiratory illness and carbon emissions all rising – we need to shift back quickly, by making radical improvements to local public transport as normal life returns. Buses are the quickest, easiest and cheapest way to do that.
To achieve our goal, this strategy will make buses more frequent, more reliable, easier to understand and use, better co-ordinated and cheaper: in other words, more like London’s, where these type of improvements dramatically increased passenger numbers, reduced congestion, carbon and pollution, helped the disadvantaged and got motorists out of their cars.
We want the same fully integrated service, the same simple, multi- modal tickets, the same increases in bus priority measures, the same high-quality information for passengers and, in larger places, the same turn-up-and-go frequencies. We want services that keep running into the evenings and at weekends.
Edit to correct typos
