Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 13:55 25 Apr 2024
* Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services within five years
* Will Labour’s plan make train tickets cheaper?
* Labour pledges to renationalise most rail services
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

No 'On This Day' events reported for 25th Apr

Train RunningCancelled
15:05 Reading to Basingstoke
15:52 Basingstoke to Reading
16:33 Reading to Basingstoke
16:58 London Paddington to Evesham
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Moreton-In-Marsh
17:05 Oxford to Didcot Parkway
17:19 Basingstoke to Reading
17:57 Reading to Basingstoke
18:19 Moreton-In-Marsh to Oxford
18:37 Basingstoke to Reading
Short Run
12:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
Delayed
12:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 25, 2024, 14:02:10 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[280] Labour to nationalise railways within five years of coming to ...
[77] Lack of rolling stock due to attacks on shipping in the Red Se...
[53] Cornish delays
[50] Theft from Severn Valley Railway
[28] Where have I been?
[27] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: New rail look - new uniform font. Will there be a new uniform livery too?  (Read 2034 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40827



View Profile WWW Email
« on: May 20, 2021, 09:04:24 »

As a customer, how will I notice the difference?

Are you a graphic designer?  ...
Quote
Great British Railways will introduce Rail Alphabet 2 across the rail network, replacing the many different fonts used on railway signage

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_Alphabet

Quote
New Rail Alphabet

In 2009, a newly digitised version of the typeface was publicly released. Created by Henrik Kubel of A2/SW/HK in close collaboration with Margaret Calvert, New Rail Alphabet features six weights: off white, white, light, medium, bold and black, with non-aligning numerals, corresponding italics and a set of Eastern European characters.

Rail Alphabet 2

In 2020, it was announced that Network Rail had commissioned an updated version of the typeface. Designed by Margaret Calvert and Henrik Kubel, Rail Alphabet 2 includes a lighter, more condensed version of the lettering for signage along with accompanying versions for use in printed matter and online.

See also https://www.strathpefferjunction.com/british-railway-typefaces-fonts/

So ... http://www.newrailalphabet.co.uk is no longer "new" or even current and

I'm searching for a download of Rail Alphabet 2 ...
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1936


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2021, 12:04:58 »

Margaret Calvert is still around. There was an exhibition of her work at the Design Museum ending at the beginning of this year.

Can't see any Rail Alphabet in the shop. They do tend to considered commercial assets. But for those of you who having been saving their money over lockdown:

https://designmuseumshop.com/products/british-rail-corporate-identity-manual?_pos=10&_sid=58173ebba&_ss=r

I'm not sure I have that sort of money slushing about, but it would be interesting to see how it compares with the British Airposts signage manual by Kinnear and Calvert, and of course the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) Traffic Signs Manual based on their design as well.
Logged
Red Squirrel
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 5215


There are some who call me... Tim


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2021, 12:54:09 »

I can't see any reason to think there will be a return to the drudgery of a national 'corporate identity' livery. Who would want that?

Enforcing the use of a good legible font for all signage makes sense though.
Logged

Things take longer to happen than you think they will, and then they happen faster than you thought they could.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: May 20, 2021, 13:05:36 »

I can't see any reason to think there will be a return to the drudgery of a national 'corporate identity' livery. Who would want that?

Enforcing the use of a good legible font for all signage makes sense though.

As I said in another thread, it will be a suite of Union Jack livery variants at the very least, I reckon. You may be underestimating the desire of politicians to project the post-Brexit New Britain image on that front.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: May 20, 2021, 13:38:40 »

…Enforcing the use of a good legible font for all signage makes sense though.
It was tried not too long ago, with the Chris Green “better stations” report to DfT» (Department for Transport - about), about 2010. 

SWT (South West Trains)’s white on dark blue signage period was a near equivalent to what was proposed nationally, but from what I can remember the report’s recommendations were never actioned.

Paul
Logged
PrestburyRoad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 195


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: May 20, 2021, 14:24:34 »

My four priorities for font and signs are simple: legible, legible, elegant and legible.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7170


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: May 20, 2021, 16:23:01 »

…Enforcing the use of a good legible font for all signage makes sense though.
It was tried not too long ago, with the Chris Green “better stations” report to DfT» (Department for Transport - about), about 2010. 

SWT (South West Trains)’s white on dark blue signage period was a near equivalent to what was proposed nationally, but from what I can remember the report’s recommendations were never actioned.

Paul

That report did call for station name signs in a common national style, but didn't mention other (route-finding) station signage. Maybe at that date hardly any TOCs (Train Operating Company) had altered this, but in any case they had no right to do so!

This all came up on the forum after GWR (Great Western Railway) tarted up the signage at Chippenham. I then found a requirement in GWR's "franchise" agreement to follow the "Design Standards for Accessible Railway Stations: A Joint Code of Practice". That says:
Quote
Research into legibility has led to the design of a number of typefaces that are used by the transport industry. Clear typefaces include Helvetica, Arial, Rail Alphabet, Brunel, New Johnston and Airport. Over-stylised designs and ornate typefaces should be avoided.

I did try interesting ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) in enforcing it (not knowing how this task was shared with DfT), but got a brush-off - so a more formal approach to both would be needed. I also tried an e-mail to RNIB» (Royal National Institute for the Blind - about) campaigns, with not even a reply. So maybe now I don't need to ... perhaps ...

Actually, in 2019, DfT, TS, and ORR together wrote to all TOCs pointing out there was a broader licence condition that said the same thing:
Quote
Condition 5 of the Station and Passenger licence: Statement of National Regulatory Provisions (SNRP)

The purpose of this letter is to remind licence holders as to their obligations under Condition 5 of the Station and Passenger licence: Statement of National Regulatory Provisions (SNRP).

Under this condition the licence holder must establish and comply with a statement of policy and detailed body of arrangements, procedures, services and other benefits to be implemented or provided by the licence holder designed to protect the interest of people with disabilities (together the DPPP» (Disabled People's Protection Policy - see here)).
This letter focuses on the obligation for licence holders when establishing or making changes to their DPPPs to:
"have due regard to the code of practice published by the Secretary of State pursuant to section 71 B of the Act ... " (the Code).

The Code

The Code is a detailed document that ensures that any infrastructure work at stations is carried out in recognition of accessibility needs. It applies at the point at which a licence holder installs, renews or replaces infrastructure or facilities. The latest version of the Code 'Design Standards or Accessible Railway Stations', March 201 5 can be found at https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/.system/up!oads/attachment data/file/425977/design-standards-accessible-stations.pdf].

They were thinking about building works, but the guide covers a lot more than that.
Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18921



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: May 20, 2021, 16:35:27 »

My four priorities for font and signs are simple: legible, legible, elegant and legible.

Something like this then?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_Alphabet
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5410



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: May 20, 2021, 16:47:50 »

My four priorities for font and signs are simple: legible, legible, elegant and legible.

Something like this then?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rail_Alphabet

Hopefully EXACTLY that, thereby not wasting time and money on developing an alternative.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: May 20, 2021, 20:52:54 »

It's legible but I don't think it's anywhere near elegant. However, three out of four ain't bad...  Smiley
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18921



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 20, 2021, 21:31:34 »

I think there can be elegance in a good legible typeface. With BR (British Rail(ways)) it wasn't just the alphabet and numerals. There were the associated pictograms and other signage. There's a simple elegance to the whole BR corporate identity.

For those interest in such things there's a fascinating website with a great deal of information on the design of the British Rail corporate identity and the Rail Alphabet typeface.

http://www.doublearrow.co.uk/
« Last Edit: May 21, 2021, 07:17:16 by bignosemac » Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: May 21, 2021, 14:13:10 »

Any guesses as to how much money all this rebranding (new signage, uniforms, liveries, marketing...) would/will cost us?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5410



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: May 21, 2021, 15:15:08 »

Any guesses as to how much money all this rebranding (new signage, uniforms, liveries, marketing...) would/will cost us?

Unknown, but HOPEFULLY not too much if the rebranding is only applied when renewals are needed in any case.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7798



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: May 21, 2021, 16:32:24 »

Any guesses as to how much money all this rebranding (new signage, uniforms, liveries, marketing...) would/will cost us?

Well, we all know Oooooooooooooooo's gonna pay for it!  Roll Eyes
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: May 21, 2021, 16:40:22 »

Any guesses as to how much money all this rebranding (new signage, uniforms, liveries, marketing...) would/will cost us?

Well, we all know Oooooooooooooooo's gonna pay for it!  Roll Eyes

Well, if you want to know ooooooooowww much you goooooonnna pay for it, then here's a handy guide - https://www.phoenix-paints.co.uk/products/precisionrailway/sectorisation
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page