Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 18:35 16 Apr 2024
* Birmingham Airport suspends operations over security incident
* Birmingham Airport suspends flights over incident
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 02/06/24 - Summer Timetable starts
17/08/24 - Bus to Imber
27/09/25 - 200 years of passenger trains

On this day
16th Apr (1987)
~ Tulyar arrives at Swanley New Barn Railway (link)

Train RunningCancelled
22:44 Taunton to Bristol Temple Meads
17/04/24 00:45 London Paddington to Reading
Short Run
16:31 Barnstaple to Axminster
19:56 Cardiff Central to Taunton
23:24 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
Delayed
An additional train service has been planned to operate as shown 17:48 Exeter St Davids to Axminster
PollsThere are no open or recent polls
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
April 16, 2024, 18:38:59 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[303] Problems with the Night Riviera sleeper - December 2014 onward...
[71] New station at Ashley Down, Bristol
[69] BBC Great Coastal Railway Journeys - A Correction
[69] Proposals for open access services on new routes
[65] Okehampton
[51] First tour train of season
 
News: the Great Western Coffee Shop ... keeping you up to date with travel around the South West
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
  Print  
Author Topic: Two trains collide near Salisbury - 31 Oct 21  (Read 21805 times)
TonyK
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 6438


The artist formerly known as Four Track, Now!


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: November 01, 2021, 14:07:36 »

BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) lunchtime news reports 5 people still in hospital, all described as stable.

Now it is being reported that the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) driver's injuries are more serious, and sadly will have long-term consequences.

Alas so, using that awful term "life changing".
Logged

Now, please!
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10114


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: November 01, 2021, 14:08:52 »

But what happens to the signallers who are on shift in such circumstances, do they have to get relieved?

As soon as practically possible, yes.  Especially if there’s any reason to believe their actions may have caused or contributed to an incident.
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7162


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: November 01, 2021, 14:24:45 »

I think in Stuving’s excellent summary the eastbound GWR (Great Western Railway) (1F27) would have been stopped by an area emergency call.  I’m therefore assuming that if they were still in Salisbury’s control area then it would not necessarily be a priority to get them going again. 

Paul

Yes, that is all in the Salisbury signalling area. That explanation would explain the initial stop, and I wonder if there was a concern even that early to get information from the driver about anything on the track, or any other source of evidence such the FFTV.
Logged
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: November 01, 2021, 14:27:29 »

Apparently the Telegraph (paywalled) are now reporting that there was only one incident:
Quote
Initial reports suggested the first train had hit an object, causing it to derail, and that the second train ploughed into the displaced, stranded service.

But in an update on Monday afternoon, British Transport Police (BTP (British Transport Police)) confirmed this was not the case, and that both trains were travelling in the same direction when one train struck the side of the other, causing it to derail whilst in the tunnel.

BTP on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/BTP/status/1455173517847171074?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet

Quote
There is no evidence to suggest the train struck an object or that there was any significant delay between the collision and the derailment.

Also supported by a recent BTP statement:
https://www.btp.police.uk/news/btp/news/england/derailment-at-fisherton-tunnel-salisbury---statement/
« Last Edit: November 01, 2021, 14:38:01 by paul7755 » Logged
Mark A
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1335


View Profile
« Reply #34 on: November 01, 2021, 14:43:17 »

Eyewitness account from a passenger travelling from Brighton to Southampton and then onto the GWR (Great Western Railway) service where he was to alight at Salisbury - and in the event ended up being walked through the tunnel and along the tracks into Salisbury Station which is quite a trek in itself.

It may be significant that he doesn't mention two events.

https://www.salisburyjournal.co.uk/news/19685161.salisbury-train-crash-passengers-experience/
Logged
Andy
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 544



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: November 01, 2021, 15:15:37 »

Thoughts with all rail staff, emergency staff and passengers who were victims of or witness to the accident, especially the driver, whose injuries seem to be more serious than first reported. Thank goodness no lives were lost.

Logged
broadgage
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5407



View Profile
« Reply #36 on: November 01, 2021, 15:20:24 »

If I have understood correctly, the two trains involved were travelling in opposite directions.
In that case, I retract my earlier remarks that imply that the signalling system should have prevented the SECOND collision.

If two trains are proceeding in the SAME direction, on the same line, then even if the first train suffers an accident, the second train should be held a safe distance away by the signalling system.

If however two trains are proceeding in OPPOSITE directions, and the first one is derailed, then it can be hard to prevent a second accident. If the first train, or any substantial parts thereof is foul of the OTHER line, then no automatic system can reliably prevent the second train colliding with the the first one.

Under such circumstances, reliance must be placed on human actions such as;
Press the emergency button on the cab radio, so doing sends a "stop danger" message to other trains in the area.
Apply track circuit operating clips to other line, this puts signals back to danger.
A member of train crew to walk back along the track with a red flag or lamp, and apply detonators.
Make an emergency phone call, preferably from a signal post telephone. Cellphone as a second choice.

Such actions might not be in time to avoid a second accident.

IMPORTANT EDIT. Both trains were travelling in the sane direction. See following post for details.
« Last Edit: November 01, 2021, 15:45:05 by broadgage » Logged

A proper intercity train has a minimum of 8 coaches, gangwayed throughout, with first at one end, and a full sized buffet car between first and standard.
It has space for cycles, surfboards,luggage etc.
A 5 car DMU (Diesel Multiple Unit) is not a proper inter-city train. The 5+5 and 9 car DMUs are almost as bad.
JayMac
Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 18918



View Profile
« Reply #37 on: November 01, 2021, 15:32:00 »

If I have understood correctly, the two trains involved were travelling in opposite directions.

The two trains were both travelling toward Salisbury and collided at Salisbury Tunnel Junction. The GWR (Great Western Railway) service was travelling from Portsmouth to Cardiff and the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) service from Waterloo to Honiton.
Logged

"Build a man a fire and he'll be warm for the rest of the day. Set a man on fire and he'll be warm for the rest of his life."

- Sir Terry Pratchett.
paul7575
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 5318


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: November 01, 2021, 16:09:14 »

If I have understood correctly, the two trains involved were travelling in opposite directions.
In that case, I retract my earlier remarks that imply that the signalling system should have prevented the SECOND collision.
[…]
There are now more recent reports this afternoon, eg from BTP (British Transport Police) that I quoted, that there was no second event at all…

Paul
Logged
Gordon the Blue Engine
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 752


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: November 01, 2021, 16:43:15 »

One conclusion from the published pictures is that both trains were moving when they came together and collided. Note that the trailing cab of the GWR (Great Western Railway) train shows no sign of being hit by the leading cab of the SWR» (South Western Railway - about) train.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7162


View Profile
« Reply #40 on: November 01, 2021, 16:50:21 »

That BTP (British Transport Police) press release of 13:40 today starts off with:
Quote
British Transport Police detectives have begun an investigation into a train collision in Salisbury, Wiltshire last night (31 October). 

At around 6.45pm, a Great Western Railway service from Southampton to Cardiff collided with a South Western Railway service from London to Honiton as they both entered the Fisherton Tunnel in Salisbury.

Both trains were travelling in the same direction and one train struck the side of the other, causing it to derail whilst in the tunnel. The front few carriages remained upright while the back tipped on their side...

That would fit in with the idea that both trains were moving, though that in itself raises problems over the recorded timings. But I'm still not taking it as a definitive statement, given some bits that are are obviously wrong.
Logged
stuving
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7162


View Profile
« Reply #41 on: November 01, 2021, 17:43:08 »

There are informed suggestions that the GWR (Great Western Railway) train split in the tunnel - so the picture showing two trains from the front roughly side by side is of the second of two 2-car GWR 158s. When that happened isn't clear.
Logged
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12355


View Profile Email
« Reply #42 on: November 01, 2021, 17:54:35 »

‘Travelling in the same direction’ simply means they were going the same way (towards Salisbury station), not that they were actually both moving.

We’ll have to await the initial RAIB (Rail Accident Investigation Branch) report to know for sure. I suspect also that the BTP (British Transport Police) will be ‘asked’ to shut up about what they think happened & await the report too. They were wrong with an initial report about the derailment prior to the crash….
« Last Edit: November 01, 2021, 18:41:00 by ChrisB » Logged
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40770



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #43 on: November 01, 2021, 18:14:28 »

From GWR (Great Western Railway), SWR» (South Western Railway - about) and Network Rail, by email, headed "Incident at Fisherton Tunnel"

Quote
Dear Graham
 
You will be aware that yesterday evening (Sunday 31 October) there was an incident at Fisherton Tunnel, near Salisbury. While we’re thankful the majority of customers and colleagues have now been able to go home safely, unfortunately it has become clear that a driver sustained a more serious injury and continues to be treated in hospital. We know everyone in the railway family is wishing him a full and swift recovery.
 
This was an upsetting experience for our customers. Their patience and understanding was appreciated by everyone on site and our thoughts remain with them.
 
The British Transport Police have been clear their investigations are in the very early stages, and it is likely the trains involved will need to remain on site for some time. The line will stay closed for at least a few days.
 
Currently, South Western Railway is unable to run to the West of Salisbury and there is a limited bus replacement service in operation. Our advice to those customers is to avoid all but essential travel on those routes.
 
Great Western Railway is running a bus service between Salisbury and Romsey, with trains operating shuttle services between Cardiff, Bristol and Salisbury, and Romsey to Portsmouth on either side of the line closure.
 
We will continue to update you and we are grateful for the support already shown by stakeholders.  We would also like to say thank you to our customers, colleagues and the emergency services for their support and dedication throughout this incident.
 
Best wishes
 
Mark Hopwood (Managing Director, Great Western Railway)
Claire Mann (Managing Director, South Western Railway)
Mark Killick (Wessex Route Director, Network Rail)
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 40770



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #44 on: November 01, 2021, 18:21:26 »

Thoughts with all rail staff, emergency staff and passengers who were victims of or witness to the accident, especially the driver, whose injuries seem to be more serious than first reported. Thank goodness no lives were lost.

They have been stated as "life changing" but just stated as "life threatening" in a BBC» (British Broadcasting Corporation - home page) report I have just heard. Let us just hope that's a slip of the tongue; a difficult day to get wording accurate in a sea of developing and amending news.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 12
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page