Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 08:35 29 Mar 2024
- Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
- Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
07:20 Reading to Gatwick Airport
08:46 Bedwyn to Newbury
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
Short Run
04:54 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
05:55 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
07:24 Exmouth to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 08:51:40 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[109] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[72] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[67] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[66] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[59] Return of the BRUTE?
[41] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
Author Topic: A home for Great British Railways  (Read 2734 times)
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #15 on: October 05, 2021, 10:14:59 »

I suspect it’s not big enough? Will need a national team of timetablers, not just a team of checkers, plus all NR» (Network Rail - home page) staff. So many TOC (Train Operating Company) timetabling staff will TUPE (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.) across & will likely need to relocate from their TOC-tower - the number coming in via TUPE will possibly exceed the numbervalready there, and those that don’t want to relocate will have plenty of replacements amongst Toc staffers
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: October 05, 2021, 10:54:43 »

I suspect it’s not big enough? Will need a national team of timetablers, not just a team of checkers, plus all NR» (Network Rail - home page) staff. So many TOC (Train Operating Company) timetabling staff will TUPE (The Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006.) across & will likely need to relocate from their TOC-tower - the number coming in via TUPE will possibly exceed the numbervalready there, and those that don’t want to relocate will have plenty of replacements amongst Toc staffers

Why would they need to all travel to the same workplace? That's one of the big attitude shifts to come out of the pandemic: going to one place to work together now needs to be justified rather than being a near-universal assumption. The railways may be big losers commercially from that, but can't really ignore the impact on their own working practices. An of course the tools and techniques for doing it are now widespread and familiar.

So, a home for GBR (Great British Railways) could be ... a network, like GBR.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12334


View Profile Email
« Reply #17 on: October 05, 2021, 11:17:08 »

I would suggest that timetablers, for example, need to chat to other timetablers where their sections of routes overlapwith others, and that is far easier done face-to-face than over zoom!
Logged
ellendune
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4452


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: October 05, 2021, 20:18:10 »

I would suggest that timetablers, for example, need to chat to other timetablers where their sections of routes overlapwith others, and that is far easier done face-to-face than over zoom!

Those of us who have been working over Teams or Zoom (other video conference platforms are available) for the last 18 months have found that a lot more can be done this way than we ever would have thought possible. In addition other platforms such as Miro Board have come on stream which make remote meetings even closer to the in person meetings. 
Logged
rogerpatenall
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 321



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: October 06, 2021, 08:58:14 »

I would suggest that timetablers, for example, need to chat to other timetablers where their sections of routes overlapwith others, and that is far easier done face-to-face than over zoom!

Those of us who have been working over Teams or Zoom (other video conference platforms are available) for the last 18 months have found that a lot more can be done this way than we ever would have thought possible. In addition other platforms such as Miro Board have come on stream which make remote meetings even closer to the in person meetings. 

I couldn't agree more. Our charity has its monthly trustee meetings on Zoom. We have trustees in both India and New Zealand who are now much more involved in the running of the charity, and after each meeting closes we continue informally for 10/15 minutes or so when each trustee in turn tells us about their non-charity 'lives' and plans and thoughts and we just chat. That has made a huge difference, and made our board  (of 8 people) far closer than it ever was pre-pandemic.
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: October 06, 2021, 10:37:13 »

As it is Great BRITISH Railways, Shapps should team up with Gove, who is charged with maintaining the Union and have three offices - one at Cilmeri; one at Kinbrace and the third at Settle. Should improve the local employment and economies.  Grin  Roll Eyes
Or, if you want a larger talent pool able to commute by rail rather than a tiny village (Cilmeri), Machynlleth, Perth and Derby.

I would agree with those saying that it doesn't need everyone to travel to the same place though. Head offices in Machynlleth, Perth and Derby, but does somebody writing the timetable for Devon and Cornwall need to go to head office? They could do that in Plymouth couldn't they?
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: October 06, 2021, 11:18:24 »

There's another relevant objective for GBR (Great British Railways), that of devolution and "levelling up". Obviously this sits rather uncomfortably with the main objective of unification and de-fragmentation, but then that's politics. So in that sense the central organisation should be as little as possible - and a lot of organisations of al kinds would say that's what they are doing already.

So, what's the absolute minimum core staff requirement for GBR? Presumably it's a Controlling Mind and the few Controlling Minders needed to keep it happy. That should all fit in a train - so why not?
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: October 06, 2021, 11:44:19 »

So all those people who moved to Milton Keynes not long ago because Network Rail wanted an HQ (Headquarters) would of course welcome the opportunity of disrupting their families again to move somewhere else!  Or might there be another exodus of skilled people from the railway industry?

GBR (Great British Railways) will be Train Operator lead that is the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) will almost certainly be from a ToC.  Also you have to remember that MK (Milton Keynes) only houses certain functions of Network Rail even as part of NR» (Network Rail - home page) devolution some of the people that are now in a Region are based at the Quadrant; there are also other key central safety, engineering Ops functions that overtime may change.

The transition to GBR will be a progressive one, yes NR will get absorbed into it, that because it is relatively easy and quick to do being a single body.

MK never lived up to the original grand Ian Coucher scheme of being the single National centre from where everything was going to be run from, Mark Carne changed all of that with devolution and the Andrew Haines 'Putting Passengers First' has taken devolution further by putting the 'power' into Regions.

And finaly Network Rail HQ is not Milton Keynes it is in fact London


As for loss of skill and experience should be more with the "modernising" process currently happening in the industry this has a voluntary severance scheme which is open (in stages) to all, NR are currently going through this and many of the applicants are the more experience people
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #23 on: October 06, 2021, 15:26:56 »

So all those people who moved to Milton Keynes not long ago because Network Rail wanted an HQ (Headquarters) would of course welcome the opportunity of disrupting their families again to move somewhere else!  Or might there be another exodus of skilled people from the railway industry?

GBR (Great British Railways) will be Train Operator lead that is the CEO (Chief Executive Officer) will almost certainly be from a ToC. 

I disagree. I think the CEO is odds-on to be Andrew Haines, who has just been appointed head of the GBR Transition Team, and will remain as CEO of Network Rail throughout that transition.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
TaplowGreen
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7747



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: October 06, 2021, 17:02:43 »

Wherever it goes it should use existing buildings. No need for an expensive new office block. The railways have plenty of under utilised real estate.

Exactly. Taxpayer funded so the smallest necessary building in the most economical & practical location.

Logged
JayMac
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: October 06, 2021, 17:28:15 »

Exactly. Taxpayer funded so the smallest necessary building in the most economical & practical location.

Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
4064ReadingAbbey
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 455


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: October 06, 2021, 18:01:39 »

My reading of the Williams-Shapps Plan is modified by profound doubts about the real reason for the document...and this reflects in the requirement for a new headquarters for Great British Railways.

A few senior civil servants in the Department for Transport (DfT» (Department for Transport - about)) have mentioned in the past that it has been asked to adjudicate on matters that really should not be in its remit, for example, decisions on the type and number of coffee cup holders in a new, or re-built, fleet of trains. This type of activity does not sit well with the DfT's overall job of setting strategy and funding for the railways and, reading the runes, my interpretation is that the senior management of the DfT would like to hive off the 'day-to-day' railways functions performed within the DfT. Essentially these are the activities concerned with monitoring and control of the Train Operating Companies whether as franchises or state controlled operators; details of the infrastructure side have generally always been handled at arms length.

I see it as a move to reverse the decision to wind up the Strategic Rail Authority (SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about)) made by Alastair Darling in 2006 which transferred the franchising functions (after the 1993 Act initially performed by the Office of Passenger Rail Franchising) to the DfT. The effect was that more and more of the minutiae of railway operation required decisions to be made at the centre.

Not all of these were advantageous - think of the West Coast franchising fiasco; setting the frameworks for franchise bids but failing to check that the infrastructure could cope with the results; setting the rules for franchising the East Coast Main Line in such a way that it was uneconomic to run, not once but twice; trying to transfer so much risk to the potential train operators that most UK (United Kingdom)-based companies decided the game was no longer worth the candle; making timetable specifications part of the franchising contract and not being able to make quick decisions on contract changes which was part of the reason for the 2018 timetable melt down; having no plan fixed in advance for what it wanted out of the Great Western Electrification programme[1]; I won't mention the Intercity Express Programme...  Roll Eyes

As the body politic finds it so very hard indeed to say that it made a mistake I read the whole thing as a way for the DfT to get shot of the rump activities of the SRA so any future less than optimal decisions will not directly reflect on the Secretary of State. After all one of the main considerations in the Civil Service is 'Don't embarrass the Minister' and in future any awkward questions can be passed off to Great British Railways — 'Not me, Guv, try over there...'

So, basically, the train operating specifications and the infrastructure strategy will pass to the new body. Infrastructure is already devolved and day to day train operation always has been devolved for the past 180 years. So Williams/Shapps has in effect recreated the Railways Executive/British Railways and the top level organisation, the British Transport Commission/British Railways Board running trains, infrastructure, ships, hotels, workshops and a staff of half a million people, operated out of the Great Central Hotel at 222 Marylebone Road for many years.

Ships, hotels and workshops and most of the workforce are long gone - so all we need to look for is a smallish office building within walking distance of a station.

If the financial benefits being brought to a new location are seen as significant, then the headquarters staff is too big.


[1] This was in fact a logical decision as the National Audit Office strongly criticised the DfT's programme plan and handling of the West Coast Route Modernisation so it decided not to give another hostage to fortune and not have a plan at all for the Great Western.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2021, 18:10:34 by 4064ReadingAbbey » Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: October 08, 2021, 12:13:37 »

I would urge not "over thinking" the location for GBR (Great British Railways) offices. For reasons already given I would favour anywhere reasonably central and with good rail connections, but not London.

Of much greater importance than location is what policies the new organisation will adopt. Managed decline like with BR (British Rail(ways))? Or active promotion of rail  by better services, more capacity and other improvements ?
Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Jamsdad
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 201


View Profile Email
« Reply #28 on: October 08, 2021, 13:12:12 »

I think they should locate to somewhere that demonstrates the realities of present day long distance travel, somwhere with  travel on uncomfortable seats, awful trolley service and painfully slow stretches of track and the possibillity of winter storm damage. How about Plymouth?
Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5398



View Profile
« Reply #29 on: October 08, 2021, 14:51:02 »

I think they should locate to somewhere that demonstrates the realities of present day long distance travel, somewhere with  travel on uncomfortable seats, awful trolley service and painfully slow stretches of track and the possibility of winter storm damage. How about Plymouth?

It is a very tempting thought. If GBR (Great British Railways) managers had to put up with that sort of thing, I suspect that we would see significant improvements PDQ.
"Ironing board" seats have already been mentioned as a priority by GBR.

Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 [2]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page