Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:35 28 Mar 2024
* Man held over stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
13:26 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
13:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
12:42 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
12:46 Avonmouth to Weston-Super-Mare
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:07 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:26 Okehampton to Exeter Central
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
11:29 Weymouth to Gloucester
11:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
12:27 Okehampton to Exeter Central
12:28 Plymouth to Gunnislake
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 13:37:46 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[142] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[80] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[56] Return of the BRUTE?
[46] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[43] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[34] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 49
  Print  
Author Topic: Problems with IET trains from April 2021  (Read 93534 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #315 on: May 14, 2021, 19:05:17 »

A further snippet of real information from Clarence Yard is that the material in question is A7N01S-T5 and its suitability for the corrosive environment is in question. That's obviously eminently Googleable, and the top hits mostly say this is an alloy much used in high-speed train bodies, and it suffers from stress corrosion cracking (SCC(resolve)). The alloy's main components, other than aluminium, are zinc, magnesium, manganese, plus variable amounts other elements. The corrosion usually comes from chlorides, but apparently the process inside the cracks involves hydrogen.

This form of cracking does specialise in sudden failures, unexpected because the cracking is internal, so maybe we should be thankful that it was spotted before that happened. It has been known for ages, but by all accounts it is still hard to predict or control, or even to find by inspection. Hitachi's job was of course to manage all such risks, including the hard ones, so there's no excuses there - except, perhaps, in a specification that wasn't accurate. But could the UK (United Kingdom) train environment for all fleets (i.e. not just the 802s that venture past Dawlish) be saltier than elsewhere (e.g. Japan), and than was specified? That doesn't sound likely ...  but we must await further intelligence.
Logged
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6435


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #316 on: May 14, 2021, 20:19:58 »

A further snippet of real information from Clarence Yard is that the material in question is A7N01S-T5 and its suitability for the corrosive environment is in question. That's obviously eminently Googleable...

Indeed, and it seems to gave been a favourite research topic for the budding metallurgist (not me - guitarist once) or stress engineer for quite a few years. I read a bit of this paper from 2016. I have no idea what it says, other than that hydrogen can be an issue as you said. The pictures are good, though equally meaningless to my untrained eye. The point is, though, that one assumes all these matters were considered, and the choice of alloy was deemed sufficient for the job awaiting it. That will be occupying minds for some little while.
Logged

Now, please!
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #317 on: May 15, 2021, 05:07:42 »

From JourneyCheck:

Saturday 15 May

"A number of Class 800 series Hitachi trains in use by several train companies, including GWR (Great Western Railway), were withdrawn from service earlier this week as a precaution. After completing rigorous safety checks, we will begin reintroducing train services. Trains on some routes will be less frequent than usual, and your journey might take longer than it normally would. "

"We're running a reduced timetable as we reintroduce services after safety checks. Trains might be busier than normal. Check your journey before you travel."

Local and regional trains are not affected and will continue to run as normal.
 
There are no through services between London Paddington & Cheltenham Spa.
 
A shuttle service will operate between Swindon and Gloucester only where onward connections are available.

The direct train which normally runs between London Paddington, Reading, and Oxford for stations via Evesham to Worcester, Great Malvern and Hereford has been withdrawn. A revised service will run along the Oxford - Evesham - Worcester route.

An hourly service will operate between London Paddington and Bristol Temple Meads.
 
Extra shuttle trains will run between Swindon, Didcot Parkway, Reading, and London Paddington.

Most GWR long distance services between London Paddington and Penzance via Exeter St Davids & Plymouth are expected to operate.

Most GWR long distance services between London Paddington and Swansea via Bristol Parkway & Cardiff Central are expected to operate.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2021, 07:27:59 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #318 on: May 16, 2021, 07:37:31 »

JourneyCheck this morning (Sunday 16th May 2021) - no new line updates, but the reports are timestamped this morning.  Amended trains are in the journey planners.   In brief:

* London to Swansea, London to Bristol, London to Plymouth running about hourly
* Shuttle services running Oxford to Worcester,  Swindon to Cheltenham Spa, Bedwyn to Reading

There are a few reported "shortforms" such as

Quote
11:30 London Paddington to Paignton due 14:59
Facilities on the 11:30 London Paddington to Paignton due 14:59.
This is due to more trains than usual needing repairs at the same time.
Will be formed of 5 coaches instead of 9.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #319 on: May 16, 2021, 15:33:38 »

With UNCONFIRMED reports suggesting that "dozens" of GWR (Great Western Railway) IETs (Intercity Express Train) are unavailable, it seems very surprising that an only slightly reduced service is being offered.

So is the only slightly reduced service  a "fiddle" achieved by declaring a significantly reduced service to be the "new normal"
Or are more IETS available than has been suggested ?
As well as the issue of cracks, I would expect a few units to be unavailable due to routine servicing and unrelated random mechanical faults.

So, so does anyone have actual figures for GWR IETs
1)number of units available for use.
2)number of units stopped due to cracks.
3) number of units unavailable due to routine servicing or unrelated mechanical failures.

And other data, such as reasonably expected changes in the above.

I appreciate that some members feel that my remarks about these trains are unduly frequent, or overly critical, and am therefore limiting such remarks.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #320 on: May 16, 2021, 16:08:44 »

From yesterday, we had a figure of 54-60 out of 93 (58 5-car and 35 9-car) units expected in service.Those are full fleet numbers, so there's no margin for maintenance or failure.

Now the man on the spot, Clarence Yard, has just given an update on railforums - 59 now with more to be added during today. That can only mean that some of those previously signed off long-term sick have been given a fit note. That's not unreasonable, given that the general strategy has been a precautionary one: stop trains on suspicion, and then look for evidence that they can, after all, be operated with close monitoring.
« Last Edit: May 16, 2021, 16:48:06 by stuving » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #321 on: May 16, 2021, 16:09:26 »

I don't have answers to your questions, but I've been practicing being a politician and answering a different question in such a way you won't notice it's not what you asked.   Ooops ...  Grin

Comparing what was expected for Summer 2021 when the December 2019 timetable was introduced, you may see:

2 an hour Bristol to London via Parkway Superfast - 8 trains not running
Still running 2 an hour via Chippenham

1 an hour Cardiff to London - 4 trains not running
Still running hourly Swansea to London
Also electric shuttle London to Swindon

1 an hour Bedwyn to London - 3 trains not running
Running electric to Newbury for turbo shuttle

1 every 2 hours semifast Exeter to London - 3 trains not running
Alternate Plymouth exprsses calling between Reading and Taunton

1 an hour London to north Cotswold line - 6 trains not running
Turbo shuttle Oxford to Worcester

1 every hour Cheltenham Spa to London - 5 trains not running
Turbo shuttle Swindon to Gloucester
Also electric shuttle London to Swindon

I make that about 30 IET (Intercity Express Train) diagrams, with perhaps half a dozen each of Turbo and 387 diagrams filling in with shuttles.  What normality you compare to, though, is an interesting question. It might very much depend on traffic levels when and where 5, 9 and 10 cars were  expected to be needed and will be expected to be needed this summer.  Or indeed whether a 15 minute Paddington to Swindon service rather than a 10 minute service is adequate for a while.

I wonder where the turbos are coming from ... units that will be required for MetroWest, perhaps, or is there a risk of 2 cars on the Summer Saturday Weymouth trains?

Details / correction to the above welcome.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #322 on: May 16, 2021, 16:20:53 »

I appreciate that some members feel that my remarks about these trains are unduly frequent, or overly critical, and am therefore limiting such remarks.

At least no-one can accuse the trains themselves of being "unduly frequent" !
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #323 on: May 16, 2021, 16:26:46 »

I expect Tornado will be kept in steam just in case.

Several crystal ball predictions looking on shaky ground.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #324 on: May 16, 2021, 17:13:38 »

My understanding from prior to this problsm was that 70 IET (Intercity Express Train) units are required to service what would have been the new May timetable on a werkday. So 59 is only 11 short of that requirement whicjh in no one’s vocabulary could be described as “dozens”
Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #325 on: May 16, 2021, 17:23:56 »

Looks like the Paddington-Exeter/Plymouth/Paignton semi fasts are running next week.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #326 on: May 16, 2021, 19:47:40 »

There's now a picture of the new phase 2 cracking, but first here's the one from phase 1 in April again (the previous picture has vanished). This was "liberated" from the NIR (national incident report) that prompted all 80x and similar fleets to be examined. As always any comments of mine can only be superficial.

That looks to me like fatigue cracking in form, and its location isn't so unlikely given the oscillating loads on it. The bracket under that piece attaches not only the yaw damper bracket but also a vertical link to the anti-roll bar, which is probably more relevant in this context. (I'm sure there's a vertical damper or two somewhere as well, but haven't spotted them yet.)

While I did think at first that was a single casting, on second thoughts (and looks) there is weld metal visible behind the screw head (or nut). The whole bolster may even have been made from many little plates, all welded, like they were cut from a sheet of balsa with an X-acto knife and glued.

The picture of the phase 2 crack apparently was put out by Mark Hopwood on LinkedIn - for some reason. What strikes me about that is how straight it is, like two pieces of metal placed next to each other for welding but next fixed. Or, perhaps, that the weld was made on the other side, and has cracked allowing the join this side to move.

In this case there no obvious source of the kind of cyclic stresses that would lead to fatigue. That probably explains the initial precautionary overreaction, and the accompanying chorus of scratched heads.
Logged
RailCornwall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 642


View Profile
« Reply #327 on: May 16, 2021, 20:38:11 »

Not a regular user of Sunday Evening services, but looking at tiger tonight it seems a fairly full service is operating across Cornwall this evening. Tomorrow will be telling.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #328 on: May 16, 2021, 22:25:28 »

There’s been a lot of stock movements today, IET (Intercity Express Train)’s and other, to try and get everything back to where it needs to be for tomorrow.  I doubt it’ll be perfect, but hopefully far better than many, including myself, envisaged a few days ago.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #329 on: May 17, 2021, 11:32:23 »

I don't have answers to your questions, but I've been practicing being a politician and answering a different question in such a way you won't notice it's not what you asked.   Ooops ...  Grin

Comparing what was expected for Summer 2021 when the December 2019 timetable was introduced, you may see:

2 an hour Bristol to London via Parkway Superfast - 8 trains not running
Still running 2 an hour via Chippenham

1 an hour Cardiff to London - 4 trains not running
Still running hourly Swansea to London
Also electric shuttle London to Swindon

1 an hour Bedwyn to London - 3 trains not running
Running electric to Newbury for turbo shuttle

1 every 2 hours semifast Exeter to London - 3 trains not running
Alternate Plymouth exprsses calling between Reading and Taunton

1 an hour London to north Cotswold line - 6 trains not running
Turbo shuttle Oxford to Worcester

1 every hour Cheltenham Spa to London - 5 trains not running
Turbo shuttle Swindon to Gloucester
Also electric shuttle London to Swindon

I make that about 30 IET (Intercity Express Train) diagrams, with perhaps half a dozen each of Turbo and 387 diagrams filling in with shuttles.  What normality you compare to, though, is an interesting question. It might very much depend on traffic levels when and where 5, 9 and 10 cars were  expected to be needed and will be expected to be needed this summer.  Or indeed whether a 15 minute Paddington to Swindon service rather than a 10 minute service is adequate for a while.

I wonder where the turbos are coming from ... units that will be required for MetroWest, perhaps, or is there a risk of 2 cars on the Summer Saturday Weymouth trains?

Details / correction to the above welcome.



That number of trains that are "not running" but that do not count as cancellations does sound to me like a fiddle to make things look better than they are.

And the report that GWR (Great Western Railway) are only short of 11 IETs is better than the "dozens" suggested elsewhere but it is still a significant shortfall.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 20 21 [22] 23 24 ... 49
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page