Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
End of through trains
Bristol to Waterloo - Why?

 
Please sign our petition
(more information)
 
Campaign links here
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 16:15 05 Dec 2021
* Covid: Travel changes too late to halt potential new wave - scientist
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 09/12/21 - Award Event - CRN
10/12/21 - Final day, service to Bristol
19/01/22 - MTUG - regular meeting
08/03/22 - WWRUG AGM - B-o-A
Random Image
Train RunningCancelled
13:50 Penzance to Exeter St Davids
14:18 Penzance to London Paddington
15:25 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
20:20 Westbury to Swindon
20:33 Southampton Central to Bristol Temple Meads
21:13 Swindon to Westbury
22:02 Cheltenham Spa to Swindon
23:10 Swindon to Cheltenham Spa
23:13 Cardiff Central to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Southampton Central to Westbury
Short Run
13:32 Southampton Central to Cardiff Central
14:33 Southampton Central to Cardiff Central
15:18 Reading to Gatwick Airport
15:40 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:30 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
17:25 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
17:37 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:25 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
19:33 Southampton Central to Cardiff Central
20:30 Cardiff Central to Southampton Central
20:36 Bristol Temple Meads to Cheltenham Spa
Delayed
05/12/21 13:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 14:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 14:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 15:17 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 15:42 London Paddington to Swansea
15:55 Cardiff Central to Taunton
05/12/21 16:22 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 16:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 17:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 17:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 18:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 19:20 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 19:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 20:19 Swansea to London Paddington
05/12/21 20:42 London Paddington to Swansea
05/12/21 21:42 London Paddington to Swansea
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
December 05, 2021, 04:34:05 pm *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[108] Masks To Become Compulsory On Public Transport Again
[101] Are the railways fit for their (future) purpose?
[70] Through service - Bristol to London (Waterloo) via Trowbridge ...
[56] South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed
[38] Advent quiz - day 3 - unlabelled maps
[20] Overhead Electrification Plans
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 27
  Print  
Author Topic: South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed  (Read 23143 times)
bobm
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 8896



View Profile
« Reply #255 on: October 22, 2021, 08:37:22 pm »

(I have asked for a downloadable copy to share here)

Early version of the Hansard record of the debate is here.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #256 on: October 22, 2021, 09:23:39 pm »

(I have asked for a downloadable copy to share here)

Early version of the Hansard record of the debate is here.

Click on image for the video

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Mark A
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 146


View Profile
« Reply #257 on: October 23, 2021, 09:46:34 am »

Much made of the figure 93% (i.e. SWR» (South Western Railway - about) will return to running 93% of the previous service).

This omits... what should it be called... coverage?

The Bristol to Waterloo is a gross example in that as Graham says, this will be 0% 24/7.

But as someone from the Waterloo - Reading line has observed, they've lost a late train from London, seemingly permanently, so for the passengers needing to return at that time who previously used the train, this is also zero percent provision at that time of the day. (And on the matter of that late train, there's a sort of threshold effect where the last train to London supports an entire range of activities and when it goes, the people who used to use it are now the ones that either drive, or need to leave whatever event they've attended before the end. We've seen those people and we don't like to be those people, though it has to be said that for the people who can switch to using a hotel, this benefits the likes of Premier Inn...)

Perhaps the 24/7 figure for a line may be slightly reduced, but retreats from late or early morning services is a reduction to zero service levels at those times.

And it's the early and late trains that may load lightly, so the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) can put pressure on TOCs (Train Operating Company) to cut them on the same basis that people at the Trowbridge meeting heard about rather too often - to 'Save the taxpayer money'. (It has to be said that a few people glanced at each other, having thought all along that the taxpayer was themselves.)

And, of course... retreat from the margins and eventually, the centre becomes your new margin.

This is probably obvious to many people, but it doesn't make it less alarming that it's happening to parts of the railway network. Now in some ways that would be fine if the Bristol to Waterloo trains were in normal times  moribund but of course they've been shown to be anything but.

Mark
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #258 on: October 24, 2021, 08:11:11 am »

Sharing from my Facebook feed ...

I admit it - bit of a personal marker passed yesterday afternoon when we hit 3,521 signatures on the petition asking The Governement to "Continue to run through trains from Bristol to Waterloo via Trowbridge". It's now got over twice the number of signatures that the only petition I have ever created before did - and that's in about 2 weeks from initial publicity rather than the 3 months it took before. Far more signatures than I had anticipated - my hope was just to equal the previous number from many years ago. THANK YOU if you have signed already. EVERYone counts.

If you have not yet signed, please do so - at https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/598397 . Maybe not a specific "Melksham" topic but very much a West Wilts one, and one - if we let the service cull go ahead without public consultation - would set a dangerous precedent.  It may happen anyway in spite of the screams of anguish, but at the least it will make "them" think next time. It is utter madness to be talking "Bus Back Better" and climate change, and at the same time deleting well used (yes, they are - THAT is why the petition has taken off!) trains.  Read more at http://waterloo.savethetrain.org.uk

Supporting image - a comparison of the GWR (Great Western Railway) service which continues, and the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) service which is set to finish on 10th December 2021 unless something changes late in the day.

Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Mark A
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 146


View Profile
« Reply #259 on: October 24, 2021, 09:25:16 am »

That's a really useful summary: can you sling a PDF version - with the text in it as text, please?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #260 on: October 24, 2021, 09:35:47 am »

That's a really useful summary: can you sling a PDF version - with the text in it as text, please?

Should be at http://www.passenger.chat/cma.pdf
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #261 on: October 25, 2021, 06:27:02 am »

My thanks to Mark A for finding a signatures-by-day graph (here)



Also a graphic from the petition sight showing the geographic spread (here)



And that in numbers (my page from the .json feed) (here]



(Graphic shown above are as of the time of my posting; links will take you to current graphic whenever you view the page)


Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #262 on: October 26, 2021, 04:36:27 pm »

From my post at https://www.facebook.com/groups/221786714693792/posts/1795752640630517/ (it's the "Your Crap Railway Photos" group where you can post pictures not suitable for use elsewere), talking about the axing of the Bristol to Waterloo service.

A poster who's profile places him in London writes
Quote
The reason they're axing it is not a lot of people use it, if they axe it that frees up stock to be used on busier services and there are alternatives !

But a group member from the Bristol area tells him
Quote
That is utter rubbish! Nearly every one of them is at full seated capacity!

Rather confirms the fibbs that are being told out-of-area ... seat occupancy graphs displayed by Andrew Ardley on Wednesday last week (I have asked for but not received a copy of the slides) played with statistics.  They were meant to show a low seat occupancy.  Sadly for SWR» (South Western Railway - about), I know what typical figures are and to me they were showing a reasonable pattern.  Data collected during the SWR strike too, I think, which was hardly going to encourage passengers.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #263 on: October 26, 2021, 09:26:53 pm »

More feedback - just an example

Quote
When I've used it, it's been crushed standing room only. I'll sign.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Lee
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 7477


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #264 on: October 27, 2021, 07:43:10 am »

The petition has just reached 4000 signatures  Smiley
Logged

Vous devez ĂȘtre impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #265 on: October 27, 2021, 08:29:07 am »

The petition has just reached 4000 signatures  Smiley

Yep, and 1000 in the Chippenham constituency (for Bradford-on-Avon Station) alone ... which should help arm my MP (Member of Parliament) in her question for an amended decision.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Mark A
Transport Scholar
Sr. Member
******
Posts: 146


View Profile
« Reply #266 on: October 27, 2021, 08:45:33 am »

Well exactly:

http://www.whitehorsenews.co.uk/blog/2021/10/26/the-community-is-not-going-to-take-rail-cuts/

Mark
Logged
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 620



View Profile
« Reply #267 on: October 27, 2021, 10:26:20 am »

Don't know if anyone has seen this ?

https://www.andrewmurrison.co.uk/sites/www.andrewmurrison.co.uk/files/2021-10/Letter%20to%20Rt%20Hon%20Grant%20Shapps%20MP%2C%20Secretary%20of%20State%20for%20the%20Department%20for%20Transport%2022.10.21.pdf
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #268 on: October 27, 2021, 10:50:17 am »

Don't know if anyone has seen this ?

Thanks - I have added a copy to the member's mirror at
http://www.firstgreatwestern.info/mirror/am2gs_20211022.pdf
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 35005



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #269 on: October 27, 2021, 11:42:51 am »

The petition has just reached 4000 signatures  Smiley

I am ... somewhat surprised ... by how it's continuing to grow today. Lee reported 4,000 just 4 hours ago - now at 4,109 and lots more signatures in the local constituencies.  A mixture of public messages on Facebook saying "I love this service" and "I didn't know about this service" which rather suggests an excellent marketing opportunity and better finances should we manage to save the trains.

Quote
So glad you have signed. We use these trains a lot. They go via Salisbury and Basingstoke to London Waterloo - right by the Embankment and the Royal Festival Hall (for concerts).... and cheaper than going to Paddington. It would be a crying shame to lose it.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Vice Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, and on the board of TravelWatch SouthWest.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 16 17 [18] 19 20 ... 27
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by a customer of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page