Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 29 Mar 2024
* Delays at Dover as millions begin Easter getaway
* A view from inside ship that hit Baltimore bridge
- Attempted murder charge after man stabbed on train
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
15:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
15:28 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
15:50 Bedwyn to Newbury
15:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:15 Newbury to Bedwyn
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
16:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
17:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:02 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
13:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
13:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
13:55 Paignton to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:28 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
10:20 Penzance to London Paddington
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
12:15 Penzance to London Paddington
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
13:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
13:50 London Paddington to Great Malvern
14:03 London Paddington to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
17:29 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
etc
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 15:40:52 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[211] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
[66] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[49] Who needs a travel agent these days?
[36] Travel for free on the m2 metrobus - Bristol - 4,5,6 April 202...
[28] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[26] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Populations of towns campaigning for improvements, and some comparisons  (Read 5346 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« on: April 19, 2008, 13:04:40 »

I'm working on some TransWilts population / passenger flow stuff at the moment ... of course one of the factors involved in how busy a service will be / how much call there is for it is the size of the local population.  I thought that folks here might find the following interesting. I've tried to include all towns which the been given serious mention in this section of the site, including those such as Stone and Avonmouth who have seen or have promise of improvement, and those such as Melksham and Okehampton which have suffered cutbacks.

Some populations from the 2001 census

34000 Barnstaple
33000 Exmouth
25000 Maesteg
22000 Evesham
21000 Norton / Radstock
21000 Falmouth
20000 Melksham
19000 Newquay
17000 Portishead
14000 Stone
14000 Marlow
12000 Corsham
12000 Avonmouth
12000 Aberystwyth
11000 Tavistock
11000 Henley-on-Thames
10000 Helston
7000 Pembroke
6000 Okehampton
5000 Looe
3000 Moreton-in-Marsh
2000 Gunnislake

I could add strings of provisos, ifs and buts  - but it makes interesting reading. Please feel free to add any other places!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
John R
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 4416


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 19, 2008, 17:26:55 »

Of course, the geography of where a place is, in particular with relation to the existing rail network and other centres of population, is key. So a town with 10,000 inhabitants is much more likely to get a service if a) its on an existing line or b) it's on a closed or freight line which doesn't involve reopening to passenger traffic a sizeable length of route, than if it is 30 miles from anywhere.

Come to think of it, both Melksham and Portishead fit those criteria.
Logged
Chris from Nailsea
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 17865


I am not railway staff


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: April 19, 2008, 23:42:39 »

A very good point, John: Melksham, with a population of 20,000 and Portishead (now actually 18,000, apparently - see http://www.portishead.gov.uk/about-portishead/aboutportishead.htm ) would certainly benefit from a proper railway service!

 Huh
« Last Edit: April 20, 2008, 00:57:31 by chris from nailsea » Logged

William Huskisson MP (Member of Parliament) was the first person to be killed by a train while crossing the tracks, in 1830.  Many more have died in the same way since then.  Don't take a chance: stop, look, listen.

"Level crossings are safe, unless they are used in an unsafe manner."  Discuss.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40692



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #3 on: April 20, 2008, 07:45:13 »

Many (most?) of those populations have grown in the 8 years since 2001. My home town has grown 20%, and there's approval for another750 houses to be built soon, plus a further 150 hectares earmarked; so 20000 has become (now) around 23000 and that will rise to around 32000 within the time frame of the Regional Spatial Strategty which has some 18 years to run.   You only have to see the new housing development around the station.

2005:

2008:


I chose to quote the figures from a comparable source, rather than trying to update figures
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Karl
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 123


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 20, 2008, 15:57:30 »

Afternoon

Since 2001 there has been some considerable
growth of Falmouth, so reaching somewhere
nearer to Maesteg; probably c25.000.

Although we all need a home whether that be
afforable or not, the one thing that narks me off
is that they have to build it all over railway
land, disused and sometimes not.  Then esspecially
in the case of disused, they realise that
traffic is a problem and growth is ripe and a
railway/station is needed, but they can't do
because someones developed the site of the railway
land.  A case is The "Bodmin and Wenford Rly",
they want to get into Wadebridge, but would need
to create a diversion off the original ine, then
build a brand new station all because someone thought
it was a good idea put a housing development on the
site.  Why?  Could they built it somewhere else?
The same now for the "Helston Railway" project.

I think the sale of railway shouldn't be done, it
should be kept open in case there is a need in the
future for either train or light rail system; or
even if its frieght only.  They are too many cars
and HGVs on our roads anyway.

Go and Google disused stations (the sub brit site),
this may work: http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/stations.shtml
and look at some of the things we have lost to
development.

Sorry if this has wayed slightly off the original
subject.

Regards

Karl.
Logged
Karl
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 123


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 20, 2008, 17:19:03 »

Hello again

Correct link for subbrit website is;

http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/stations/sites.shtml

This should take you straight to the list of
stations on the database.  The list is always
growing, probably the best website to date for
out of way never recorded stations and pictures!

Regards

Karl.
 
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 20, 2008, 21:09:00 »

Afternoon

Since 2001 there has been some considerable
growth of Falmouth, so reaching somewhere
nearer to Maesteg; probably c25.000.

Although we all need a home whether that be
afforable or not, the one thing that narks me off
is that they have to build it all over railway
land, disused and sometimes not.  Then esspecially
in the case of disused, they realise that
traffic is a problem and growth is ripe and a
railway/station is needed, but they can't do
because someones developed the site of the railway
land.  A case is The "Bodmin and Wenford Rly",
they want to get into Wadebridge, but would need
to create a diversion off the original ine, then
build a brand new station all because someone thought
it was a good idea put a housing development on the
site.  Why?  Could they built it somewhere else?
The same now for the "Helston Railway" project.

I think the sale of railway shouldn't be done, it
should be kept open in case there is a need in the
future for either train or light rail system; or
even if its frieght only.  They are too many cars
and HGVs on our roads anyway.

Go and Google disused stations (the sub brit site),
this may work: http://www.subbrit.org.uk/sb-sites/stations.shtml
and look at some of the things we have lost to
development.

Sorry if this has wayed slightly off the original
subject.

Regards

Karl.


Totally agree, Karl F-O-P. In the case of Helston, the last half mile of the branch has been 'redeveloped' but most of the trackbed over that distance is not under housing but under a very wide road and then a playing field. At Wadebridge the case is more severe; what's doubly agonising is that Wadebridge closed to freight so much more recently.
 
   
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page