Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 11:35 28 Mar 2024
* Manhunt after stabbing in front of train passengers
- How do I renew my UK passport and what is the 10-year rule?
* Easter travel warning as millions set to hit roads
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
28th Mar (1988)
Woman found murdered on Orpington to London train (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:29 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
10:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
10:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
10:41 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
11:00 Bristol Temple Meads to London Paddington
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:16 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
11:23 Weston-Super-Mare to London Paddington
11:30 London Paddington to Bristol Temple Meads
11:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
12:15 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:30 London Paddington to Weston-Super-Mare
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
06:00 London Paddington to Penzance
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
09:50 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
10:55 Paignton to London Paddington
11:12 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
11:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:03 London Paddington to Penzance
Delayed
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:48 London Paddington to Swansea
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:30 Weymouth to Gloucester
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:51 Warminster to Gloucester
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 28, 2024, 11:43:20 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[161] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[91] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[62] Return of the BRUTE?
[53] If not HS2 to Manchester, how will traffic be carried?
[49] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[38] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: For once, a new way of rail-head cleaning  (Read 2789 times)
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« on: October 04, 2021, 15:50:21 »

You'd be forgiven a degree of scepticism about any new way of getting leaves and their slippery residues off rails - we keep getting "the end of this problem is nigh" news releases followed by not a lot. This one is at least a novel idea - while it's been in development since 2015, I don't recall hearing about it before. But it's by no means obvious why it should work better than other methods.

From Sheffield University
:
Quote
  •    University of Sheffield engineers have developed a new track cleaning system to remove leaves from railway lines - an issue which costs the rail industry millions of pounds each year
  •    Pioneering technology can be deployed onboard passenger trains - the first time passenger trains have been used to clean the line anywhere in the world
  •    Trials have shown the cleaning system reduces delays, improves braking distances and is significantly more effective at removing leaves from the line than the current track cleaning methods
Delays to train services caused by leaves on the line could finally become a thing of the past, thanks to new track cleaning technology developed by engineers at the University of Sheffield.

The new rail cleaning technique, developed by a team of researchers led by Professor Roger Lewis from the University’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, uses dry ice pellets in a stream of high pressure air which freeze the leaves and then as the pellets turn back to gas they are blasted away from the railhead. ...

I'm not so sure about this statement: "The system is also much better for the environment as it uses reclaimed carbon dioxide." Rather than what?
Logged
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1286


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: October 04, 2021, 17:52:56 »

radio bristol had an interview with Prof. roger Lewis on monday 4 october about the new cleaning method starts approx 17:30pm
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: October 04, 2021, 21:13:33 »

I thought that there was a shortage of carbon dioxide ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: October 04, 2021, 22:05:41 »

I thought that there was a shortage of carbon dioxide ?
Also I thought we were trying to reduce Carbon Dioxide emissions?
Logged
PrestburyRoad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 193


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2021, 22:09:47 »

Quote
I thought that there was a shortage of carbon dioxide ?
I believe the shortage is food-grade carbon dioxide.  So the gas may still be readily available in less-pure form - and this might well be suitable for rail-head use.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: October 04, 2021, 22:38:18 »

I'm not so sure about this statement: "The system is also much better for the environment as it uses reclaimed carbon dioxide." Rather than what?

That was not just unclear, it was misleading. I'm sure they were saying they didn't use the CO2 from fertilizer plants, which use methane as a feedstock (and has recently been in short supply). CO2 could be called "recycled" if it comes from the atmosphere (from oxygen and nitrogen production) or captured from fermentation, for example. What I think is specious is the suggestion that this machine is uniquely capable of using such dry ice. It can hardly be rather than other dry-ice-based rail cleaners, surely?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2021, 02:12:14 »

Quote
I thought that there was a shortage of carbon dioxide ?
I believe the shortage is food-grade carbon dioxide.  So the gas may still be readily available in less-pure form - and this might well be suitable for rail-head use.

So far as I am aware, "dry ice" or solid carbon dioxide comes in only one grade, it is either dry ice or it is not.

Carbon dioxide in cylinders is allegedly available in food grade and in not food grade. I doubt that there is any difference. I have observed both types of carbon dioxide cylinder being filled from the same bulk tank and in similar surroundings.
The workers handling the food grade cylinders wore white coats whereas those handling the industrial cylinders wore blue overall coats, perhaps that is the difference!

Most but not all industrial carbon dioxide cylinders have an internal dip tube such that LIQUID and not vapour emerges when the valve is opened. Often used to freeze water pipes for repairs. The presence of this internal dip tube is indicated by an external white line along the length of the cylinder.
« Last Edit: October 05, 2021, 02:51:13 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7155


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 28, 2022, 23:53:27 »

While we are still looking for that elusive solution to the adhesion problem, which still causes accidents and wheel flats, over on Long Island it's already been found! And I've heard they have a leaf or two in those parts. This is from MTA LIRR:
Quote
LIRR’s Leaf-Fighting Technology Gets Stronger and Faster

Long Island Rail Road
Updated October 30, 2020 10:15 p.m.

The Rail Road Adds Second Laser Train and Increases Speed Resulting in Less Delays and Trains Being Taken out of Service


MTA Long Island Rail Road (LIRR) today announced that its industry-leading laser train is working even faster and harder to battle the danger of fallen leaves on the tracks. The LIRR has added another laser train and increased the speed to 25 mph, up from 15 mph, covering more of the system and minimizing the number cars from being taken out of service during the fall season...

Since 2018, the LIRR Maintenance of Equipment Department (MoE) has transformed how to tackle the negative effects of leaf fall season with innovative solutions such as partnering with Amsterdam-based manufacturer Laser Precision Solutions who pioneered the technology. The laser train works by using high-intensity lasers to remove contaminated layers from railway tracks, requiring only one pass to leave a smooth, clean rail behind. With the addition of a second train, all vital parts of the network can be cleaned every 24 hours. With an effect lasting at least 24 hours, this means that slip-slide will be minimized to a very low level.

Note that that was a second train being added in autumn 2020, after running the first one as a trial for two years.

The system is quite small, only 700 miles of track, so doing all that at 25 mph would take 14 hours by two trains. Most of that track is in the less-busy outer branches, so the slow RHTTs (Rail Head Treatment Train) should not be a serious obstruction.

While deploying the equipment over the whole GBR (Great British Railways) network might not make sense (yet), the London commuter part at least can't be so different.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page