Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:15 28 Mar 2024
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
* Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Formal end to carrying coffins by BR (link)

Train RunningCancelled
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:48 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:04 Bristol Temple Meads to Filton Abbey Wood
18:04 Bedwyn to Newbury
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:26 Newbury to Bedwyn
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
14:49 Plymouth to Cardiff Central
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:30 Warminster to Bristol Temple Meads
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:18 Newbury to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
14:36 London Paddington to Paignton
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
17:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 18:25 Shalford to Reading
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 18:17:14 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: RMT threatens action on pay  (Read 1541 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« on: June 18, 2021, 00:59:26 »

From the Morning Star

Quote
TRANSPORT union RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) has pledged an industry-wide campaign of co-ordinated industrial action to smash through the government’s pay freeze.

Privateer train-operators Network Rail and Transport for London were among employers notified by unions today that workers who helped keep the economy moving throughout the pandemic will not accept real-terms pay cuts.

RMT’s “Bust the transport worker pay freeze” campaign was launched as its research revealed that private rail companies alone were syphoning more than £570 million a year from the industry in profits, as inflation rose to 2.1 per cent.

The union said it had moved onto a “dispute footing” with every employer seeking to impose a freeze or minimal pay rises and emphasised that it would campaign alongside other unions against “workplace austerity.”
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2021, 07:57:12 »

From the Morning Star

Quote
TRANSPORT union RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) has pledged an industry-wide campaign of co-ordinated industrial action to smash through the government’s pay freeze.

Privateer train-operators Network Rail and Transport for London were among employers notified by unions today that workers who helped keep the economy moving throughout the pandemic will not accept real-terms pay cuts.

RMT’s “Bust the transport worker pay freeze” campaign was launched as its research revealed that private rail companies alone were syphoning more than £570 million a year from the industry in profits, as inflation rose to 2.1 per cent.

The union said it had moved onto a “dispute footing” with every employer seeking to impose a freeze or minimal pay rises and emphasised that it would campaign alongside other unions against “workplace austerity.”

It reads better if you whistle the "Internationale" at the same time  Roll Eyes
Logged
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 783


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2021, 08:48:02 »

'Privateer train-operators'? Have the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) not noticed that the environment in which their members are employed has changed somewhat?
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 18, 2021, 09:36:17 »

'Privateer train-operators'? Have the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) not noticed that the environment in which their members are employed has changed somewhat?

To be fair to the bruvvers, isn't that the Morning Star chucking in a bit of gratuitous Soviet style rhetoric rather than the Union?
Logged
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: June 18, 2021, 10:15:22 »

'Privateer train-operators'? Have the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) not noticed that the environment in which their members are employed has changed somewhat?

It's interesting - Firstly I must point out that I am happy to admit that first under Andrew Haines, and then up to the present day Mark Hopwood, GWR (Great Western Railway) has improved out of all recognition since the shambles that was mid-2000s FGW (First Great Western). However, this does remind me of a conversation I once had with an FGW executive of that era, who when asked why the fares under FGW control had been whacked up on a certain line despite the shocking service on offer at the time, replied "because that's what a marketeer would do". "Marketeer" vs "Privateer", you say potato, I say potato?

I guess it all depends on whether you think things run better that way or not - The Morning Star and RMT clearly think not, but others would obviously disagree.

Similarly, the soon to be GBR (Great British Railways)-rebranded Network Rail is about to get into the business of train service specification and fare-setting, and will be letting out concessions to companies that will still be private and will still be train operators.

Will that make Network Rail a "Privateer train-operator" ? The Morning Star clearly thinks so, but others would obviously disagree.

I guess it all depends on whether you think things  are going to run better that way or not. People like me clearly have their doubts, but others think the second coming is just round the corner.

We will only find out for sure once the GBR system is up and running.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 18, 2021, 11:01:42 »

'Privateer train-operators'? Have the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) not noticed that the environment in which their members are employed has changed somewhat?

It's interesting - Firstly I must point out that I am happy to admit that first under Andrew Haines, and then up to the present day Mark Hopwood, GWR (Great Western Railway) has improved out of all recognition since the shambles that was mid-2000s FGW (First Great Western). However, this does remind me of a conversation I once had with an FGW executive of that era, who when asked why the fares under FGW control had been whacked up on a certain line despite the shocking service on offer at the time, replied "because that's what a marketeer would do". "Marketeer" vs "Privateer", you say potato, I say potato?

I guess it all depends on whether you think things run better that way or not - The Morning Star and RMT clearly think not, but others would obviously disagree.

Similarly, the soon to be GBR (Great British Railways)-rebranded Network Rail is about to get into the business of train service specification and fare-setting, and will be letting out concessions to companies that will still be private and will still be train operators.

Will that make Network Rail a "Privateer train-operator" ? The Morning Star clearly thinks so, but others would obviously disagree.

I guess it all depends on whether you think things  are going to run better that way or not. People like me clearly have their doubts, but others think the second coming is just round the corner.

We will only find out for sure once the GBR system is up and running.

It's worth bearing in mind that the Morning Star follows the line of the British Communist Party (what's left of it) and has a tiny, tiny circulation - even smaller since the Soviet Union cancelled their bulk order which pretty much kept it afloat - even now it only keeps going thanks to Trade Unions and activists.

It's quite amusing to ponder its occasional outbursts, but they're not really to be taken seriously.

If you read Private Eye, think Dave Spart.
Logged
eightonedee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1532



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 18, 2021, 12:54:51 »

I think Bob Blakey has hit the nail on the head.

It is becoming clear, I think, that the transport sector may actually be the biggest loser from the Covid pandemic, notwithstanding the protests of leisure and hospitality. At least when Covid is conquered, or we have a new normal that enables us to live with it at an acceptable level, people will want to get back to eating out, going to meet up with their friends, going on holiday, going to sports fixtures etc, and there is likely to be a somewhat smaller high street shopping sector, more focused on the shopping experience, after the pandemic accelerated a shake out that was already under way.

It is clear that the fall off in passenger numbers has been catastrophic, but also that the signs are that there may now be a substantial shift in working patterns that may not fully reverse. There will also be a proportion of the public for whom travel by public transport will mean "exposure to risk of illness" and who will avoid its use for leisure and recreation, whatever the statistics say. This means that capacity requirements, and fare revenues might be impacted considerably. Cynically, I expect that the users of public transport will be seen as a less important part of the electorate to mollify, which could cancel out any growth in supporting public transport on environmental grounds (or wanting to be seen to support it). I cannot see anything other than the return to cost control impacting on public transport investment.

I understand that those in the railway industry who have skills in short supply have enjoyed some good years when it comes to pay (and good luck to them too). But if there is now no shortage of drivers and other staff, whatever the colour of the politics of the government there will not be support for increased pay, and a campaign of industrial action will only further harm the prospects of any recovery in passenger numbers and in the industry as a whole - who wants to take a train that is not running? Who wants to book a holiday by train if there is a risk that there might be a day of "industrial (in)action" when you want to go or come back? Ray Buckton, this is not your hour!
Logged
GBM
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1468


View Profile Email
« Reply #7 on: June 18, 2021, 13:40:58 »


I understand that those in the railway industry who have skills in short supply have enjoyed some good years when it comes to pay (and good luck to them too). But if there is now no shortage of drivers and other staff, ............

Still a few local services cancelled by crewing deficits.
Logged

Personal opinion only.  Writings not representative of any union, collective, management or employer. (Think that absolves me...........)
Sixty3Closure
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 501


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: June 21, 2021, 23:02:27 »

They're already taking industrial action in Scotland

https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/next-phase-of-strike-action-goes-ahead-on-scotrail/

I'm not entirely sure what about which is never a good sign. As eightonedee says reducing the service to protest about the governments inaction about improving services seems a bit counter intuitive.

Logged
a-driver
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 965


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: June 23, 2021, 20:06:41 »

They're already taking industrial action in Scotland

https://www.rmt.org.uk/news/next-phase-of-strike-action-goes-ahead-on-scotrail/

I'm not entirely sure what about which is never a good sign. As eightonedee says reducing the service to protest about the governments inaction about improving services seems a bit counter intuitive.



And with both ScotRail and Transport for Scotland not interested in resolving the dispute I would have thought the message is loud and clear. 

I think the RMT (National Union of Rail, Maritime & Transport Workers) have had it very good for a long while but despite the pandemic, I think they believe they can call all the shots.  As someone posted earlier, times have certainly changed.  They would be wise to try and encourage passengers back to the railway, not to drive them further away. 
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page