Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
End of through trains
Bristol to Waterloo - Why?

 
Please sign our petition
(more information)
 
Campaign links here
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:35 05 Dec 2021
* Covid: Travel changes too late to halt potential new wave - scientist
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 09/12/21 - Award Event - CRN
10/12/21 - Final day, service to Bristol
19/01/22 - MTUG - regular meeting
08/03/22 - WWRUG AGM - B-o-A
Random Image
Train RunningCancelled
13:50 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
14:18 Penzance to London Paddington
15:25 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
20:20 Westbury to Swindon
20:33 Southampton Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:13 Swindon to Westbury
22:02 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
23:10 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
23:13 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Southampton Central to Westbury
Short Run
13:32 Southampton Central to Cardiff Central
14:33 Southampton Central to Cardiff Central
15:18 Reading to Gatwick Airport
15:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:30 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
17:25 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
17:37 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:25 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
19:33 Southampton Central to Cardiff Central
20:30 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
20:36 Bristol Temple Meads to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
05/12/21 14:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 14:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 15:17 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 15:42 London Paddington to Swansea
15:55 Cardiff Central to Taunton
05/12/21 16:22 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 16:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 17:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 17:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 18:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 19:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 19:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 20:19 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 20:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 21:42 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 05, 2021, 04:52:07 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[102] Are the railways fit for their (future) purpose?
[90] Masks To Become Compulsory On Public Transport Again
[58] Through service - Bristol to London (Waterloo) via Trowbridge ...
[46] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[32] Advent quiz - day 3 - unlabelled maps
[16] Overhead Electrification Plans
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Research on how people expect to travel in the future  (Read 7788 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35007



View Profile WWW Email
« on: April 29, 2021, 05:07:24 pm »

From Passenger Transport

Quote
One third expect to use public transport less

Research by Edinburgh Napier University suggests pandemic will deter public from using buses and trains, hindering key government objectives

Some figures ....

Quote
The Impact of Covid-19 on travel behaviour, transport, lifestyles and location choices in Scotland report was produced by the University’s Transport Research Institute with backing from the Scottish Funding Council. Nearly 1,000 (994) Scottish residents completed a detailed survey, designed to inform understanding of how Covid-19 might alter travel choices in the near future and guide appropriate policy responses. Participant age and gender were broadly representative of the wider population.

The survey found 45% of respondents expected to walk more, 29% expected to cycle more and 25% expected to drive their car more in the post-Covid future than they did before the pandemic.

However, in stark contrast, 42% anticipated using aeroplanes less, 36% using buses less and 34% using trains less. The most common reasons given for using public transport less in the future were the possibility of getting infections from other passengers, lack of cleanliness/hygiene on board and overcrowding.

“Although part of it may be due to current overexposure to discussions about infective diseases and so be transient, such lack of confidence in public transport is not good news for the industry,” said Dr Achille Fonzone, associate professor of transport analysis and planning at Edinburgh Napier. “It is not good news for Scotland either, considering the importance of public transport to ensure an equitable and sustainable mobility.”



My highlighting, and I would agree.   If Coronavirus is rare and not resurgent, in a year or two the concerns might be a distant memory.  But people may have change their habits and life style and be hard to win back - indeed travel as a whole may be reduced.  Some data on that too

Quote
In other findings, over half of workers (54%) expect to work from home more in the post-Covid future than they did before the pandemic and 64% stated that they will use technology more to communicate with colleagues, customers or clients. Over half (52%) of respondents expect to use technology to communicate with family and friends more.

When asked about their future shopping habits, 45% expected to do more online non-grocery shopping in the future and 36% anticipate using home delivery for supermarket shopping more.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
rogerw
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1174



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 29, 2021, 05:26:05 pm »

I don't think it helped that the Government was giving out a strong message not to use public transport or even, in one case, suggesting that it was dangerous to do so.
Logged

I like to travel.  It lets me feel I'm getting somewhere.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35007



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #2 on: June 08, 2021, 06:10:32 am »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57339105

Quote
The five-day office week could become the norm again within two years, the Centre for Cities think tank has told the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page).

A blend of home and office work is expected to be popular while the UK (United Kingdom) recovers from the pandemic.

But some analysts then anticipate a shift back to pre-Covid working patterns for many.

Shows how varied opinions are ... expectation from a GWR (Great Western Railway) presentation last week is that an average full time working person in an office will drop from 4.4 round trips between home to 2.26 (I think that was the figure) for the future.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Lee
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7477


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: June 08, 2021, 10:44:22 am »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57339105

Quote
The five-day office week could become the norm again within two years, the Centre for Cities think tank has told the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page).

A blend of home and office work is expected to be popular while the UK (United Kingdom) recovers from the pandemic.

But some analysts then anticipate a shift back to pre-Covid working patterns for many.

Shows how varied opinions are ... expectation from a GWR (Great Western Railway) presentation last week is that an average full time working person in an office will drop from 4.4 round trips between home to 2.26 (I think that was the figure) for the future.

The Centre for Cities describes itself as "the leading think tank dedicated to improving the economies of the UK's largest cities and towns." - so it does have rather a vested interest in making its prediction come true.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4501



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 07, 2021, 02:16:46 pm »

I agree that the "center for cities" have a vested interest, but would also argue that GWR (Great Western Railway) have a vested interest in the opposite direction. Forecasting an approximate halving of commuting avoids undue attention being given to the failed IET (Intercity Express Train) project.

"We don't really need that many trains with the reduction in commuting"
"5 car units are fine with the reduced passenger numbers"
"Super fasts no longer needed"

And of course if commuter numbers DO return to nearly pre covid levels they can say

"This is totally unexpected and could not have been foreseen"
" Increasing train lengths (to those originally promised) is more complex than is realised, and will take time.
" Studies are underway as to how best to meet increased demand"
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 6078


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 07, 2021, 09:25:07 pm »

I agree that the "center for cities" have a vested interest, but would also argue that GWR (Great Western Railway) have a vested interest in the opposite direction. Forecasting an approximate halving of commuting avoids undue attention being given to the failed IET (Intercity Express Train) project.

"We don't really need that many trains with the reduction in commuting"
"5 car units are fine with the reduced passenger numbers"
"Super fasts no longer needed"

And of course if commuter numbers DO return to nearly pre covid levels they can say

"This is totally unexpected and could not have been foreseen"
" Increasing train lengths (to those originally promised) is more complex than is realised, and will take time.
" Studies are underway as to how best to meet increased demand"

I don't know why, but sometimes I get this feeling that you don't like IETs?
Logged
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 214


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 07, 2021, 10:55:47 pm »

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57339105

Quote
The five-day office week could become the norm again within two years, the Centre for Cities think tank has told the BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page).

A blend of home and office work is expected to be popular while the UK (United Kingdom) recovers from the pandemic.

But some analysts then anticipate a shift back to pre-Covid working patterns for many.

Shows how varied opinions are ... expectation from a GWR (Great Western Railway) presentation last week is that an average full time working person in an office will drop from 4.4 round trips between home to 2.26 (I think that was the figure) for the future.
In my personal case it'll reduce to about a round trip every four months. Vastly outweighed by leisure travel on a personal level. Really quite weird in retrospect that a year and a half ago I couldn't imagine anything other than going into an office five days a week.
Logged

broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4501



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 08, 2021, 02:30:28 am »


I don't know why, but sometimes I get this feeling that you don't like IETs (Intercity Express Train)?

No I do not. They represent a considerable backward step as regards passenger facilities and comfort, as discussed elsewhere in these forums.

And now this is compounded by a significant lack of availability whether due to cracks or other faults. Years ago I stated that a single 5 car unit was unsuited to busy trains to/from London. We were told that "all trains to/from London that need to be full length, will be" And what has happened ? 5 car units full and standing on busy services.

Supporters will still claim that they are not bad really and that train length is now less important. But by any common sense standards the project has been a failure.

Timely introduction ? FAIL delivered late.
Japanese reliability ? FAIL, not just the cracks but also overheating, coupling faults, and general poor build quality.
Seating comfort ? FAIL, no doubt some people like them but the general view is of a backward step.
Luggage space ? FAIL, surfboards banned, cycle spaces insufficient and badly designed, as discussed elsewhere.
Catering ? FAIL, none of the promises made about the trolley have been achieved, see the catering thread for details.
Train length ? FAIL, years after introduction short formations are frequent, and that with a reduced timetable.

Whilst they might eventually come right, for how many years are we to wait ? "jam tomorrow" has become "jam in a few years" maybe.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page