Train GraphicClick on the map to explore geographics
 
I need help
FAQ
Emergency
About .
Travel & transport from BBC stories as at 15:35 04 Oct 2024
 
- Airlines look to cut time spent on the tarmac
Read about the forum [here].
Register [here] - it's free.
What do I gain from registering? [here]
 11/10/24 - TWSW General Meeting
22/10/24 - BoA Public Transport talk
25/10/24 - Melksham Transport Group
27/11/24 - WWRUG, Trowbridge

On this day
4th Oct (1976)
HST - first public service (link)

Train RunningCancelled
13:03 London Paddington to Plymouth
15:15 Plymouth to London Paddington
15:42 Exeter St Davids to London Paddington
15:54 Reading to Gatwick Airport
16:54 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
16:58 London Paddington to Great Malvern
17:04 Didcot Parkway to Moreton-In-Marsh
17:29 Gatwick Airport to Reading
18:23 London Paddington to Banbury
18:45 Exeter St Davids to Okehampton
18:51 Evesham to Oxford
19:05 Great Malvern to London Paddington
19:24 Reading to Gatwick Airport
19:31 Okehampton to Exeter Central
19:45 Banbury to London Paddington
20:19 Exeter Central to Barnstaple
21:41 Barnstaple to Exeter St Davids
Short Run
10:59 Cardiff Central to Penzance
12:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
12:48 London Paddington to Swansea
13:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
13:48 London Paddington to Carmarthen
13:52 Cardiff Central to London Paddington
14:05 Salisbury to Bristol Temple Meads
14:09 London Paddington to Cardiff Central
14:23 Exmouth to Paignton
15:08 Didcot Parkway to London Paddington
15:23 Portsmouth Harbour to Cardiff Central
15:45 Bristol Temple Meads to Warminster
Delayed
12:30 Cardiff Central to Portsmouth Harbour
14:23 Swansea to London Paddington
Additional 14:57 Bristol Temple Meads to Cardiff Central
PollsOpen and recent polls
Open to 24/10 03:05 Purely a light-hearted question, but who do you bet on?
Abbreviation pageAcronymns and abbreviations
Stn ComparatorStation Comparator
Rail newsNews Now - live rail news feed
Site Style 1 2 3 4
Next departures • Bristol Temple MeadsBath SpaChippenhamSwindonDidcot ParkwayReadingLondon PaddingtonMelksham
Exeter St DavidsTauntonWestburyTrowbridgeBristol ParkwayCardiff CentralOxfordCheltenham SpaBirmingham New Street
October 04, 2024, 15:39:31 *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Forgotten your username or password? - get a reminder
Most recently liked subjects
[92] Meet the Director, 3 October - an update
[56] Euston: a five point plan
[55] TODAY! Meet the Manager - on the forum and on Zoom
[53] vote for your favourite rail leaf cleaner
[52] New entrance, Bakerloo Line, Paddington. Opened October 2024
[44] Lessons from Ladbroke Grove crash 25 years on
 
News: A forum for passengers ... with input from rail professionals welcomed too
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: Future of RoSCos (Rolling Stock Companies)  (Read 6341 times)
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42020



View Profile WWW Email
« on: December 07, 2021, 09:27:25 »

From Christian Wolmar on the new scene under GBR (Great British Railways):

Quote
The purpose of Roscos was to guarantee the long term future of trains under a short term franchise system. This will no longer apply.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: December 07, 2021, 17:12:51 »

Quote
The purpose of Roscos was to guarantee the long term future of trains under a short term franchise system. This will no longer apply.
My bold - really? Short-term franchises will I understand become short-term concessions, but reading the latest 'Modern Railways' there is a suggestion that the TOC (Train Operating Company) will still be responsible for train procurement. I doubt I'll be surprised if the new Passenger Service Contracts turn out to be very similar to the pre-COVID Franchise Contracts in terms of who does what, save for the fact that GBR (Great British Railways) will take the revenue risk (and perhaps specify livery).
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
ChrisB
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 12723


View Profile Email
« Reply #2 on: December 07, 2021, 17:56:00 »

My understanding is that the stations will all be run by GBR (Great British Railways)…who will also sell the tickets & set the fares. It’ll be very different
Logged
Rhydgaled
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 1500


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: December 07, 2021, 21:35:40 »

My understanding is that the stations will all be run by GBR (Great British Railways)…who will also sell the tickets & set the fares. It’ll be very different
The peice in Modern Railways casts doubt on that too (note that W-SP refers to the Williams-Shap Plan):

Quote from: Roger Ford (Modern Railways Dec 2021, page 34)
According to the W-SP, 'Dedicated station management teams will be created locally within regional divisions of Great British Railways to manage stations, land and assets'. Now, 'manage' covers a potential multitude of activities and I assumed it included staffing.
It then refers to the next item, which includes the following (PSCs are Passenger Service Contracts):
Quote from: Roger Ford (Modern Railways Dec 2021, page 37)
According to the Market Engagement Preview, a PSC's main responsibilities will be:
  • operating trains to a high-level of operational performance;
  • procuring, preparing and maintaining rolling stock;
  • delivering high standards of customer experience on train and at station;
  • acting as a train service operations partner to GBR as it develops and refines its passenger offer.
Bold added by me. Towards the end of that item, the author writes "I wonder what other heavyweight duties it " (a PSC) "will acquire as reality sets in?"
Logged

----------------------------
Don't DOO (Driver-Only Operation (that is, trains which operate without carrying a guard)) it, keep the guard (but it probably wouldn't be a bad idea if the driver unlocked the doors on arrival at calling points).
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 810


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2021, 10:49:52 »

The initial DfT» (Department for Transport - about) press release concerning the creation of GBR (Great British Railways) indicated that the ROSCO» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about)'s would be retained. I have not seen any more recent announcements that this intention had changed.

https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/994603/gbr-williams-shapps-plan-for-rail.pdf     Page 50

I thought at the time 'they cannot be serious!'
Logged
eXPassenger
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 567


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2021, 16:13:21 »

From the viewpoint of the DfT» (Department for Transport - about) and the Treasury the ROSCOs» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about) have the advantage that they incur the capital cost of trains and GBR (Great British Railways) (DfF, or whoever) then have the operational cost of meeting the lease payments.  Without the ROSCOs the capital cost of the trains would fall on the Treasury.
Logged
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4444


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2021, 20:48:41 »

It is an absolute certainty that the UK (United Kingdom) railways will be a blend of State and private sector, GBR (Great British Railways) is not intended to be and never will be a BR (British Rail(ways)).  With stations if it makes sense for a concession / franchise / train service operator to manage and staff stations on a route and then that will happen, an example is TfL» (Transport for London - about) Rail.

Network Rail as the infrastructure operator and maintainer is almost certainly going to change under GBR once NR» (Network Rail - home page) has been dissolved and it has been transferred into GBR

There is a NR / RDG(resolve) team currently working on the whole operating model of the UK railways under GBR,
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Lee
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 7519


GBR - The Emperor's New Rail Network


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2021, 21:34:14 »

GBR (Great British Railways) is not intended to be and never will be a BR (British Rail(ways))

Indeed - It is actually intended to be a new SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about), and will be as powerless in the face of, and as criminally underfunded by, the Treasury as that godforsaken organisation was.

Consequently it will be every bit as much of a failure.
Logged

Vous devez être impitoyable, parce que ces gens sont des salauds - https://looka.com/s/78722877
Electric train
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 4444


The future is 25000 Volts AC 750V DC has its place


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: December 10, 2021, 06:33:54 »

GBR (Great British Railways) is not intended to be and never will be a BR (British Rail(ways))

Indeed - It is actually intended to be a new SRA» (Strategic Rail Authority - about), and will be as powerless in the face of, and as criminally underfunded by, the Treasury as that godforsaken organisation was.

Consequently it will be every bit as much of a failure.

A UK (United Kingdom) Government reorganisation of the UK railways being a failure .............. surely not  Grin Grin Grin
Logged

Starship just experienced what we call a rapid unscheduled disassembly, or a RUD, during ascent,”
Bob_Blakey
Transport Scholar
Hero Member
******
Posts: 810


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: December 10, 2021, 15:07:46 »

.....Without the ROSCOs» (Rolling Stock Owning Company - about) the capital cost of the trains would fall on the Treasury.

but over the lifespan of the equipment would, I think, be a significantly lower cost to the taxpayer.
Logged
IndustryInsider
Data Manager
Hero Member
******
Posts: 10281


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: May 09, 2024, 10:24:31 »

Article which summarises the current state of play quite well:

https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/british-railway-bosses-leech-taxpayers-32765790?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#amp-readmore-target
Logged

To view my GWML (Great Western Main Line) Electrification cab video 'before and after' video comparison, as well as other videos of the new layout at Reading and 'before and after' comparisons of the Cotswold Line Redoubling scheme, see: http://www.dailymotion.com/user/IndustryInsider/
grahame
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Posts: 42020



View Profile WWW Email
« Reply #11 on: May 09, 2024, 10:46:15 »


Quote
Analysis shows more than a fifth of everything operators have spent since 2017 - more than £22billion - has gone to those leasing companies. The Office for Rail and Road (ORR» (Office of Rail and Road formerly Office of Rail Regulation - about)) says these companies have, in turn, paid £1.5billion in dividends during that time.

Yet passengers have seen fares soar and the taxpayers has pumped billions into supporting the railways. Labour recently pledged to renationalise the railways if it came to power.

But rolling stock companies are not part of its plans because of the huge cost of bringing them back into state ownership. According to the ORR, firms paid £413milliion in dividends last year alone, during which time profit margins trebled. Three big owners of passenger trains are Porterbrook, Angel Trains and Eversholt.

I am not defending the RoSCos, nor do I know how much their investment / capitalisation is, but 1.5 billion out of 22 billion is just under 7%.   Noting it says "profit margin has trebled" I would like to see annual stats.
Logged

Coffee Shop Admin, Acting Chair of Melksham Rail User Group, Option 24/7 Melksham Rep
Do you have something you would like to add to this thread, or would you like to raise a new question at the Coffee Shop? Please [register] (it is free) if you have not done so before, or login (at the top of this page) if you already have an account - we would love to read what you have to say!

You can find out more about how this forum works [here] - that will link you to a copy of the forum agreement that you can read before you join, and tell you very much more about how we operate. We are an independent forum, provided and run by customers of Great Western Railway, for customers of Great Western Railway and we welcome railway professionals as members too, in either a personal or official capacity. Views expressed in posts are not necessarily the views of the operators of the forum.

As well as posting messages onto existing threads, and starting new subjects, members can communicate with each other through personal messages if they wish. And once members have made a certain number of posts, they will automatically be admitted to the "frequent posters club", where subjects not-for-public-domain are discussed; anything from the occasional rant to meetups we may be having ...

 
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.2 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
This forum is provided by customers of Great Western Railway (formerly First Great Western), and the views expressed are those of the individual posters concerned. Visit www.gwr.com for the official Great Western Railway website. Please contact the administrators of this site if you feel that the content provided by one of our posters contravenes our posting rules (email link to report). Forum hosted by Well House Consultants

Jump to top of pageJump to Forum Home Page