Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 08 Dec 2023
- Wind and rain expected to bring weekend travel disruption
- Rail passengers stuck for hours in 'surreal' ordeal
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 10/12/23 - Winter Timetable starts
14/12/23 - Estimates of station usage: Ap
24/12/23 - Paddington closed
25/12/23 - No GWR trains

On this day
8th Dec (2013)
Restoration of useable service through Melksham (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:18 Hereford to London Paddington
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:55 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
16:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:11 Taunton to Cardiff Central
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 Liskeard to Looe
18:02 Oxford to London Paddington
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:10 Taunton to Cardiff Central
18:23 London Paddington to Banbury
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:30 Looe to Liskeard
18:30 Plymouth to Penzance
18:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
19:00 Liskeard to Looe
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:15 Penzance to Bristol Temple Meads
19:20 Reading to Redhill
19:30 Looe to Liskeard
Additional 19:35 Westbury to Salisbury
19:45 Banbury to London Paddington
19:58 Cardiff Central to Taunton
20:01 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:05 Liskeard to Looe
20:06 Westbury to Cheltenham Spa
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:14 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:37 Looe to Liskeard
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:00 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
21:05 Liskeard to Looe
21:11 Gloucester to Bristol Temple Meads
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
21:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
21:37 Looe to Liskeard
22:16 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
22:24 Plymouth to Exeter St Davids
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
22:44 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
23:42 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
09/12/23 06:27 Plymouth to Gunnislake
09/12/23 07:16 Gunnislake to Plymouth
09/12/23 08:22 Plymouth to Gunnislake
09/12/23 09:14 Gunnislake to Plymouth
Short Run
13:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:00 Cardiff Central to Penzance
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:50 Penzance to Gloucester
16:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
16:28 London Paddington to Taunton
16:31 London Paddington to Cheltenham Spa
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:00 Cardiff Central to Taunton
17:01 Severn Beach to Salisbury
17:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
17:40 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
17:51 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
17:55 Worcester Shrub Hill to Bristol Temple Meads
17:59 Cheltenham Spa to London Paddington
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
18:04 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
18:10 Gloucester to Westbury
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
18:20 London Paddington to Didcot Parkway
etc
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 08, 2023, 06:37:44 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Network Rail is failing.
[90] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[73] A new era dawns on the TransWilts - 08 Dec 13
[48] Annoying / amusing use of completely irrelevant stock photos t...
[36] Climate protests in Bristol
[34] County Cricket on the move from Bristol?
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Pacers are no more.  (Read 7801 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 6998


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 03, 2021, 11:23:13 pm »

This does not look like anything other than an early days start up - it shares its office address with Startford upon Avon Citizens Advice Bureau.

Could there be something more useful if they were designed to be two car units, with perhaps a capacity of 120+ (assuming that space released by deleting inner cabs is released for seats)?

We'll know that it's a chimera when the next Go-op proposal is for them to be used on their next wishful route proposal..........

More relevantly, the address is that of loads of companies linked to Rupert Symons, a patent agent, and  director of VLR Technologies Ltd. All the real work will be done in the various collaborating companies, which are:
    TDI
    EVERSHOLT RAIL
    WMG
    CUMMINS
    RDM GROUP
    TRANSCAL
    RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board)
    PROSE

Eversholt talk as if they expect to buy the final product in numbers, but describe the first one as a demonstrator - so we still don't know how close they think that is to a real product. Cummins's presence may explain the use of diesel power, though perhaps not the lack of future decarbonic alternatives. They (Cummins) are thinking quite hard about their strategy in this area, though seem to be uncertain as to what will work in trains in the future. 
 
« Last Edit: June 08, 2021, 06:00:28 pm by stuving » Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 08, 2021, 03:31:23 pm »

I can the merit in lightweight bus-like rail vehicles for secondary routes, including commuter services on the Minehead branch and similar places.
Toilets are in my view a requirement even for very short journeys, and that in turn means a disabled toilet, which suggests the need for either two vehicles or a long and articulated vehicle.

I appreciate that most buses do not have toilets, but bus passengers can alight to relieve themselves, whereas the policy on trains is "keep them on the trains no matter what" Remember the Lewisham stranding and the appalling conditions suffered by victims on board trains "that don't need toilets for journeys of less than 30 minutes"

With the concerns about climate change, I agree that we should not be building any more rail vehicles with diesel engines, with the possible exception of nominally electric vehicles with a small diesel engine for use when the wires come down.
Battery power is now a realistic alternative.
« Last Edit: June 08, 2021, 09:16:28 pm by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
jamestheredengine
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 285


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 09, 2021, 08:31:00 pm »

I can the merit in lightweight bus-like rail vehicles for secondary routes
The problem is that so many of the obvious routes for this sort of thing were shut down in the 60s. Neath Riverside to Hereford via Brecon is the one that immediately springs to mind for me. I'd quite enjoy a ride up to Brecon or Hay in something like that.
Logged

Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: June 09, 2021, 08:50:33 pm »

Toilets are in my view a requirement even for very short journeys, and that in turn means a disabled toilet, which suggests the need for either two vehicles or a long and articulated vehicle.
I agree on the need for toilets. However, I question whether that means a need for two vehicles. It's not a case of "toilet" and "disabled toilet"; a toilet accessible to the disabled will also be accessible to the abled. The rail-bus simply needs to be a reasonable size to have one toilet accessible to all, and many or most coaches manage this in a length of 12 metres, so it shouldn't be a problem.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 39971



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #19 on: June 09, 2021, 09:18:01 pm »

I can the merit in lightweight bus-like rail vehicles for secondary routes
The problem is that so many of the obvious routes for this sort of thing were shut down in the 60s. Neath Riverside to Hereford via Brecon is the one that immediately springs to mind for me. I'd quite enjoy a ride up to Brecon or Hay in something like that.

I worry about routes that only support single vehicle trains - the Bubble cars used to be known as "Coffin Nails" because the next step was closure.  But I am VERY thankful for the 153s that ran on the TransWilts for a handful of years until our traffic outgrew them.

Wouldn't it be lovely to see some re-openings in Wales - and some growth on existing lines - but really the aspiration should be a traffic level to require trains of 2 carriages at least.   I'm noting that Prof Stuart Cole, who knows a thing or four about trains and buses, advocates a rise to a two hourly service on the Heart of Wales, and with something at least twice as long as a 153.

As part routes providing the outer end, or where multiple routes fan out, there might just be a place for these - Swansea to Clarbeston Road where the hourly train divides, portions to Fishguard, Milford Haven and Neyland perhaps?
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TonyN
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 461



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: October 09, 2021, 03:10:48 pm »

The RLVR vehicle now has a Demonstrator setup at Ironbridge.

https://transportdesigninternational.com/launching-revolution-very-light-rail-rvlr/
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4398


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 09, 2021, 07:53:16 pm »

The RLVR vehicle now has a Demonstrator setup at Ironbridge.

https://transportdesigninternational.com/launching-revolution-very-light-rail-rvlr/

What is its crash resistance like?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4251


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: October 10, 2021, 07:51:26 am »

The RLVR vehicle now has a Demonstrator setup at Ironbridge.

https://transportdesigninternational.com/launching-revolution-very-light-rail-rvlr/

What is its crash resistance like?

As it has RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board), DfT» (Department for Transport - about) backing I would expect it to be fully compliant.
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4398


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: October 10, 2021, 08:19:37 am »

The RLVR vehicle now has a Demonstrator setup at Ironbridge.

https://transportdesigninternational.com/launching-revolution-very-light-rail-rvlr/

What is its crash resistance like?

As it has RSSB (Rail Safety and Standards Board), DfT» (Department for Transport - about) backing I would expect it to be fully compliant.

Compliant with what standard?

What I meant was - does being a very light rail mean there is a reduced requirement for crash resistance or is it expected to acheive the same as heavy rail?
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 6998


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: October 10, 2021, 11:21:56 am »

Compliant with what standard?

What I meant was - does being a very light rail mean there is a reduced requirement for crash resistance or is it expected to acheive the same as heavy rail?

They seem to have ducked that question. As a demonstrator it can be made without formal requirements in all areas, on a "lets see how far we can go with the innovative bits" basis. The trials are planned to use "a segregated alignment (a route protected from interaction with roads, cars and other traffic)". I note that the design includes actual buffers, no doubt to put some explicit energy absorption mechanism into a composite structure that provides very little implicitly.

Going back to the subject of bogies, not resolved earlier on, they are not using any fancy new carbon-fibre ones. That was a parallel project with its own timescale and timescale risks, so I can see they would not want to be coupled to it. If that works it would no doubt give a further weight reduction.

They are in fact using the LN25 bogie, which is basically the same old TF25 bogie used on big goods wagons since 2001. It's made by Axiom, originally Powell Duffryn rail and now part of Wabtec Faively. So I don't imagine it's at all light, even before they attached motors and/or couplings to it.
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2178


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: September 15, 2022, 06:36:28 pm »

As a quick update on the Pacers in preservation, it seems that the units that went to the Wensleydale Railway have now been purchased by the Weardale railway.  A few more details below.

https://www.railadvent.co.uk/2022/09/weardale-railway-purchases-wensleydale-railway-based-class-142-pacer-train.html
Logged
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1193


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: September 16, 2022, 07:47:23 am »

What would be the cost of buying these units?
Logged
johnneyw
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2178


From station to station, back to Bristol city....


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: September 16, 2022, 11:21:32 pm »

What would be the cost of buying these units?

I don't know if the Weardale railway website has any details on this but it might appear later in their published annual accounts.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page