Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 06:15 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
06:24 Newbury to Bedwyn
06:30 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
07:00 Bedwyn to Newbury
07:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
07:49 Bedwyn to Newbury
08:13 Newbury to Bedwyn
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:23 Hereford to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:00 Bedwyn to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
23:45 London Paddington to Penzance
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 06:25:23 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[82] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[76] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[74] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[67] Return of the BRUTE?
[57] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[46] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 34
  Print  
Author Topic: South Western Railways Waterloo - Bristol services axed  (Read 74722 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #345 on: November 22, 2021, 15:22:50 »

Typos (so far) corrected and uploaded. Thanks
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1302


View Profile
« Reply #346 on: November 22, 2021, 22:18:57 »

Taxpayer to continue to underwrite the Heathrow to Newquay (Cornwall) route. Wonder if the aircraft as it passes West Wiltshire, is in range of a camera.

https://twitter.com/grantshapps/status/1462799121413246983

(Delighted to announce we have reached an agreement to keep funding direct flights from London to @Newquay_Airport – part of maintaining crucial regional transport links which help to level up the UK (United Kingdom) )
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #347 on: November 23, 2021, 03:07:10 »

Well that will certainly help to level up the carbon emissions Angry

If the railway was better, then demand for domestic air travel would be reduced.
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #348 on: November 23, 2021, 03:25:32 »

And at https://twitter.com/grantshapps/status/1462799123648815104

Quote
Rt Hon Grant Shapps MP (Member of Parliament)
@grantshapps

12h
In another boost for regional connectivity, I have also committed another two years funding for the London-Dundee route Airplane departure

! could not resist a reply:

Quote
And in another example of levelling down regional connectivity, you are AXING the London to Trowbridge and beyond railway route,  @grantshapps - see https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/598397
« Last Edit: November 23, 2021, 03:31:53 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7747



View Profile
« Reply #349 on: November 23, 2021, 10:29:02 »

Taxpayer to continue to underwrite the Heathrow to Newquay (Cornwall) route. Wonder if the aircraft as it passes West Wiltshire, is in range of a camera.

https://twitter.com/grantshapps/status/1462799121413246983

(Delighted to announce we have reached an agreement to keep funding direct flights from London to @Newquay_Airport – part of maintaining crucial regional transport links which help to level up the UK (United Kingdom) )

To be fair (and a far more relevant comparison in this context), the taxpayer has been underwriting the Night Riviera sleeper for years.

Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #350 on: November 23, 2021, 13:30:07 »

I dont mind government subsidy for the Night Riveria, or indeed trains in general. The sleeper is almost certainly greener* than flying or driving.

I am opposed to subsidy for airlines, airports, and related goods or services, unless there is some truly exceptional reason. I would reluctantly accept subsidy for air services to remote islands not otherwise accessible for example. but to Aberdeen, Newquay, or other places on the UK (United Kingdom) mainland, no way.

If we are serious about climate change then we need to fly a LOT less, and should NOT be offering subsidies that encourage more flying.

*As regards the sleeper in particular, rather than trains in general, then the sleeper presumably uses more fuel per passenger  than does a daytime train since a given length and weight of train conveys fewer passengers, this being only partially offset by the lower speed.
That however does not tell the whole story. Air travel often involves a night in an airport hotel as well as the flight.
So the fuel used by the sleeper should be compared with the jet fuel AND the fuel used by the hotel.

Also the train will get greener as electrification spreads, eventually.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #351 on: November 23, 2021, 14:28:45 »

I dont mind government subsidy for the Night Riveria, or indeed trains in general. The sleeper is almost certainly greener* than flying or driving.

I think also that it shouldn't be forgotten that when the government of the day tried to axe the Night Riviera in 2005/2006, there was a huge groundswell of opposition, to an extent rarely seen in rail consultations (remember those?), and it does appear to be one of those rail services that the public not only want to retain, but they have a genuine affection for as well.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7747



View Profile
« Reply #352 on: November 23, 2021, 17:02:17 »

I dont mind government subsidy for the Night Riveria, or indeed trains in general. The sleeper is almost certainly greener* than flying or driving.

I think also that it shouldn't be forgotten that when the government of the day tried to axe the Night Riviera in 2005/2006, there was a huge groundswell of opposition, to an extent rarely seen in rail consultations (remember those?), and it does appear to be one of those rail services that the public not only want to retain, but they have a genuine affection for as well.

I'm sure the case can be made for the Night Riviera subsidy and similarly I can't imagine that the good people of Cornwall (or their MPs (Member of Parliament)) would exactly be turning cartwheels of joy if they were to lose their air links to London either, particularly post Brexit.


Logged
Timmer
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6293


View Profile
« Reply #353 on: November 23, 2021, 17:36:21 »

Sorry to be the harbinger of doom. Here’s the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Waterloo to Exeter December timetable with a part missing  Sad
https://www.southwesternrailway.com/plan-my-journey/~/media/e10a740ad24d42a0bb38e693050fcd03.ashx
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #354 on: November 23, 2021, 17:56:41 »


I'm sure the case can be made for the Night Riviera subsidy and similarly I can't imagine that the good people of Cornwall (or their MPs (Member of Parliament)) would exactly be turning cartwheels of joy if they were to lose their air links to London either, particularly post Brexit.


Yes of course those who use the air service would like it to continue, but the wider picture needs to be considered, not just the users.
Air travel is very polluting and should be minimised and discouraged, not subidised  to encourage greater use.

And this is not self interest since I use neither the sleeper nor the air route. But would support subsidy for the sleeper and not for the air route.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #355 on: November 23, 2021, 19:35:54 »

Sorry to be the harbinger of doom. Here’s the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Waterloo to Exeter December timetable with a part missing  Sad
https://www.southwesternrailway.com/plan-my-journey/~/media/e10a740ad24d42a0bb38e693050fcd03.ashx

Not sure if "harbinger of doom" is quite the wording.  The storm clouds were already there when we noticed them at the end of July and they're just getting closer.   SWR [knew/had every reason] to plan for the scaling back three months earlier, so timetable planning, graphics are, number and training of crew and various other miscellanea were going ahead on the basis of services ending in December at a time they knew but their customers didn't.   So no surprise what so ever at the publication ... IF anything gets changed, as it should, there will be a gnashing of teeth and grumbles about the difficulty of changing and supporting, in order for them to simply carry on what they've been doing for years.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Trowres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 750


View Profile
« Reply #356 on: November 23, 2021, 20:12:16 »

Quote
It also shows train services between:
l Bristol Temple Meads, Bath Spa, Yeovil Pen Mill and
London Waterloo - see timetable 20A

Except that 20A shows white space against Bristol-Trowbridge.

Too ashamed to show connections?
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #357 on: November 23, 2021, 20:31:03 »

The SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Stakeholder Conference was today. In the slides not one mention of Bristol or Exeter.  Salisbury is there four times ...

Quote
It also shows train services between:
l Bristol Temple Meads, Bath Spa, Yeovil Pen Mill and
London Waterloo - see timetable 20A

Except that 20A shows white space against Bristol-Trowbridge.

Too ashamed to show connections?

Space for an easy edit then  Grin Grin
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40690



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #358 on: November 24, 2021, 10:22:53 »

The SWR» (South Western Railway - about) Stakeholder Conference was today. In the slides not one mention of Bristol or Exeter.  Salisbury is there four times ...


Further feedback from people who attended the forum ...

Quote
The rest of the day was inward looking and lacked transparency on the Salisbury-Bristol-Waterloo issue.  Emphasis was placed on the 20 passengers they recorded using the route and estimated 12 who make the change there.
And we still question just when the recording was done(%), how complete it was, and how the numbers who change might increase dramatically if there wasn't usually a 49 minute(*) wait one way and 59 minute wait the other.

Quote
Ongoing analysis of the timetable consultation responses and working with the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) to agree next steps meant SWR were unwilling to say much.  I felt they made a bit of a mess of explaining the withdrawal of the Waterloo Bristol services even with two goes at it.  They did, however,  say they are working with GWR (Great Western Railway) on connections which prompted [redacted] to ask why they aren’t working with local authorities and STBs as well.
It's very hard to explain the withdrawal if you don't admit it's a screw-up.  Perhaps if they told us the whole truth, or at confirmed that it was wrong and looked to correct the situation instead of kicking in into the long grass, hiding it in a haystack, and hoping that it times out they might be better received.

(%) - I would look for reassurance that the measurements were not taken during the prolonged industrial unrest at SWR, nor during a lockdown of recommended "no-travel" time, or between Christmas and the new year.  Do they relate to on-train observations (which at times are difficult as it's hard to get through the train - and just HOW do you count through passengers as they pile off and on at the same time), or to ticket sales with specific routing only?   Was it done on one particular train of the day - perhaps not the busiest one  Grin. Are the numbers per carriage, per train, or per day?

(*) - Previously I wrote "59 minutes one way and about 50 the other" and on at least one occasion I failed to add the word "about".   My error, no intent to confuse.  It's usually 59 minutes one way and 49 the other - personally I don't feel the one minute makes a huge difference, but one of the TOCs (Train Operating Company) involved has written to me asking for clarification because "I have tried, and failed, to find these" ... and I have responded with examples:

Quote
1F14 leaves for CDF» (Cardiff - next trains) at 11:42
1L25 arrives from WAT at 11:43
1F16 leaves for CDF at 12:42

1L29 arrives from WAT at 12:43

and

Quote
1F11 arrives from CDF ar 11:32
1L40 leaves for WAT at 12:21


1F13 arrives from CDF at 12:32
1L44 leaves for WAT at 13:21

No acknowledgement of my response ... perhaps too busy letting time pass?
« Last Edit: November 24, 2021, 10:30:09 by grahame » Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1302


View Profile
« Reply #359 on: November 24, 2021, 10:30:58 »

On 49 - 60 minute connections... "They have tried and failed to find these" ??
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 22 23 [24] 25 26 ... 34
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page