Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 21:35 28 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaways hit by travel disruption
- Where Baltimore bridge investigation goes now
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
- Family anger at sentence on fatal crash driver, 19
- Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1992)
MOD Kineton tour, branch line society (*)

Train RunningCancelled
18:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
18:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
19:33 London Paddington to Worcester Shrub Hill
19:35 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
20:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
20:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
20:56 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
21:30 Shalford to Reading
21:53 Newbury to Bedwyn
22:25 Bedwyn to Newbury
22:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
22:47 Newbury to Bedwyn
Short Run
17:03 London Paddington to Penzance
17:36 London Paddington to Plymouth
18:03 London Paddington to Penzance
19:04 Paignton to London Paddington
20:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
20:42 Bedwyn to London Paddington
21:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:20 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
22:10 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:04 Reading to Bedwyn
23:17 Bedwyn to Reading
Delayed
16:15 Penzance to London Paddington
Additional 17:26 Castle Cary to Penzance
19:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
21:30 Gatwick Airport to Reading
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 21:48:56 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[104] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[103] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[78] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[56] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[41] Return of the BRUTE?
[25] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
Author Topic: Call for discounts for railcard users  (Read 11739 times)
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: October 05, 2020, 20:42:18 »

My Senior Railcard was due for renewal 25/03/20, as was my wifes.  Normally we would have expected to receive an e-mail reminder with a link etc.  This year nothing. Something in the system guessed that days out by train were not going to be on our agenda.

There were major problems with the railcard website around the turn of the year, which I do not think were sorted by the time lockdown was announced, so I doubt you would have received a reminder at the time.
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #31 on: October 06, 2020, 16:44:12 »

No extension for railcard holders after lockdown, but safeguarded staff travel card gets three month extension
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: October 06, 2020, 17:05:13 »


I fully support those who think there should be a railcard extension, though this three month safeguarded rail extension isn't quite the same thing.

Passes are issued for use from 1st April every year, and are valid for the following 15 months until 30th June the following year.  The next passes are issued 1st April the following year, so there is a three month overlap of validity.  This change means that the usual three month overlap becomes a six month overlap next year.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
old original
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 877


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: October 06, 2020, 23:04:02 »


I fully support those who think there should be a railcard extension, though this three month safeguarded rail extension isn't quite the same thing.

Passes are issued for use from 1st April every year, and are valid for the following 15 months until 30th June the following year.  The next passes are issued 1st April the following year, so there is a three month overlap of validity.  This change means that the usual three month overlap becomes a six month overlap next year.

...also, although rail travel was for "essential travel only" railcards could still be used whereas the use of the leisure staff passes were suspended.
Logged

8 Billion people on a wet rock - of course we're not happy
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10095


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: October 11, 2020, 18:56:48 »

...and...

The 2019/20 entitlement had no extension, so ran out on 30th June this year during the period usage was barred.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #35 on: May 17, 2021, 05:01:42 »

From Christian Wolmar

Quote
Railcard scam is nothing short of theft by the state

Last week, buying a ticket for my first rail journey in six months, I said to the kindly ticket clerk, ‘I presume that my Senior Railcard will have been extended since I have been barred from using the railway since December?’  The poor woman almost blushed: ‘I’m afraid not. You will have to buy a new one. You are not the first — and you should complain.’

Indeed. There is both a powerful moral and a practical marketing issue here. I discovered that ministers had decided back in September, after the first lockdown, that five million railcard holders would lose their money since they had not been unable to make use of them. The rail companies and Passenger Focus, the statutory body which represents passengers, were furious.

Rightly so. This is actually theft and that is why it is a moral issue. There is no other word for it. If the government bans me from an activity for which I have paid, then it is the government’s responsibility to compensate me. [continues]
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
CyclingSid
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1918


Hockley viaduct


View Profile
« Reply #36 on: May 17, 2021, 08:19:36 »

Quote
moral issue
I think you have the wrong government to think that applies.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #37 on: September 17, 2021, 15:49:10 »

From the Mirror

Quote
Pensioner who couldn't travel due to Covid rules is denied £70 railcard refund

Pensioner Susan Shaw bought a three-year card before the pandemic that government rules meant she couldn't use - now she is unable to get any cash back or an extension

I ... still ... feel that the denial of an either an extension or a refund of some sort sends out the signals "mean" and "immoral" and fails to take up what could have been a marketing opportunity.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1286


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: September 18, 2021, 06:15:53 »

This is another occasion that those in charge should have refunded the amount and then kept quiet.

Now its been in the papers,

stand by for an "error of judgement"

Then their will be refunds for all of those that request their monies back,and sales of senior railcards COULD suffer.

Considering that "mature persons" get off peak bus travel
Logged
PhilWakely
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 2007



View Profile
« Reply #39 on: September 18, 2021, 08:12:58 »

It is a difficult one to get right. Morally, I believe there should have been some sort of compensation. However, to give you an example......

I renewed my Good Lady Wife's [one year] railcard just before the first lockdown and it was not used during the subsequent twelve months as she had no need to use the railway and had no wish to use it out of lockdown because of severe overcrowding on the services she would have used. However, both of us recently celebrated our ruby wedding anniversary by treating ourselves to First Class travel from Exeter to Edinburgh, via London. Our railcards earned us each a saving of significantly more than the cost of a 3-year (let alone a 1-year) railcard on our return journey. So, we have more than made up for lack of use last year.

However, there will be others less fortunate, who bought their railcards just to cover their weekly visit to relatives twenty miles away and would not have been able to do so. They certainly deserve some sort of compensation.
Logged
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7746



View Profile
« Reply #40 on: September 18, 2021, 10:01:54 »

It is a difficult one to get right. Morally, I believe there should have been some sort of compensation. However, to give you an example......

I renewed my Good Lady Wife's [one year] railcard just before the first lockdown and it was not used during the subsequent twelve months as she had no need to use the railway and had no wish to use it out of lockdown because of severe overcrowding on the services she would have used. However, both of us recently celebrated our ruby wedding anniversary by treating ourselves to First Class travel from Exeter to Edinburgh, via London. Our railcards earned us each a saving of significantly more than the cost of a 3-year (let alone a 1-year) railcard on our return journey. So, we have more than made up for lack of use last year.

However, there will be others less fortunate, who bought their railcards just to cover their weekly visit to relatives twenty miles away and would not have been able to do so. They certainly deserve some sort of compensation.

That's the difficulty isn't it?

You couldn't really embark on an exercise to ascertain every individuals circumstances and level of use, it's really got to be all or nothing?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #41 on: September 18, 2021, 21:32:31 »

I am going to disagree with the need to work out how much people would have lost.

In the normal (let's call it positive) direction, it's £30 for one year or £70 for three, irrespective if the holder saved £10 or £1000 - no benefit testing in the fee.   So why are we talking about some sort of benefit testing when we look at the reverse (negative) direction?     The difference in benefit relates not to the standing charge, but to the incremental (34% of fare) element - paid close to the time of travel and not the same issue on refunds.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page