Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 09:35 29 Mar 2024
* Bus plunges off South Africa bridge, killing 45
* Easter getaway begins with flood alerts in place
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
29th Mar (1913)
Foundation of National Union or Railwaymen (*)

Train RunningCancelled
09:00 Gatwick Airport to Reading
09:08 Newbury to Bedwyn
09:46 Westbury to Swindon
09:54 Bedwyn to Newbury
10:22 Newbury to Bedwyn
10:55 Bedwyn to Newbury
11:05 Swindon to Westbury
11:29 Newbury to Bedwyn
11:57 Bedwyn to Newbury
12:17 Westbury to Swindon
12:52 Bedwyn to Newbury
13:15 Swindon to Westbury
14:19 Westbury to Swindon
15:14 Swindon to Westbury
16:23 Westbury to Swindon
17:36 Swindon to Westbury
18:37 Westbury to Swindon
20:13 Swindon to Westbury
21:16 Westbury to Swindon
22:30 Swindon to Westbury
Short Run
05:33 Plymouth to London Paddington
06:37 Plymouth to London Paddington
07:03 London Paddington to Paignton
08:35 Plymouth to London Paddington
08:41 Westbury to Bristol Temple Meads
09:37 London Paddington to Paignton
09:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Salisbury
10:35 London Paddington to Exeter St Davids
Delayed
05:03 Penzance to London Paddington
06:05 Penzance to London Paddington
07:10 Penzance to London Paddington
08:03 London Paddington to Penzance
08:15 Penzance to London Paddington
09:04 London Paddington to Plymouth
10:04 London Paddington to Penzance
11:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
PollsOpen and recent polls
Closed 2024-03-25 Easter Escape - to where?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
March 29, 2024, 09:38:24 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[149] Infrastructure problems in Thames Valley causing disruption el...
[64] would you like your own LIVE train station departure board?
[59] West Wiltshire Bus Changes April 2024
[58] Reversing Beeching - bring heritage and freight lines into the...
[52] Return of the BRUTE?
[36] 2024 - Service update and amendment log, Swindon <-> Westbury...
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12
  Print  
Author Topic: Two trains collide near Salisbury - 31 Oct 21  (Read 21648 times)
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #150 on: November 17, 2021, 20:08:52 »

Oh, and Clan Line. Cracking picture of D1015. A favourite loco of mine.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Western Pathfinder
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1528



View Profile
« Reply #151 on: November 17, 2021, 21:20:07 »

Second that BNM.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #152 on: November 17, 2021, 21:29:37 »

That hedgerow looks to me to be mostly rooted behind the fence. Encroaching onto the field.

I think you're flattering it by calling it a hedgerow. Is it all Buddleia?
Logged
Oxonhutch
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 1244



View Profile
« Reply #153 on: November 18, 2021, 09:13:40 »

I was told by a railway professional, but would like it confirmed by legal minds, that the railway owns the land 6 feet beyond the boundary fence; this is to enable them to maintain said fence.
Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40691



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #154 on: November 18, 2021, 10:50:55 »

I was told by a railway professional, but would like it confirmed by legal minds, that the railway owns the land 6 feet beyond the boundary fence; this is to enable them to maintain said fence.

It would seem unlikely that they would own it - thinking of gardens backing on to the railway fence in lots of places, but they probably have a right of access and, yes, I can believe that would be a 6 foot allowance.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1302


View Profile
« Reply #155 on: November 18, 2021, 13:32:42 »

It's a problem for neighbouring farmers as that can decrease the productivity of the field alongside.

In urban areas, this will cast excess shade on small gardens, but also lead to a split of neighbour opinions: 'Please manage your vegetation' versus more or less rational takes on 'Trees.'
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4356


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #156 on: November 18, 2021, 22:41:44 »

I was told by a railway professional, but would like it confirmed by legal minds, that the railway owns the land 6 feet beyond the boundary fence; this is to enable them to maintain said fence.

I don't think that is the case.  The railways has certain powers in can use to access its land in certain circumstances eg a derailment but its not powers the railways make use of.  To access the railway across third party land contact is made with the land owner and times and terms agreed
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18895



View Profile
« Reply #157 on: November 18, 2021, 23:08:47 »

Oh, and Clan Line. Cracking picture of D1015. A favourite loco of mine.

D1015 Western Champion was recently (Sept 2021) back out on Network Rail metals load testing with cement wagons in preparation for a return to use on mainline railtours. Sadly, she suffered an engine seizure on a trip to and from Avonmouth and has returned to the Severn Valley Railway for further work. Hopefully she will back on railtours in 2022.



Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
Clan Line
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 858



View Profile
« Reply #158 on: November 19, 2021, 09:24:29 »

Oh, and Clan Line. Cracking picture of D1015. A favourite loco of mine.

D1015 Western Champion was recently (Sept 2021) back out on Network Rail metals load testing with cement wagons in preparation for a return to use on mainline railtours. Sadly, she suffered an engine seizure on a trip to and from Avonmouth and has returned to the Severn Valley Railway for further work. Hopefully she will back on railtours in 2022.


I seem to recollect that not long after I took that photo of D1015 she put a couple of pistons through the side of the engine block.
I love the second part of the video: With the foreshortening effect of the long lens it makes the "light" loco look like a little bubble car scurrying along the track !
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5316


View Profile
« Reply #159 on: February 21, 2022, 10:32:03 »

RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) have published an interim report, I’ve had a quick read through and it really just confirms what exactly happened and when. 

I think we had eventually realised that contrary to the mass media scare stories about “sitting ducks” both trains were moving at the first impact, and there were no preceding signal failures, or objects on the line etc etc.

Investigations continue into various things, especially rail conditions at the time:

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1055846/IR012022_220221_Salisbury_Tunnel_Junction.pdf
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #160 on: February 21, 2022, 10:52:07 »

There's no mention in that RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) report of looking at the public statements made by NR» (Network Rail - home page) and others. In fact I don't think it's part of RAIB's remit, but it is a topic ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about) have criticised in the past. I wonder if they would do so in this case.
Logged
infoman
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1287


View Profile
« Reply #161 on: February 21, 2022, 11:41:13 »

I would have thought that most junctions would have had catch points fitted.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10096


View Profile
« Reply #162 on: February 21, 2022, 12:15:28 »

I would have thought that most junctions would have had catch points fitted.

Catch points are only generally fitted at exits to sidings or loops, or smaller junctions where two tracks diverge into one and catch points would derail the train into a safe place - not possible at a lot of larger junctions.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #163 on: October 31, 2022, 11:44:42 »

RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) have just added this paragraph to their page for this incident:
Quote
RAIB’s draft investigation report into this accident is currently being reviewed prior to the start of the consultation. RAIB expects to publish the final investigation report before the end of the year. RAIB issued an interim report in February 2022, which discussed our initial findings, and has continued to liaise with stakeholders, including the rail industry, as the investigation has progressed.

That consultation is, I presume, just the routine discussion of the report with the concerned parties prior to publication.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7156


View Profile
« Reply #164 on: June 28, 2023, 23:22:38 »

RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) have just added this paragraph to their page for this incident:
Quote
RAIB’s draft investigation report into this accident is currently being reviewed prior to the start of the consultation. RAIB expects to publish the final investigation report before the end of the year. RAIB issued an interim report in February 2022, which discussed our initial findings, and has continued to liaise with stakeholders, including the rail industry, as the investigation has progressed.

That consultation is, I presume, just the routine discussion of the report with the concerned parties prior to publication.

That paragraph was revised in December to predict publication of the final report "in the spring".
Yesterday it was re-revised to read:
Quote
RAIB’s draft investigation report into this accident has now been sent to interested parties as part of the statutory consultation process. RAIB expects to publish the final report shortly after the consultation process is completed. RAIB issued an interim report in February 2022 and continues to liaise with stakeholders on our findings and any arising safety issues.
Logged
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 ... 9 10 [11] 12
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page