Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:15 18 Apr 2024
* Dubai airport delays persist after UAE storm
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
18th Apr (1966)
Melksham Station closed (link)

Train RunningCancelled
15:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:38 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
17:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
18:43 Bristol Temple Meads to Westbury
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
18:51 Filton Abbey Wood to Bristol Temple Meads
18:53 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
19:14 Bristol Temple Meads to Avonmouth
19:46 Avonmouth to Bristol Temple Meads
19:50 Worcester Foregate Street to Bristol Temple Meads
22:24 Bristol Temple Meads to Severn Beach
23:08 Severn Beach to Bristol Temple Meads
23:33 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 04:45 Redhill to Gatwick Airport
19/04/24 05:11 Gatwick Airport to Reading
Short Run
15:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
15:52 London Paddington to Great Malvern
16:39 Bristol Temple Meads to Worcester Foregate Street
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
17:10 Gloucester to Weymouth
17:28 Weymouth to Bristol Temple Meads
19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:13 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
20:50 Bristol Temple Meads to Weymouth
Delayed
16:18 London Paddington to Swansea
16:48 London Paddington to Swansea
18:02 Worcester Foregate Street to London Paddington
18:18 Carmarthen to London Paddington
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 18, 2024, 18:30:44 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[185] Rail delay compensation payments hit £100 million
[46] Signage - not making it easy ...
[23] IETs at Melksham
[21] Ferry just cancelled - train tickets will be useless - advice?
[19] From Melksham to Tallinn (and back round The Baltic) by train
[18] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: The social importance of providing buses for EVERYONE - not just the entitled  (Read 1749 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« on: September 06, 2021, 11:27:10 »

From the Stoke Sentinel

Quote
Girl, 16, 'to drive tractor to sixth form' in school bus seats row

Well ... if tractors can be driven from the age of 16, it makes a point and microsense - if not macrosense!
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5408



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 06, 2021, 11:50:13 »

What about an electric scooter ? not the stand on type, but the type that resemble a motorbike, electric power instead of petrol.

« Last Edit: September 07, 2021, 10:28:31 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Ralph Ayres
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 337


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 06, 2021, 12:05:48 »

The arrangement does seem to have fallen foul of some well-intentioned but in this case counterproductive legislation, the council rep not helping by trotting out a wishy-washy statement that repeats what everyone knows already and fails to explain the reasons at all clearly.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 06, 2021, 12:34:59 »

So it seems school buses are only provided up to age 16. Why?
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40783



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #4 on: September 06, 2021, 12:42:22 »

So it seems school buses are only provided up to age 16. Why?

It may be to do with "little monsters" turning into "big monsters" on their 16th Birthday.  From https://www.ucheck.co.uk/dbs-checks-for-under-18s/  talking about changes in 2015:

Quote
Under these new rules, children over 16 must undergo a DBS» (Deutsch Bahn Schenker - UK (United Kingdom) website) Check – but children under 16 are not allowed to.


Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2021, 12:58:44 »

So it seems school buses are only provided up to age 16. Why?

Free school transport started with the 1944 education act, and the age limit of 16 covered the new minimum school-leaving age of 15 and the usual part-year at age 15. I'm not sure why sixth-formers didn't need it - but I was already cycling by that age.

Since then the school-leaving age has gone up more than once, and now there are these rules about accessible buses and paying passengers, but the free transport rules have not changed to match. It's not the first case of administrative or legislative dissonance, and I doubt it will be the last.
Logged
Bmblbzzz
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4256


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2021, 16:46:40 »

Well exactly. It's intended as transport to school.
Logged

Waiting at Pilning for the midnight sleeper to Prague.
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 548


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2021, 17:35:52 »

The council has only been required to provide school busses for children in compulsory education where specific conditions such as distance and lack of footpaths apply..  Many councils will sell spare seats on school busses to 6th formers but this is entirely dependent on the council and the availability of spare places. I can see that the changes from covid have reduced flexibility and meant that there are no available places.
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5408



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 07, 2021, 03:08:56 »



Very silly rules IMHO (in my humble opinion), are the older ones really going to sexually interfere with the younger ones, on a bus in view of others, and watched by CCTV (Closed Circuit Tele Vision) ?
Remembering that they will be in the same school buildings together, without any criminal record checks.
And that no criminal record checks are needed to travel on an ordinary bus, that may be conveying younger children to school or otherwise.
« Last Edit: September 07, 2021, 03:37:58 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7163


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 07, 2021, 10:35:35 »

This is given as the real reason for this problem in the article, though the council official's quote does not confirm that:
Quote
Now the council has decided not to reinstate the scheme, unless it is persuaded otherwise over the next six weeks.

It is due to recently published guidance on the impact of Public Service Vehicles Accessibility Regulations (PSVAR) on Home to School Transport.

PSVAR only allows seats to be sold on vehicles, with more than 22 seats, if it is wheelchair accessible. But, the majority of the vehicles currently used by the council do not comply with this.

This all comes down to the pre-existing definitions of the different species of bus/coach operation in the regulations, which are used in the PSVAR regulations. These, as is customary, are based on criteria that seemed to define the right categories at the time but were and are not the really important ones. In this case it turns out that whether passengers are carried "at separate fares" matters, and that depends on the details of the contract with the council where they pay the whole cost. But, according to this legal guidance from transportlawyer.co.uk:
Quote
The general position is that where transport is provided to the user free of charge (which is the case for a number of schoolchildren who are eligible for free travel), then the regulations do not apply.  However, it is not uncommon for local authorities to sell spare seats on vehicles to fee-paying passengers.  Where this is the case, a separate fare is paid, thus the journey will fall in-scope (assuming that the other features of the journey make it a local or scheduled service – which, for many home to school journeys is likely to be the case).  It only requires one passenger paying a separate fare to require the vehicle to comply with the regulations.

Apparently DfT» (Department for Transport - about) are pondering a further transitional exemption.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page