Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 19:35 28 Mar 2024
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Passengers pleaded with knifeman during attack
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:57 London Paddington to Worcester Foregate Street
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
18:08 London Paddington to Frome
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:23 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
19:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
20:16 Frome to Westbury
20:49 Newbury to Bedwyn
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:16 Bedwyn to Newbury
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
15:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:19 Carmarthen to London Paddington
16:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
16:35 London Paddington to Plymouth
16:50 Plymouth to London Paddington
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:30 London Paddington to Taunton
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
17:50 Gloucester to Salisbury
18:19 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
18:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
19:06 London Paddington to Bedwyn
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
19:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
Delayed
13:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
14:15 Penzance to London Paddington
16:03 London Paddington to Penzance
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:17 Exeter St Davids to Penzance
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:59 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 19:43:36 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[133] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[132] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[53] Return of the BRUTE?
[44] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[32] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: Changes to the Highway Code  (Read 5684 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 9809



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: August 08, 2021, 11:48:57 »

Whatever next, annual MOT examinations for the horse !

Can see it now: Advisory: Nearside rear horseshoe getting near legal limit  Grin
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: August 08, 2021, 15:37:25 »

There's been a lot of misleading phrases used in connection with these announcements. One was that "vehicles going straight on would always have priority", implying radical and complicated changes to junction procedures. In fact it refers to the specific case of turning into. but not out of, a side road; the idea is to let pedestrians wanting to cross the road, as well as cyclists going straight on, do so with precedence over the vehicle turning into the side road.

These phrases have appeared in many different places, so it would seem the confusion arises with DfT» (Department for Transport - about) not journalists. Perhaps it's time we stopped using the word "priority" in traffic situations and adopted more specific words.

Ever the pedant, I can see scope for more confusion - and most people won't bother to ponder what is meant. I've long had the vague idea that a pedestrian already crossing a road had priority and a stronger view that so had a cyclist going straight on.

But will "pedestrians wanting to cross the road" really have priority? If when I'm in a car I'm about to turn left into a side road and I see a pedestrian waiting on the pavement, do I brake to a halt to allow them to cross. I can't see that going down well with drivers behind me!

(A couple of months ago, I was walking along Oxford Road in Reading and paused to cross over the entrance to Waitrose. When driving into the supermarket, I twitch a little about cars close behind as one needs to slow right down to negotiate the 180-degree turn, and I was a little startled when a lady driver turning in to the car park stopped to allow me to cross - with the rear of her car sticking out into the main road.)
Depends how it's implemented. I think the idea is that pedestrians won't "want" to cross the road, they'll simply walk. Like you, I don't think this will work in practice.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #17 on: August 09, 2021, 00:39:04 »

I doubt that the new wording will make that much difference, but even a small change in emphasis is still a step in the right direction. For far too long motorists have believed that they, and only they, have a right to use the roads.

BTW (by the way), a neighbour of mine regularly uses his horse drawn cart when a riding horse might be more suitable. The reason being that car drivers HAVE to allow space for a large cart, but drive too fast and too close to a horse being ridden.
The cart is also safer after dark as it is equipped with good lights.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: August 09, 2021, 06:47:46 »

I doubt that the new wording will make that much difference, but even a small change in emphasis is still a step in the right direction. For far too long motorists have believed that they, and only they, have a right to use the roads.

BTW (by the way), a neighbour of mine regularly uses his horse drawn cart when a riding horse might be more suitable. The reason being that car drivers HAVE to allow space for a large cart, but drive too fast and too close to a horse being ridden.
The cart is also safer after dark as it is equipped with good lights.

I don't doubt that SOME motorists believe they own the road, in the same way as some cyclists and some pedestrians (and some horse and cart drivers I'm sure) leave a lot to be desired in their behaviour, but by no means all in any category.

One of the difficulties with this debate and the issues around it (particularly when it comes to cyclists/motorists) is that it tends to take place with generalisations/absolutes as you've demonstrated, with each side having very little empathy for the other.
Logged
CyclingSid
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: August 09, 2021, 06:55:31 »

Quote
Whatever next, annual MOT examinations for the horse !
I think there should be "Poop and scoop" for horses", not sure whether
Quote
Advisory: Nearside rear horseshoe getting near legal limit
would apply.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #20 on: August 09, 2021, 07:12:37 »

Quote
Whatever next, annual MOT examinations for the horse !
I think there should be "Poop and scoop" for horses", not sure whether

I have had it explained to me that horses are vegetarian, and so produce a cleaner and more natural solid waste product than dogs which are supposed to be carnivores but in practice eat a mixture of meat and veg.  I don't recall if that explanation came from a horse rider who may have had an interest in justifying their behaviour - "oy, matey, aren't you going to clean up your sh*t"  or from someone with a more scientific background.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: August 09, 2021, 07:23:47 »

Quote
Whatever next, annual MOT examinations for the horse !
I think there should be "Poop and scoop" for horses", not sure whether

I have had it explained to me that horses are vegetarian, and so produce a cleaner and more natural solid waste product than dogs which are supposed to be carnivores but in practice eat a mixture of meat and veg.  I don't recall if that explanation came from a horse rider who may have had an interest in justifying their behaviour - "oy, matey, aren't you going to clean up your sh*t"  or from someone with a more scientific background.

I'm really enjoying my breakfast!  Smiley
Logged
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 689


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: August 09, 2021, 09:28:37 »

... I don't doubt that SOME motorists believe they own the road, in the same way as some cyclists and some pedestrians (and some horse and cart drivers I'm sure) leave a lot to be desired in their behaviour, but by no means all in any category.

One of the difficulties with this debate and the issues around it (particularly when it comes to cyclists/motorists) is that it tends to take place with generalisations/absolutes as you've demonstrated, with each side having very little empathy for the other.

As someone who cycled 250,000+ miles, I should be less prejudiced than some about cyclists, but I'm still cross about an incident last week when I was driving with care down a steep hill with a sharp bend at the bottom that I know to be tricky. As I went around the bend, I saw there was a dustcart stopped on my side with operatives collecting and emptying bins. I slowed down and squeezed through carefully, only to get an angry shout behind from a cyclist who had been speeding down the hill. I then had to pause at two road junctions, where he continued his tirade.

He didn't look the sort of person who would entertain these points:

1. He was going too fast to stop safely;
2. Under the imminent guidance, the bin operatives in the road had priority over him (and me);
3. Had there been an oncoming vehicle that entailed my stopping behind the dustcart (and even if I hadn't been there at all), his side of the road would be blocked and there would have been a head-on collision at an impact speed of 35+mph. (And he wasn't wearing a helmet, which is another issue, I know).

I can readily recall other idiocy incidents with motorists and pedestrians - but not with horses and their riders!

(Please forgive my self-indulgence in recounting this incident, but I'm still feeling raw about it.)
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: August 09, 2021, 17:56:23 »

Horses have the merit of having a little commonsense of their own, a trick not yet learnt by cycles.
Horses have been known to find their own way home if the rider falls off, sleeps, or is drunk.
It is alleged that horses regularly used in urban areas can understand traffic lights.
A saddled but riderless horse is a cause for concern since the welfare and whereabouts of the rider are unknown.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Marlburian
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 689


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: August 09, 2021, 18:12:10 »

I've noticed that the horses and their handlers at Little Heath Stables on the edge of Tilehurst are usually treated with respect by motorists. It can't be much fun leading a string of horses along a narrowish lane between the stables and a field.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: August 09, 2021, 20:03:21 »

Horses have the merit of having a little commonsense of their own, a trick not yet learnt by cycles.
Horses have been known to find their own way home if the rider falls off, sleeps, or is drunk.
It is alleged that horses regularly used in urban areas can understand traffic lights.
A saddled but riderless horse is a cause for concern since the welfare and whereabouts of the rider are unknown.

Not too much, though. The one that had a go at my car (many years ago) was not responsible for its actions, according to the law, and neither was its rider.

I did all the right things, slowing right down and into first gear, and getting as far off this very narrow road as I could. It would not have helped if I'd stopped, as the two horses were passing me as fast as I was them. Just when the leading beast got alongside it executed a neat (though perhaps not medalworthy) pirouette and pushed its back end through the side window behind me, and then lashed out with its hooves. "Must have been frightened by a rabbit" was the story; and I suspect it always is. 
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: August 09, 2021, 21:47:31 »

Horses have the merit of having a little commonsense of their own, a trick not yet learnt by cycles.
Horses have been known to find their own way home if the rider falls off, sleeps, or is drunk.
It is alleged that horses regularly used in urban areas can understand traffic lights.
A saddled but riderless horse is a cause for concern since the welfare and whereabouts of the rider are unknown.
There's a story that when Stroud's Subscription Rooms (a venue for concerts and similar) were being built in 1833-34, a certain local farmer was in the habit of finishing every market day with a pint or several at the Swan, which is still open in Swan Lane just round the corner from the Sub Rooms (unless Covid has forced it to close down). No matter if he could barely stand and it was dark, his horse knew the way home. One particular market day he had better than usual sales to celebrate, so drank accordingly. Unfortunately what his horse did not know and he was too drunk to notice was that Swan Lane was obstructed by scaffolding for the Sub Rooms then under construction. He and his horse trotted up the ramp to the height of the second storey... and straight off the other end. Horse and rider died.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: August 10, 2021, 04:46:02 »

Poor horse.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: August 10, 2021, 06:04:20 »

I do however wonder if the report is true, or an early urban myth.

Most scaffolding does not have ramps, but uses ladders and hoists.
Most scaffolding has a rather restricted area and often limited headroom also for work or access, not sufficient to allow easy passage for a horse.
I very much doubt that a horse would enter an unfamiliar structure of its own volition.

Also horses have good night vision and would probably not step of a sheer drop.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: August 10, 2021, 10:03:15 »

Perhaps the horse was drunk as well!
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page